General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMore accurate word for "populism" : "assholism"
We would also need forms of the word for different contexts:
Addressing the leader of the movement: "Your Assholiness"
Referring to said leader: "His Assholiness"
Addressing one of the followers: "Hey Asshole!"
Referring to some of the traits that make up the movement: "Assholistic"
Behaviors of the members of the movement: "Assholery"
Insinuating somebody is on the fringe of the movement: "Assholian"
Members of the media, addicted to supporting the movement: "Assoholics"
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)If it hadnt already taken over much of what Americans call their thinking and My Freedoms
sop
(10,154 posts)Republicans' version of "populism" excludes minorities and only benefits white christians. They only support populism when it's combined with their other favorite isms: racism, nationalism, nativism, miltarism, jingoism and capitalism.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)My dream was to create a self sustaining community.. the big plus it would be an asshole free zone.
No narcissists,authoritarians or sociopaths,no addicts or alcoholics( sorry I know its a disease). But this disease causes strife theft and abuse in families and communities.
No arrogant
millionaires. No shit stirrers or busybodies. No people pushing religion or salesman religions. No conservatives or right wingers.
I would have people sign behavioral contract.
It would be a wonderful place.
Yes people would be free to speak thier minds but there is a crossover point where having strong opinions turns abusive.
It would be flexible but no abuse.
Since assholes have the rest of the entire world.
I should make an asshole free zone without them in it.
lagomorph777
(30,613 posts)I lived alone.
I hope I met all my criteria.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)left because she wanted to live near her sisters and brothers in VA.
There were some bumps in the road.
But it was successful.
Those years when all was well were the best years of my life.
Now that the house has been sold to pay for the house my mom bought in VA,it since has ceased to be.
And the people who lived in " the fortress"with me are still my best friends.
And they now dream of creating asshole free zones of thier own.
WarGamer
(12,430 posts)Most progressives have a lot of populist viewpoints.
https://www.fpri.org/article/2020/06/populism-in-american-elections-bernie-sanders-and-donald-trump/
https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2018-12-31/the-year-progressive-populism-roared-back-in-america
In the last few years, populism had to sit and watch as political pundits applied her name to a trend of right-wing movements worldwide, some of which might have been more aptly served by the appellations xenophobic, solipcistic, and racist (see Brazil, Italy
the United States.)
But in 2018, progressive populism roared back. On the last day of 2018, Massachusetts Senator Elizabeth Warren announced she is exploring a run for president, with what Waleed Shahid of the group Justice Democrats described as a message of multiracial populism, in The New York Times.
And Sen. Sherrod Brown:
Its important that Democratic progressives make a distinction between President Trumps phony populism and a true populist message, which does not divide on racial or religious lines.
Boomerproud
(7,951 posts)Why aren't they doing it?
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,323 posts)flavor it is.
WarGamer
(12,430 posts)And Sen. Sherrod Brown:
Its important that Democratic progressives make a distinction between President Trumps phony populism and a true populist message, which does not divide on racial or religious lines.
WhiskeyGrinder
(22,323 posts)Populism relies on the idea that only certain kinds of people are "real" or "ordinary," and while the definition depends on a variety of things (including one's own identity), as a result it relies on some people being "others." As a stand-alone political ideology, it's vague, tricky and poorly defined; as a frame or flavor on other ideologies, it ultimately ends up diluting them.
WarGamer
(12,430 posts)But I certainly think populism has a place in politics, particularly progressive politics.
The country is ALREADY divided between the rich and poor... so identifying "ordinary hard working Americans" as the US-Group is appropriate while calling the "wealthy billionaires" the OTHER-Group...
Populists highlight and contrast the two groups to motivate groups of supporters.
And the truth is... the poor in this country have legitimate reason to feel forgotten, to feel abandoned.
Populist POLICIES can bring relief to that group.