Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Jilly_in_VA

(9,966 posts)
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 10:10 AM Oct 2021

Men shot by Rittenhouse can't be called 'victims' at trial, judge rules

A Monday decision from a Wisconsin judge about terms lawyers could use in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial is again drawing national attention to the case.

Rittenhouse will go on trial next week for shooting three people, two fatally, during a protest against police brutality last year in Kenosha, about 40 miles southeast of Milwaukee.

Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder has a standard rule prohibiting use of the term "victim" until someone is convicted of a crime, and Schroeder said the people shot by Rittenhouse could not be called victims.

Schroeder was also not swayed by a request from Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger seeking to bar defense lawyers from calling the men "looters, rioters, arsonists or any other pejorative term."

While looting, rioting and arson occurred in the two nights before the shooting, Binger argued that unless there's specific proof the people shot by Rittenhouse engaged in any of those actions, and that Rittenhouse had seen it, the labels are even more "loaded" than what judge ascribes to "victim."

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/10/26/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-judge-victims/8557603002/
_______________________________________________________________
This proves what I have always known about Kenosha (I grew up in Madison). We always knew that Kenosha was corrupt, even back in the 1950s and 60s when it was called "Little Chicago" or "Chicago North"

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Men shot by Rittenhouse can't be called 'victims' at trial, judge rules (Original Post) Jilly_in_VA Oct 2021 OP
another state to avoid samnsara Oct 2021 #1
However Rittenhouse can be referred to as A-Hole. Sneederbunk Oct 2021 #2
Fine, then call them "the people the defendant murdered". louis-t Oct 2021 #3
Or Just 'The Deceased Men'....nt global1 Oct 2021 #5
Or, people torn apart by high powered ammunition Walleye Oct 2021 #7
Or "the people the defendant permanently maimed" Best_man23 Oct 2021 #8
They might as well stop right now. Ray Bruns Oct 2021 #4
That is fucked geardaddy Oct 2021 #6
Can we refer to Rittenhouse as "the defendant," or is that to prejudicial? Orrex Oct 2021 #9

Walleye

(31,016 posts)
7. Or, people torn apart by high powered ammunition
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 10:55 AM
Oct 2021

I keep wondering if the victim testifies, will he be allowed to call himself a victim

Best_man23

(4,897 posts)
8. Or "the people the defendant permanently maimed"
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 01:16 PM
Oct 2021

Don't see where referring to the people shot by the tRump Youth member as being "murdered" or "permanently maimed" is less inflammatory than calling them victims.

Ray Bruns

(4,093 posts)
4. They might as well stop right now.
Wed Oct 27, 2021, 10:47 AM
Oct 2021

Dismiss the charges and Let the little Hitlerjunge go. Save everyone a lot of time and money. This judge is incredibly biased. Same judge who wouldn't revoke Rittenhouse's bond when told the he wasn't living at the address listed on the bond papers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Men shot by Rittenhouse c...