Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

spanone

(135,795 posts)
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:10 PM Jan 2012

Santorum charity for the poor spent most of its money on management, political friends

so, rick's a phony too...

----------

As Republicans gathered for their national convention in Philadelphia a decade ago, Rick Santorum, who was then an up-and-coming senator from Pennsylvania, launched a charity he said would improve the lives of low-income residents in his home state.

“Wouldn’t it be a great thing to leave something positive behind other than a bunch of parties and a bunch of garbage?” Santorum told a local reporter.

But homeless families and troubled children were not the biggest beneficiaries of “Operation Good Neighbor.” Instead, the foundation spent most of its money to run itself, including hundreds of thousands of dollars in fees for fundraising, administration and office rental paid to Santorum’s political allies.

The charity also had significant overlap with the senator’s campaigns and his work on Capitol Hill. Among the leading donors to the foundation were Pennsylvania development and finance firms that had donated to his election efforts and had interests that Santorum had supported in the Senate.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/santorum-charity-for-the-poor-spent-most-of-its-money-on-management-political-friends/2012/01/11/gIQAGDKVwP_story.html

13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Santorum charity for the poor spent most of its money on management, political friends (Original Post) spanone Jan 2012 OP
I am not surprissed riverbendviewgal Jan 2012 #1
That's just dang criminal. I'd love to hear his explanation. Hoyt Jan 2012 #2
Problem is, it's NOT criminal. DCKit Jan 2012 #4
they should reverse the percentages spanone Jan 2012 #5
Well, I figured that is why all these repubs have charities. EC Jan 2012 #3
GOP SOP. tanyev Jan 2012 #10
That's the efficiency of private industry being turned loose on the social safety net. Crankie Avalon Jan 2012 #6
I've thought for a while that Santorum's piousness... RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #7
I heard it mentioned recently that Santorum "invented K St." DCKit Jan 2012 #8
Oh, I'm certainly not convinced... RevStPatrick Jan 2012 #9
more.... spanone Jan 2012 #11
You mean actual poor people should have benefited? nobodyspecial Jan 2012 #12
K & R n/t Tx4obama Jan 2012 #13
 

DCKit

(18,541 posts)
4. Problem is, it's NOT criminal.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:33 PM
Jan 2012

Charities have to spend <10% on actual charity to qualify.

As sad as that is, it is the law.

EC

(12,287 posts)
3. Well, I figured that is why all these repubs have charities.
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:23 PM
Jan 2012

To pay themselves large salaries for administrative needs.

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
7. I've thought for a while that Santorum's piousness...
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:45 PM
Jan 2012

...his self-righteousness and his anti-gay rhetoric may be nothing more than a cover for and distraction from his utter corruptness. You know, act like such a total ass-hat to throw his enemies off the scent of what he REALLY cares about, which is enriching himself and his cronies.

Does he really believe and care about all the stupid things that he says?

 

RevStPatrick

(2,208 posts)
9. Oh, I'm certainly not convinced...
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 03:50 PM
Jan 2012

...that he doesn't believe his crap, but you never know.

Besides, when it comes down to it, isn't the K Street Project really all about the money?

spanone

(135,795 posts)
11. more....
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 05:53 PM
Jan 2012

Before it folded in 2007, the foundation raised $2.58 million, with 39 percent of that donated directly to groups helping the needy. By industry standards, such philanthropic groups should be donating nearly twice that, from 75 to 85 percent of their funds.

“That’s exceptionally poor,” Ken Berger, president of Charity Navigator, a national organization that rates charitable groups, said of the group’s giving. “We would tell donors to run with fear from this organization.”

Santorum campaign adviser John Brabender said the former senator remains proud of the cause he championed.

nobodyspecial

(2,286 posts)
12. You mean actual poor people should have benefited?
Fri Jan 13, 2012, 07:07 PM
Jan 2012

That's the problem with a lot of these society page charities -- a bunch of rich people throwing fancy parties for themselves and then patting themselves on the back.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Santorum charity for the ...