General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAlec Baldwin was given loaded weapon and told it was a 'cold gun', court records show
The assistant director did not know the prop gun was loaded with live rounds, according to a search warrant filed in a Santa Fe court.
As a film crew and actors, including Baldwin, in Western costumes prepared to rehearse a scene inside a wooden, chapel-like building on a desert movie ranch, assistant director Dave Halls stepped outside and grabbed a prop gun from three laid out on a cart.
He walked back in and handed it to Baldwin, the films star, assuring him it was safe to use because it didnt have live ammunition.
Cold gun, Halls yelled. But it was not what movie workers term a safe, cold, weapon.
When Baldwin fired the gun, the cinematographer, Halyna Hutchins, was shot in the chest. The director, Joel Souza, who was standing behind her, was wounded, the records show.
https://www.theguardian.com/film/2021/oct/22/alec-baldwin-film-shooting-halyna-hutchins
OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)1 How the hell could you load a prop gun with a live bullet ?
2 How could that be accidental ?
3 How is it that Ms Hutchins was shot and not an actor in the scene ?
padah513
(2,500 posts)Was she in the scene? If not, why was a gun fired in her direction?
femmedem
(8,201 posts)wackadoo wabbit
(1,166 posts)Why not shoot it into a mattress?
femmedem
(8,201 posts)But sometimes the film crew will have a protective clear barrier between them and the gun.
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)That was probably the scene - actor with gun firing into the camera. The camera operator and director would be standing right behind the camera.
Native
(5,940 posts)Polybius
(15,381 posts)He probably didn't want to point it at the actor, and it was off to the side a bit. Prop guns that fire blanks are not pointed directly at the target (for reasons like this). Unfortunately, he likely didn't see that Hutchins was in the gun's line of fire.
Ms. Toad
(34,060 posts)#1 and #3 are answered in the article.
Fullduplexxx
(7,857 posts)Of trump
bucolic_frolic
(43,127 posts)but that's for authorities to establish. Let's not get ahead of a false narrative about fake guns that are safe.
durablend
(7,460 posts)SoCalDavidS
(9,998 posts)I'd say 30/70 it would come out.
sarisataka
(18,599 posts)Was certainly leaving a lot to chance and hoped for many coincidences for their plan to work
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)Last edited Sat Oct 23, 2021, 05:19 PM - Edit history (1)
some of the safety people who walked out previously, for lack of safety procedures, decided to make a point...????????
I see no reason that a live round should have been anywhere on the movie set. Where did it come from?
My bet is either your speculation, or mine
Also, watch the expert demonstrate (on Rachel), that a prop gun will not even allow a live round to be inserted........
Why was a real gun even being used????????????
At any rate, my heart goes out to Baldwin who will live with this the rest of his life.......
Most of all........someone knowingly, and intentionally, put a live round in a prop weapon.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,166 posts)I was wondering what was going on with that.
The fact that this man shot at someone without checking the gun first. And the fact that he was the producer of a film that was so unsafe that the union employees complained and then walked off the set and/or were fired. And the fact that the armorer, who was ultimately in charge of said gun, whom he, as producer, hired, was non-union and was, in fact, probably hired because of nepotism. Yeah, none of these facts matter.
Fullduplexxx
(7,857 posts)mikeysnot
(4,756 posts)usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)I own guns pistols, shotguns, and long guns.
In the world of guns that I live in, I was taught.
1. YOU are responsible for always making sure the gun is safe. Unload, has a clear chamber, and/or the safety is on.
2. Never put your finger on the trigger until you are ready to fire and you KNOW your target.
3. Never point any gun at another living thing especially a person. Keep the barrel point down to the ground.
And finally, if there are kids around keep all guns in a gun safe.
If the story is correct sadly basic gun safety rules were not followed.
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)A prop is a prop. They expect a prop.
Why would a gun on the set be loaded?
To actors guns are always toys.
usaf-vet
(6,181 posts)Sadly lots of kids are killed by perceived "toy" guns.
LakeArenal
(28,817 posts)stopdiggin
(11,295 posts)but 'live ammunition' - in this context? My head just explodes.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)of not following the universal gun handling rules that are followed in 99 percent of gun use situations--but those are weapons being used as weapons. This is a prop situation in an industry and culture that has its own handling and safety standards, which appear to be based on the expectations and dangers of firing blanks. Perhaps he was careless and culpable related to the possibility of blanks in the gun, according to FILM INDUSTRY standards. But why on earth would anyone in charge of that production think or expect a real bullet might be in there? Edit to add: A lot of people really hate Alec Baldwin, I've come to find out. Gun nuts appear to hate him, obviously MAGA hates him, who else?
NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)A face on shot facing camera is a classic cinematic technique. Gun rules apply when using firearms for shooting. An actor with a prop expects a prop.
Deep State Witch
(10,424 posts)They're not "toys" to play around with. They are props. You are handed one, you do your thing with it, and you hand it back. Ever since Jon-Erik Hexum died because he was goofing around with a gun loaded with blanks, I would imagine that actors have been trained not to do stuff like that.
stopdiggin
(11,295 posts)on a movie set? (granted I know nothing about making movies). But this seems such an egregious error. A 'loaded' weapon - just laying around out on a table? Live ammo? So outrageous it begs belief.
and, yes - every tenet you outlined is fundamental and basic instruction.
JohnSJ
(92,131 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)a lot of movies would be impossible to make.
DENVERPOPS
(8,810 posts)anyone hands me a firearm, the first thing I do is check the gun for it being loaded, always pointed down at the ground.......
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)Especially not "prop gun with blank inside being handled and checked by professionals whom this is all they do for a living, and I've done this a zillion times before and no bullet ever came out because why would there be an actual bullet in this prop gun".
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)in2herbs
(2,945 posts)ColinC
(8,287 posts)I knew a film crew that used green slabs of paper for their guns. The special effects made them look no different than if they actually had guns
Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)I actually dress as Indiana Jones sometimes
i have have a gun that looks very realistic, but is incapable of firing actual rounds.
And I do have a couple prop guns that are built with real guns, buy the cylinders have been modified to allow only blanks to fit.
My guess is that they are more expensive to rent.
Tarc
(10,476 posts)"When rehearsing, actors have dummy guns, there's no firing mechanism at all. Right before the cameras roll, a prop master comes out and swaps them for "live" guns; they can "fire", but it is just blanks. As soon as "cut!" is called, the guns are gathered and stored. "
Here, this is the first I've heard of the assistant director story. He should NOT have been handling the guns, the prop master should not have allowed the guns to be handled without his direct supervision. And honestly, Baldwin should not have accepted it from the ass't dir.
Groundhawg
(545 posts)No matter what professional said he did beforehand.
Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)to do that. What if you are filming a scene with a five year old child picking up a gun?
Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)I was once on a project where I had to be around a lot of guns, but not actually use one or even touch one myself. I was required to rake a 4 long day gun course. Actors can do a half-hour long training session on how to ensure the prop guns are safe.
Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)you can train any adult how to check every type of gun to see if it is loaded?
The fact is, the movie industry relies on highly trained professionals to do this, and that's who fucked up here.
That's how the whole world works. People specialize in what they do for a living. They hire experts for other things. That's why the movie industry has stunt people. Actors are quite often not experts in what their character is doing.
Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)Revolvers are all quite similar, as are semiautos.
Seriously
not that complicated.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)"Only minimal COVID-19 precautions were taken even though crew and cast members often worked in small enclosed spaces on the ranch, the crew member who spoke to the AP said. He said he never witnessed any formal orientation about weapons used on set, which normally would take place before filming begins."
https://www.nbc12.com/2021/10/23/alec-baldwin-was-told-gun-was-cold-before-movie-set-shooting/
Happy Hoosier
(7,285 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)They even said there had been several accidental firearms discharges. That's why the entire union crew resigned that morning. The two people shot were the only ones that stayed. Unions don't like people who do that. The plot thickens, I suppose.
Groundhawg
(545 posts)Azathoth
(4,607 posts)They're working long days, they have to film multiple takes of each scene, usually from different angles. Actor is handed a gun, they do the take, gun gets handed back and reset for next take, everything gets moved around, people giving directions and controlled chaos, gun is handed to actor again, rinse repeat maybe a couple dozen times. The gun is just another prop in a complicated assembly line type of operation. Even if the actor did take the time to personally check the firearm every time it was handed to him, eventually there'd come a point where they were trying to squeeze one more take in at the end of a long day and he'd forget.
It's just not an environment where proper gun safety is going to be practiced rigorously.
Buckeye_Democrat
(14,853 posts)Was the cart being constantly monitored by a crew member? If not, that's just so careless.
The gun should've been inspected immediately before the scene anyway.
LiberalFighter
(50,880 posts)Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)but I'm not ready to make the leap that if someone doesn't belong to a union, they don't know what they are doing. There are plenty of people in the world who are experts at their occupation who don't belong to a union.
LiberalFighter
(50,880 posts)wackadoo wabbit
(1,166 posts)She was the 24-year-old step-daughter of a famous armorer and had worked on only one other film in her life
sarisataka
(18,599 posts)Was a complete charlie-foxtrot.
Initech
(100,063 posts)I can't even...
Mr.Bill
(24,280 posts)if it was Ted Nugent who pulled the trigger.
BeerBarrelPolka
(1,202 posts)I sure hope they lock up Dick Cheney!
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)So, yeah.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)Lots of tragedy could be avoided if everyone who has a gun in their possession follows that very simple rule
gldstwmn
(4,575 posts)Gun safety is lost on psychotics.
Kaleva
(36,294 posts)Azathoth
(4,607 posts)Live ammo shouldn't even be in the same location, never mind mixed up with blanks and loaded in prop guns.
There's no excuse for this.
Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)and someone brings in a bottle of REAL cyanide capsules onto the set. Either completely idiotic, or malice.
Azathoth
(4,607 posts)Someone posted an article recently where a prop guy on another movie was talking about doing a night shoot on location in some dark forest and having to use a flashlight to sort through the live ammo and blanks that were apparently all mixed together in a bag.
This is Keystone Cops levels of criminal incompetence.
taxi
(1,896 posts)Mandating that a life insurance policy be purchased for all persons in any capacity at sets with any firearms of any type, from plastic replicas to the real thing, might make firearms in film a thing of the past by the prohibitive costs alone. The conditions upon which any device resembling a firearm are allowed on set could easily be written, which could create administrative hurdles along with the increased policy costs.
calimary
(81,210 posts)Before Brandon Lee. I remember covering both of these, back when I was still working.
https://ew.com/article/1994/10/14/jon-erik-hexums-fatal-joke/
Photos here.
https://nypost.com/2021/10/22/prop-gun-deaths-haunt-hollywood-young-stars-shot-on-set/
Straw Man
(6,622 posts)They are used on movie sets, as are real guns firing blanks.
There are also replica guns that are capable of firing only blanks. I foresee a future in which these are the only kind allowed to be used on movie sets.
SYFROYH
(34,169 posts)I'm waiting until investigations are completed before making my judgments.
Given that accidents with prop guns (often due to negligence or ignorance) are well known in the film industry, it amazes me that an actor or director would allow a prop gun trigger to be pulled with the barrel facing anything living.