Super Cuts! Military Budget, Not Social Spending, Prompts Media Concern
Published on Friday, January 13, 2012 by [font color="red"]
Fairness & Accuracy In Reporting (FAIR)[/font]
Super Cuts! Military Budget, Not Social Spending, Prompts Media Concern
by Peter Hart
The failure of the Congressional supercommittee to come up with a $1.2 trillion, 10-year deficit reduction plan means that automatic trigger cuts might take place in discretionary spendingroughly half of which is supposed to come from the military budget. Corporate media have given extensive time to panicked warnings about the dangerous impact of military cuts, but made little mention of the effects of cutting other spending.
Under the trigger plan, the military budget is supposed to be reduced by almost $600 billion over the next decadea move Republican politicians have vowed to block. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta has been quoted widely about this catastrophic possibility that would tear a seam in the nations defenses, decrying the reliance on a crazy doomsday mechanism and a goofy meat-ax approach (Washington Post, 11/4/11).
That message has been heardand repeatedacross the media. A Washington Post editorial (11/7/11) called the potential military cuts an unconscionable act of political irresponsibility. ABC correspondent Jack Tapper (11/22/11) talked about draconian cuts to the Pentagon budget.
On the CBS Evening News (11/22/11), Pentagon correspondent David Martin discussed Panettas dire letter to Congress before reporting that the across-the-board cuts would, according to the Pentagon, mean the loss of a million or more jobs in the defense industry, increasing unemployment by one percent. Those jobs figures have been challenged by experts outside the Pentagon (CNN.com, 11/3/11). ..................(more)
The complete piece is at:
http://www.commondreams.org/view/2012/01/13