Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jilly_in_VA

(9,962 posts)
Sat Oct 23, 2021, 11:29 AM Oct 2021

Rampant Poaching Forces Elephants to Evolve to Not Have Tusks, Study Finds

Elephants in Mozambique are evolving away from having tusks due to pressure from rampant poaching over decades, according to a daunting new study.

Published in the journal Science on Friday, the report from researchers across departments at Princeton University, the non-profit ElephantVoices, Gorongosa National Park in Mozambique, and the University of Idaho, analyzed survey data that suggests natural selection has favored tusklessness in female elephants—a rare genetic trait that has become more common—amid high rates of poaching and population decline.

The researchers took scans of the entire elephant genome and located two genes associated with tooth development in mammals, both of which guide the formation of enamel, dentin, and other materials necessary for tooth and tusk development. One of the genes—AMELX, which provides instructions for the creation of a protein called amelogenin—was found to be associated with selection pressure due to poaching.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/qjbdnp/rampant-poaching-forces-elephants-to-evolve-to-not-have-tusks-study-finds

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rampant Poaching Forces Elephants to Evolve to Not Have Tusks, Study Finds (Original Post) Jilly_in_VA Oct 2021 OP
Afraid it can't happen soon enough Bayard Oct 2021 #1
Unfortunately, they have need of their tusks Hekate Oct 2021 #5
Apparently not having them is an even more pressing need right now. Crunchy Frog Oct 2021 #6
I suppose you could say 'evolve' but it's very much UN-natural selection Hugh_Lebowski Oct 2021 #2
I also don't like the use of "evolve" in this context intrepidity Oct 2021 #3
Kind of like a man made global warming on elephant tusks. Ka-Dinh Oy Oct 2021 #4
Rattlesnakes without their warning system are showing up in numbers... Hekate Oct 2021 #7
 

Hugh_Lebowski

(33,643 posts)
2. I suppose you could say 'evolve' but it's very much UN-natural selection
Sat Oct 23, 2021, 11:40 AM
Oct 2021

And it sure sucks that it's happening

intrepidity

(7,288 posts)
3. I also don't like the use of "evolve" in this context
Sat Oct 23, 2021, 11:51 AM
Oct 2021

It would be so much more accurate to say that the elephant population is reflecting a man-made selective pressure.

Using "evolve" evokes a Lamarkian transformation, IMHO.

Hekate

(90,616 posts)
7. Rattlesnakes without their warning system are showing up in numbers...
Sat Oct 23, 2021, 02:12 PM
Oct 2021

I found out because a neighbor took her dog to a special training class to learn how to identify them by smell.

Rattlesnakes are something else being selected out by human behavior — we’ve finally managed to ignorantly kill enough of them that warn us of their presence that the survivors are virtually silent.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Rampant Poaching Forces E...