General Discussion

Scottie Mom

(5,812 posts) Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:11 PM Jan 2022

Maybe it wasn't Ginni who Clarence was trying to protect?

Just a though... maybe some of those Trump records have info on him. 🤷🏻‍♀️

Gawd, I hope so!🙋🏻‍♀️

13 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Maybe it wasn't Ginni who Clarence was trying to protect? (Original Post) Scottie Mom Jan 2022 OP

Ooooh, wouldn't that be nice. MLAA Jan 2022 #1

Talk about a payback for Anita Hill. Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #3

True, but if the woman he was he was protecting was his wife ...maybe MLAA Jan 2022 #9

Given his wife's activism, he should have recused himself. OAITW r.2.0 Jan 2022 #2

Maybe she was just the one who could be seen and Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #4

Considering he never faced any accountability for his sexual harassment of Anita Hill Walleye Jan 2022 #5

He should NEVER have gotten a seat on SCOTUS Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #6

And he perjured himself Walleye Jan 2022 #7

Absolutely! EOM Scottie Mom Jan 2022 #8

So did Kavanaugh Diraven Jan 2022 #13

Or Both! Cha Jan 2022 #10

Me too. Joinfortmill Jan 2022 #11

Question on these types if SCOTUS votes,, Pas-de-Calais Jan 2022 #12

MLAA

(17,278 posts)

1. Ooooh, wouldn't that be nice.

Reply to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:13 PM

Jan 2022

Scottie Mom

(5,812 posts)

3. Talk about a payback for Anita Hill.

Reply to MLAA (Reply #1)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:16 PM

Jan 2022

Thomas’ vote is so odd - at least it hits me that way. Protect a woman???? I cannot see him thinking like that - AT ALL!!!!

MLAA

(17,278 posts)

9. True, but if the woman he was he was protecting was his wife ...maybe

Reply to Scottie Mom (Reply #3)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:47 PM

Jan 2022

But I like you idea he was protecting himself 😬. If that’s the case karma was long a long time coming for his ass but still welcome!

OAITW r.2.0

(24,455 posts)

2. Given his wife's activism, he should have recused himself.

Reply to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:14 PM

Jan 2022

Scottie Mom

(5,812 posts)

4. Maybe she was just the one who could be seen and

Reply to OAITW r.2.0 (Reply #2)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:18 PM

Jan 2022

He was involved?

Walleye

(31,008 posts)

5. Considering he never faced any accountability for his sexual harassment of Anita Hill

Reply to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:20 PM

Jan 2022

I wouldn’t be surprised if they had some dirt on him

Scottie Mom

(5,812 posts)

6. He should NEVER have gotten a seat on SCOTUS

Reply to Walleye (Reply #5)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:23 PM

Jan 2022

That POS replaced Thurgood Marshall on top of simply being a sexual harasser and totally unqualified.

Walleye

(31,008 posts)

7. And he perjured himself

Reply to Scottie Mom (Reply #6)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:24 PM

Jan 2022

Scottie Mom

(5,812 posts)

8. Absolutely! EOM

Reply to Walleye (Reply #7)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 10:26 PM

Jan 2022

Diraven

(510 posts)

13. So did Kavanaugh

Reply to Walleye (Reply #7)

Thu Jan 20, 2022, 01:07 AM

Jan 2022

Remember Devil's Triangle was a drinking game? IOKIYAR

Cha

(297,140 posts)

10. Or Both!

Reply to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 11:18 PM

Jan 2022

Joinfortmill

(14,416 posts)

11. Me too.

Reply to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Wed Jan 19, 2022, 11:59 PM

Jan 2022

Pas-de-Calais

(9,904 posts)

12. Question on these types if SCOTUS votes,,

Reply to Scottie Mom (Original post)

Thu Jan 20, 2022, 12:16 AM

Jan 2022

Does each member see the final vote before the vote is sent out for the world to see?

Or do they see the final vote when the world does?

Anyone?

Reply to this discussion