Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
6 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

JohnSJ

(92,116 posts)
1. Unfortunately I don't think so, at least on Bloomberg. They are reporting it, but the hosts seem
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 10:48 AM
Nov 2021

more enthusiastic about pushing how oil prices are not going down since the announcement of the release from the strategic petroleum reserves.

CaptainTruth

(6,583 posts)
2. I always wonder how much of the drop is due to benefits expiring.
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 11:50 AM
Nov 2021

In other words, if I understand correctly, "jobless claims" as used in the article are not NEW unemployment claims, they include ongoing claims, so when a person's unemployment benefits run out they're no longer counted as a "jobless claim" because they have no benefit left to claim, but they can still be unemployed.

progree

(10,901 posts)
3. This one goes into detail - the 199,000 figure is new claims
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 12:10 PM
Nov 2021
https://www.democraticunderground.com/10142831191

Then there are continuing claims, 2.049 million, which like you say, some benefits expire and they drop off the continuing claims count.

SergeStorms

(19,192 posts)
5. Baby boomer years: 1946 - 1964
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 05:18 PM
Nov 2021

So I guess we're a little past peak, but not by much. Next up: Generation X.

Dopers_Greed

(2,640 posts)
6. This won't be widely reported
Wed Nov 24, 2021, 07:43 PM
Nov 2021

Since it won't help the mainstream media get their cash cow back into office.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Weekly jobless claims fal...