HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » Maybe it wasn't Ginni who...

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:11 PM

Maybe it wasn't Ginni who Clarence was trying to protect?

Just a though... maybe some of those Trump records have info on him. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Gawd, I hope so!🙋🏻‍♀️

13 replies, 2501 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 13 replies Author Time Post
Reply Maybe it wasn't Ginni who Clarence was trying to protect? (Original post)
Scottie Mom Jan 2022 OP
MLAA Jan 2022 #1
Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #3
MLAA Jan 2022 #9
OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2022 #2
Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #4
Walleye Jan 2022 #5
Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #6
Walleye Jan 2022 #7
Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #8
Diraven Jan 2022 #13
Cha Jan 2022 #10
Joinfortmill Jan 2022 #11
Pas-de-Calais Jan 2022 #12

Response to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:13 PM

1. Ooooh, wouldn't that be nice.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to MLAA (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:16 PM

3. Talk about a payback for Anita Hill.

Thomas’ vote is so odd - at least it hits me that way. Protect a woman???? I cannot see him thinking like that - AT ALL!!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scottie Mom (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:47 PM

9. True, but if the woman he was he was protecting was his wife ...maybe

But I like you idea he was protecting himself 😬. If that’s the case karma was long a long time coming for his ass but still welcome!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:14 PM

2. Given his wife's activism, he should have recused himself.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to OAITW r.2.0 (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:18 PM

4. Maybe she was just the one who could be seen and

He was involved?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:20 PM

5. Considering he never faced any accountability for his sexual harassment of Anita Hill

I wouldn’t be surprised if they had some dirt on him

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Walleye (Reply #5)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:23 PM

6. He should NEVER have gotten a seat on SCOTUS

That POS replaced Thurgood Marshall on top of simply being a sexual harasser and totally unqualified.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scottie Mom (Reply #6)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:24 PM

7. And he perjured himself

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Walleye (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 09:26 PM

8. Absolutely! EOM

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Walleye (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 20, 2022, 12:07 AM

13. So did Kavanaugh

Remember Devil's Triangle was a drinking game? IOKIYAR

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:18 PM

10. Or Both!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:59 PM

11. Me too.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 11:16 PM

12. Question on these types if SCOTUS votes,,

Does each member see the final vote before the vote is sent out for the world to see?

Or do they see the final vote when the world does?

Anyone?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread