COVID's endgame: Scientists have a clue about where SARS-CoV-2 is headed

[Jilly_in_VA]

Back in the 1980s, scientists in the U.K. performed an experiment that — at first glance — sounds unethical. "Volunteers came into the lab and someone squirted virus up their nose," says computational biologist Jennie Lavine.

The researchers took a liquid packed with coronavirus particles and intentionally tried to make 15 volunteers sick.

Ten people got infected. The other five fought off the virus, says Lavine, who's now at the biotechnology company Karius but was at Emory University when she spoke to NPR.

Then the researchers waited a year and repeated the experiment. They wondered: Did getting sick with coronavirus the first time protect people from the second exposure a year later? Or could people get reinfected a year later?

Now this coronavirus injected up the volunteers' noses wasn't SARS-CoV-2, Lavine is quick to point out. "No. No. Nobody got very sick. I think they measured disease severity by how many tissue boxes a person used. The experiment was performed with all of the proper ethical considerations."

https://www.npr.org/sections/goatsandsoda/2021/10/29/1050465159/covids-endgame-scientists-have-a-clue-about-where-sars-cov-2-is-headed
__________________________________________________
I hope they're right!

[HUAJIAO]

1. Good article. Thanks..