50 PEOPLE

[Cheezoholic]

50 PEOPLE are enabling these atrocities to happen. . In a country of 300 million, 50 PEOPLE refuse to do whats right. 50 PEOPLE put their greed ahead of Americas children. 50 PEOPLE are willingly, nefariously, insouciantly standing by while thousands of YOUR children die.

50 PEOPLE

POUND that message

[Skittles]

1. and what percentage of the population do they represent

and I have zero doubt they all consider themselves PRO-LIFE CHRISTIANS

[betsuni]

2. I've really happy to see this on the news, that it's Republicans.

[Tickle]

3. More like 51/52

Does it matter at this point? WV love their guns Manchin would side with them

[Cheezoholic]

4. Yeah it does, dont complicate the simple message

50 People are choosing themselves over the children of this country. Pound that message, not Manchinisms who cares about him. 50 People

[CentralMass]

5. If it walks like a duck

https://thehill.com/news/senate/3492150-manchin-throwing-a-wrench-into-democrats-push-for-broader-gun-control/

[Cheezoholic]

7. Give me a BREAK!!!!

50 PEOPLE are blocking this, not that asshole! You are truly barking up the wrong tree man and are really not getting it. 50 People!

[CentralMass]

11. The article speaks for itself.

[Cheezoholic]

15. No, the article lets the other 50 off the hook

by us blaming that prick for everything. Fucking civics 101

[FoxNewsSucks]

17. im not letting those fifty of the hook, but

They couldn't block it without help from politician who are supposed to be on our side

[betsuni]

18. +1

[CentralMass]

27. The post that you replied to above (to start this,) said "More like 51/52". It did not say 1 or

single out Manchin as you are implying and the article tgst posted from the Hill mentioned Manchin blocking President Biden ,( and rhe rest of the party's) broader agenda. You are fighting awfully hard to defend Manchin. A lot could have been accomplished in these last 16 months if Manchin and or Sinema did not kill the ability of the Democratic house the other 48 in the Senate and Presudent Biden from passing much more aggressive I frastructure and BBB bills.

Manchin made himself part of tge problem and he owns it.

[radical noodle]

23. The fact is that if 50 more of them

vote for gun safety, it would pass easily.

[Tickle]

6. True nt

[634-5789]

8. Well read! I'm pounding that message!

Cheezoholic NAILED IT.

[Novara]

9. 51

Why NOT call out Manchin? He is as craven as any republican.

[Cheezoholic]

12. Sure lets blame it all on him

So the other 50 can too. Man you people are so freaking naive

[Novara]

19. You are wearing blinders

Yes, it's the 50 senators but it's also Manchin. No one said blame it only on Manchin.

Hey, here's an idea: let's blame it on EVERY senator who refuses to implement any gun safety laws. That's 51 of them. Right?

[JI7]

10. It's more than 50 because of the people that vote for them

but they are still less than half but they just have disproportionately more power because of how the system is set up .

[Cheezoholic]

13. What?

You and me cant vote on this. Only the house and the senate can. 50 derelicts in the senate voted down backround checks while saying the Buffalo shooter was nuts. They have proportionately lopsided power in the senate but nearly 80% of voters think backround checks should be required. Hell damn near that many think Roe is right. Sorry, 50 people are stopping this and fuck Manchin, hes not the point.

[Samrob]

14. No. It's 11 people who are to blame. You can only name one of the eleven. nt

[Patton French]

16. Probably more than 50

Plus all their voters.

[Lonestarblue]

20. Not just 50 people.

50 Republicans who refuse to lift a finger to stop this madness. Rather, some of them glorify guns.

[llmart]

21. This is all well and good and a simple message, yes...

but who puts them in office and hands them the power? The voters.

[BobTheSubgenius]

22. The Second Amendment "debate" is like Kafka rewrote Waiting For Godot.

What a powerful way of expressing it.

[tiredtoo]

24. Actually it's 52

If you count the two remaining Dixiecrats.

[librechik]

25. PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE BE SPECIFIC!! REPUBLICANS!! ALWAYS SAY "REPUBLICANS"

Too many are making this (admittedly poetic) statement. WE HAVE TO SAY REPUBLICANS!!!

Because stupid people don't know who you mean unless you say it. We have not been saying it loud enough or often enough!

Our message can't spread unless we are specific. This is my campaign today because not enough people are blaming the actual people-- REPUBLICANS!

SAY THEIR NAME!!!

[crickets]

28. +1000000

[Generic Brad]

26. This is about power?

Bull crap. The power to blindly stop progress and say no is not power. If anything, they exercise their power to line their pockets. That’s not power. It is unvarnished greed.