Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Poiuyt

(18,122 posts)
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 01:36 AM Oct 2021

Men shot by Rittenhouse can be described as 'rioters' and 'looters' but not 'victims,' judge rules

Kyle Rittenhouse’s lawyers can refer to the men he shot as “rioters” and “looters,” but prosecutors still may not call them “victims” at any time during the teen’s upcoming murder trial, a judge ruled Monday.

Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder cautioned the defense team against using pejorative terms during opening statements, but he said they could use them in their closing arguments if the evidence suggested the men engaged in criminal acts.

--snip--

“The word victim is a loaded, loaded word,” Schroeder said.

The ruling — among the last issued by Schroeder before jury selection begins Nov. 1 — clearly frustrated prosecutors, who suggested the judge was creating a double standard by allowing Rosenbaum and Huber to be disparaged when they could not defend themselves.

“The terms that I’m identifying here such as rioter, looter and arsonist are as loaded, if not more loaded, than the term victim,” Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger said.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/rittenhouse-back-court-today-prosecutors-125700152.html

I guess we know who the judge is going to favor.

53 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Men shot by Rittenhouse can be described as 'rioters' and 'looters' but not 'victims,' judge rules (Original Post) Poiuyt Oct 2021 OP
I hope this isn't another nazi-loving judge Walleye Oct 2021 #1
here he is possibly making the white power sign Celerity Oct 2021 #15
I would bet my life saving this scumbag judge RAB910 Oct 2021 #25
Mistrial aeromanKC Oct 2021 #2
Agreed angrychair Oct 2021 #3
My immediate response as well mahina Oct 2021 #14
If he is found not guilty, double jeopardy will apply. LisaL Oct 2021 #21
Yup. And impeachment written all over that judge. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #29
With that tone, Rittenhouse will be called a volunteer medic but not a murderer. yonder Oct 2021 #4
The fix is in... RockRaven Oct 2021 #5
Yeah,The judge is definitely impartial! sakabatou Oct 2021 #6
Same asshole judge who refused to issue arrest warrant dalton99a Oct 2021 #7
Judge Schroeder... GoCubsGo Oct 2021 #42
Hmmmmmm niyad Oct 2021 #48
Asking for a legal opinion here: at what point does the rise to mistrial level weirdness? LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2021 #53
Wow WHITT Oct 2021 #8
"The word victim is a loaded, loaded word," Schroeder said. orleans Oct 2021 #9
Well, horrible judge at the very least. cstanleytech Oct 2021 #13
And most likely, person ColinC Oct 2021 #16
OMFG. That judge is horrible. SunSeeker Oct 2021 #10
So call them "the target" . . . Journeyman Oct 2021 #11
That's brilliant ColinC Oct 2021 #17
The judge made a bad ruling x2. nt cstanleytech Oct 2021 #12
even if they were rioters and looters Skittles Oct 2021 #18
Most likely they were not. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #31
I was merely pointing out that it doesn't matter what they were Skittles Oct 2021 #43
Not using the word 'victim' in a criminal trial is pretty standard. Tomconroy Oct 2021 #19
But the dead are assumed guilty of rioting snd looting. Hmm...wonder why? n/t CincyDem Oct 2021 #20
The judge only allowed those terms to be used in closing Tomconroy Oct 2021 #23
Rittenhouses lawyers will use them anyway and "apologize" 20 times afterwards uponit7771 Oct 2021 #27
If that were to happen there would be consequences. Tomconroy Oct 2021 #34
They don't even need to do that. GoCubsGo Oct 2021 #51
Whoa! How biased is that? ananda Oct 2021 #22
The judge has already made the decision Bettie Oct 2021 #24
This message was self-deleted by its author uponit7771 Oct 2021 #26
Was this f'n asshole appointed, or elected? niyad Oct 2021 #28
Elected - unopposed dalton99a Oct 2021 #37
Disgusting. niyad Oct 2021 #41
Appointed first, then elected. Dr. Strange Oct 2021 #47
It comes down to, what was Rittenhouse's right to be there with a gun? Baitball Blogger Oct 2021 #30
He did not act like a vigilante. lagomorph777 Oct 2021 #32
+1 Baitball Blogger Oct 2021 #33
Rittenhouse ... DID NOT ... have right to be there with a gun in Wisconsin and in the process uponit7771 Oct 2021 #36
It's illegal for someone under the age of 18 to pocess a gun like that Poiuyt Oct 2021 #46
"Rioter" and "Looter" are loaded terms. Kid Berwyn Oct 2021 #35
Gaige Grosskreutz was armed. Dr. Strange Oct 2021 #38
Thank you. NT Kid Berwyn Oct 2021 #40
And then he lost an arm, or the use of it? niyad Oct 2021 #49
This is a done deal, then. Wingus Dingus Oct 2021 #39
Bias Johnny999r Oct 2021 #44
Bias Johnny999r Oct 2021 #45
This judge is a racist and needs to be replaced LetMyPeopleVote Oct 2021 #50
This judge is upset at his press coverage LetMyPeopleVote Nov 2021 #52

dalton99a

(81,455 posts)
7. Same asshole judge who refused to issue arrest warrant
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 02:10 AM
Oct 2021
On February 11, 2021, Judge Schroeder denied two requests by prosecutors to issue an arrest warrant and raise the bail of Kyle Rittenhouse, who is accused of shooting three men during a police brutality protest in the summer of 2020. Two of the men died. Rittenhouse moved for safety reasons without properly notifying prosecutors.

"Most people out on bond, we don't know where they are," Schroeder said. "To issue a warrant now for a defendant who has appeared at every hearing, that would be breaking the law, and I'm not going to do it."

GoCubsGo

(32,080 posts)
42. Judge Schroeder...
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 03:41 PM
Oct 2021

I wonder if he's related to Ricky Schroeder--who just so happened to help post Rittenhouse's bail money.

lagomorph777

(30,613 posts)
31. Most likely they were not.
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 09:49 AM
Oct 2021

The rioters and looters during that summer mostly turned out to be right-wing false-flag agitators.

 

Tomconroy

(7,611 posts)
19. Not using the word 'victim' in a criminal trial is pretty standard.
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 05:12 AM
Oct 2021

Its use implies that there was a crime committed, which is the state's obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The presumption of innocence applies in a courtroom. Outside the courtroom everyone can express an opinion.

 

Tomconroy

(7,611 posts)
23. The judge only allowed those terms to be used in closing
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 08:33 AM
Oct 2021

arguments if, and only if, there was evidence to support those terms. No assumption is being made.

 

Tomconroy

(7,611 posts)
34. If that were to happen there would be consequences.
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 10:53 AM
Oct 2021

As a criminal defense lawyer, you recognize your client may not be going home after a trial but, as a general rule, you want to.

GoCubsGo

(32,080 posts)
51. They don't even need to do that.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 07:57 AM
Oct 2021

Referring to them as "the targets of Mr. Rittenhouse's gunfire" and other iterations of this will get the point across just fine.

Bettie

(16,095 posts)
24. The judge has already made the decision
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 08:38 AM
Oct 2021

he just needs to ensure that the jury makes the same one.

And people wonder why we worry about justice in this country.

Response to Poiuyt (Original post)

Dr. Strange

(25,920 posts)
47. Appointed first, then elected.
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 11:08 PM
Oct 2021

Schroeder was first appointed to the bench by Governor Anthony Earl (D) in 1983. Schroeder was elected to the seat in 1984.

https://ballotpedia.org/Bruce_Schroeder

Baitball Blogger

(46,700 posts)
30. It comes down to, what was Rittenhouse's right to be there with a gun?
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 09:49 AM
Oct 2021

What was his legal responsibility? Did he act like a vigilante?

uponit7771

(90,335 posts)
36. Rittenhouse ... DID NOT ... have right to be there with a gun in Wisconsin and in the process
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 11:00 AM
Oct 2021

... of Rittenhouse committing a felony (possession of the mass kill weapon) people were killed.

My understanding is RittenHouse can be tagged with those killings even if he didn't shoot them himself and he did.

Poiuyt

(18,122 posts)
46. It's illegal for someone under the age of 18 to pocess a gun like that
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 11:04 PM
Oct 2021

but that charge is only a misdemeanor.

Kid Berwyn

(14,891 posts)
35. "Rioter" and "Looter" are loaded terms.
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 10:57 AM
Oct 2021

Especially when the victims were peaceable, unarmed and posed no threat to the accused gunman.

Johnny999r

(71 posts)
44. Bias
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 09:09 PM
Oct 2021

The two unarmed victims were conducting a peaceful and lawful protest when Rittenhouse decided to murder them when they apparently tried to disarm him. I hope there are witnesses to the first murder, the second murder happened when the brave victim attempted to take the assault rifle away from him to prevent others from being killed by the gun nut Rittenhouse. Unfortunately, the victim didn't succeed and was shot dead by the suspect. I wonder if the judge disallowed the prosecution from using the word "suspect" as well?

Clearly, this judge has an agenda and a background check of his decisions would probably show a pattern of bias.

This is what happens when right wing nationalist politicians allow anyone to carry concealed or openly exposed firearms. I'll bet many police officers, especially in the south, just assume occupants of a car they just pulled over are armed. I would if I were in their shoes. Many people believe by carrying a gun they are protected, what they don't realize is the element of surprise and chaos. It's either too late to respond or they can't handle the stress of shots being fired.

Johnny999r

(71 posts)
45. Bias
Tue Oct 26, 2021, 09:10 PM
Oct 2021

The two unarmed victims were conducting a peaceful and lawful protest when Rittenhouse decided to murder them when they apparently tried to disarm him. I hope there are witnesses to the first murder, the second murder happened when the brave victim attempted to take the assault rifle away from him to prevent others from being killed by the gun nut Rittenhouse. Unfortunately, the victim didn't succeed and was shot dead by the suspect. I wonder if the judge disallowed the prosecution from using the word "suspect" as well?

Clearly, this judge has an agenda and a background check of his decisions would probably show a pattern of bias.

This is what happens when right wing nationalist politicians allow anyone to carry concealed or openly exposed firearms. I'll bet many police officers, especially in the south, just assume occupants of a car they just pulled over are armed. I would if I were in their shoes. Many people believe by carrying a gun they are protected, what they don't realize is the element of surprise and chaos. It's either too late to respond or they can't handle the stress of shots being fired.

LetMyPeopleVote

(145,138 posts)
52. This judge is upset at his press coverage
Wed Nov 3, 2021, 06:58 PM
Nov 2021

This judge is making bad rulings and is upset that people disagree with these bad rulings


Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Men shot by Rittenhouse c...