General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMen shot by Rittenhouse can't be called 'victims' at trial, judge rules
A Monday decision from a Wisconsin judge about terms lawyers could use in Kyle Rittenhouse's trial is again drawing national attention to the case.
Rittenhouse will go on trial next week for shooting three people, two fatally, during a protest against police brutality last year in Kenosha, about 40 miles southeast of Milwaukee.
Kenosha County Circuit Judge Bruce Schroeder has a standard rule prohibiting use of the term "victim" until someone is convicted of a crime, and Schroeder said the people shot by Rittenhouse could not be called victims.
Schroeder was also not swayed by a request from Assistant District Attorney Thomas Binger seeking to bar defense lawyers from calling the men "looters, rioters, arsonists or any other pejorative term."
While looting, rioting and arson occurred in the two nights before the shooting, Binger argued that unless there's specific proof the people shot by Rittenhouse engaged in any of those actions, and that Rittenhouse had seen it, the labels are even more "loaded" than what judge ascribes to "victim."
https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2021/10/26/kyle-rittenhouse-trial-judge-victims/8557603002/
_______________________________________________________________
This proves what I have always known about Kenosha (I grew up in Madison). We always knew that Kenosha was corrupt, even back in the 1950s and 60s when it was called "Little Chicago" or "Chicago North"
samnsara
(17,622 posts)Sneederbunk
(14,290 posts)louis-t
(23,292 posts)I'm ok with that.
global1
(25,242 posts)Walleye
(31,016 posts)I keep wondering if the victim testifies, will he be allowed to call himself a victim
Best_man23
(4,897 posts)Don't see where referring to the people shot by the tRump Youth member as being "murdered" or "permanently maimed" is less inflammatory than calling them victims.
Ray Bruns
(4,093 posts)Dismiss the charges and Let the little Hitlerjunge go. Save everyone a lot of time and money. This judge is incredibly biased. Same judge who wouldn't revoke Rittenhouse's bond when told the he wasn't living at the address listed on the bond papers.