General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMen shot by Rittenhouse can be described as 'rioters' and 'looters' but not 'victims,' judge rules
Kyle Rittenhouses lawyers can refer to the men he shot as rioters and looters, but prosecutors still may not call them victims at any time during the teens upcoming murder trial, a judge ruled Monday.
Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder cautioned the defense team against using pejorative terms during opening statements, but he said they could use them in their closing arguments if the evidence suggested the men engaged in criminal acts.
--snip--
The word victim is a loaded, loaded word, Schroeder said.
The ruling among the last issued by Schroeder before jury selection begins Nov. 1 clearly frustrated prosecutors, who suggested the judge was creating a double standard by allowing Rosenbaum and Huber to be disparaged when they could not defend themselves.
The terms that Im identifying here such as rioter, looter and arsonist are as loaded, if not more loaded, than the term victim, Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger said.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/rittenhouse-back-court-today-prosecutors-125700152.html
I guess we know who the judge is going to favor.
Walleye
(31,015 posts)Celerity
(43,333 posts)RAB910
(3,501 posts)aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)This has mistrial written all over it.
angrychair
(8,697 posts)No doubt.
mahina
(17,646 posts)I hope youre right
LisaL
(44,973 posts)He will not be tried again.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)yonder
(9,664 posts)RockRaven
(14,959 posts)sakabatou
(42,152 posts)dalton99a
(81,455 posts)"Most people out on bond, we don't know where they are," Schroeder said. "To issue a warrant now for a defendant who has appeared at every hearing, that would be breaking the law, and I'm not going to do it."
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)I wonder if he's related to Ricky Schroeder--who just so happened to help post Rittenhouse's bail money.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,138 posts)Just Wow.
orleans
(34,051 posts)what an absolutely horrible person!
cstanleytech
(26,284 posts)ColinC
(8,291 posts)SunSeeker
(51,550 posts)And so wrong.
Journeyman
(15,031 posts)ColinC
(8,291 posts)cstanleytech
(26,284 posts)Skittles
(153,150 posts)HE IS A MURDERER
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)The rioters and looters during that summer mostly turned out to be right-wing false-flag agitators.
Skittles
(153,150 posts)HE IS WORSE
Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)Its use implies that there was a crime committed, which is the state's obligation to prove beyond a reasonable doubt. The presumption of innocence applies in a courtroom. Outside the courtroom everyone can express an opinion.
CincyDem
(6,354 posts)Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)arguments if, and only if, there was evidence to support those terms. No assumption is being made.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Tomconroy
(7,611 posts)As a criminal defense lawyer, you recognize your client may not be going home after a trial but, as a general rule, you want to.
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)Referring to them as "the targets of Mr. Rittenhouse's gunfire" and other iterations of this will get the point across just fine.
ananda
(28,858 posts)Sounds like a pre-determined verdict.
Bettie
(16,095 posts)he just needs to ensure that the jury makes the same one.
And people wonder why we worry about justice in this country.
Response to Poiuyt (Original post)
uponit7771 This message was self-deleted by its author.
niyad
(113,275 posts)dalton99a
(81,455 posts)niyad
(113,275 posts)Dr. Strange
(25,920 posts)Schroeder was first appointed to the bench by Governor Anthony Earl (D) in 1983. Schroeder was elected to the seat in 1984.
https://ballotpedia.org/Bruce_Schroeder
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)What was his legal responsibility? Did he act like a vigilante?
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)He acted like a serial killer.
Baitball Blogger
(46,700 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)... of Rittenhouse committing a felony (possession of the mass kill weapon) people were killed.
My understanding is RittenHouse can be tagged with those killings even if he didn't shoot them himself and he did.
Poiuyt
(18,122 posts)but that charge is only a misdemeanor.
Kid Berwyn
(14,891 posts)Especially when the victims were peaceable, unarmed and posed no threat to the accused gunman.
Dr. Strange
(25,920 posts)The other two were unarmed.
Kid Berwyn
(14,891 posts)niyad
(113,275 posts)Wingus Dingus
(8,052 posts)The two unarmed victims were conducting a peaceful and lawful protest when Rittenhouse decided to murder them when they apparently tried to disarm him. I hope there are witnesses to the first murder, the second murder happened when the brave victim attempted to take the assault rifle away from him to prevent others from being killed by the gun nut Rittenhouse. Unfortunately, the victim didn't succeed and was shot dead by the suspect. I wonder if the judge disallowed the prosecution from using the word "suspect" as well?
Clearly, this judge has an agenda and a background check of his decisions would probably show a pattern of bias.
This is what happens when right wing nationalist politicians allow anyone to carry concealed or openly exposed firearms. I'll bet many police officers, especially in the south, just assume occupants of a car they just pulled over are armed. I would if I were in their shoes. Many people believe by carrying a gun they are protected, what they don't realize is the element of surprise and chaos. It's either too late to respond or they can't handle the stress of shots being fired.
The two unarmed victims were conducting a peaceful and lawful protest when Rittenhouse decided to murder them when they apparently tried to disarm him. I hope there are witnesses to the first murder, the second murder happened when the brave victim attempted to take the assault rifle away from him to prevent others from being killed by the gun nut Rittenhouse. Unfortunately, the victim didn't succeed and was shot dead by the suspect. I wonder if the judge disallowed the prosecution from using the word "suspect" as well?
Clearly, this judge has an agenda and a background check of his decisions would probably show a pattern of bias.
This is what happens when right wing nationalist politicians allow anyone to carry concealed or openly exposed firearms. I'll bet many police officers, especially in the south, just assume occupants of a car they just pulled over are armed. I would if I were in their shoes. Many people believe by carrying a gun they are protected, what they don't realize is the element of surprise and chaos. It's either too late to respond or they can't handle the stress of shots being fired.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,138 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,138 posts)This judge is making bad rulings and is upset that people disagree with these bad rulings
Link to tweet