General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIllinois Attorney General Intervenes in Rape Case That Went Viral
At a January sentencing hearing for an 18-year-old convicted of sexually assaulting a 16-year-old girl, an Adams County, Illinois, judge reversed his own conviction so the teen, Drew Clinton, wouldnt have to serve prison time. The sexual assault charge came with a mandatory minimum sentence of four years in prison, but Judge Robert Adrian said that Clinton had no prior record and already served 148 days in county jail, which he said was plenty of punishment, so he threw out the conviction and released him. The girls father told Jezebel that she had been suicidal after the assault and the judge overturning the conviction opened the wound again.
The case generated national headlines, and the judge was reassigned to civil, not criminal, cases. A Change.org petition calling on the Illinois Courts Commission to censure, suspend, or remove Judge Adrian has more than 102,000 signatures.
Now the state attorney general is getting involved. Yesterday, Illinois AG Kwame Raoul filed a petition urging the Illinois Supreme Court to order the judge to sentence Clinton in accordance with state law.
Raoul said in a statement: The mandatory sentencing range set by the Illinois General Assembly for felony criminal sexual assault is four to 15 years in prison. In addition to the insensitivity to the victim in this case, the judges decision to vacate the conviction and call the 148 days Clinton served in county jail plenty of punishment, demonstrates an abuse of power. He also wrote in the complaint that, by refusing to enforce a criminal statute, Judge Adrian acted as a quasi-legislator and undermin[ed] confidence in the judicial process.
https://jezebel.com/illinois-attorney-general-intervenes-in-rape-case-that-1848522791
_____________________________________________________________________
I had not seen this news anywhere else
iemanja
(53,027 posts)about these rapist judges. You know their decisions to set men free for rape stems from their own belief that the behavior is acceptable.
niyad
(113,229 posts)liberalla
(9,234 posts)liberalla
(9,234 posts)in his own past, and doesn't see it as all that serious... (it's acceptable, as you said).
* Perhaps...
just a guess, but not so far fetched...
plimsoll
(1,668 posts)Social status? Church affiliation, who knows. We can be sure that he viewed the victim as an "other." I sincerely doubt he would have done this if the identification had been reversed.
BComplex
(8,029 posts)He would certainly have sympathy for the rapist.
Tommymac
(7,263 posts)I hope he is removed and disbarred.
keithbvadu2
(36,740 posts)Has the judge previously done this in similar cases?
Is there some social relationship between the judge and the rapist's family?
Lunabell
(6,075 posts)Sexual predators rarely, if ever can be rehabilitated. I'm not just talking out my ass either. Evidence backs me up.
https://smart.ojp.gov/somapi/chapter-7-effectiveness-treatment-adult-sex-offenders
And many escalate their violence toward their victims. I watch enough ID tv to know his next step may be to eliminate the witness. Time to make mandatory 20 year sentences for some sexual offenders. And a LONG probation period.
BunnyMcGee
(463 posts)Same here, but welcome news.
justhanginon
(3,289 posts)Certainly a far cry from when Rauner was in office. I hope we can keep them in office next election.