Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRecent legislation requires firms to declare that they don't "discriminate" against the firearm indu
The Texas Law That Has Banks Saying They Dont Discriminate Against GunsRecent legislation requires firms to declare that they dont discriminate against the firearm industry or risk losing lucrative business with the state.
Four years ago, JPMorgan Chase joined some of the nations largest banks in publicly distancing itself from the firearm industry after a mass shooting in Parkland, Fla., left 17 people dead.
JPMorgans relationships with gunmakers have come down significantly and are pretty limited, Marianne Lake, then the banks chief financial officer, told reporters. We do have robust risk management practices and policies associated with this, she said.
The bank, along with Citigroup and other Wall Street firms, did not completely shut the door on gun companies.
In a letter sent to the Texas attorney general this month, JPMorgan, the nations largest bank, signaled its willingness to continue working with the firearm industry. The letter described the banks longstanding business relationships with the industry in the state, noting that it anticipates continuing such relationships into the future.
The letter, which was sent by lawyers representing the bank from the firm Foley & Lardner on May 13, was in response to a new law in Texas that bars state agencies from working with a firm that discriminates against companies or individuals in the gun industry. One provision of the law requires banks and other professional-services firms to submit written affirmations that they comply with the law.
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/05/28/business/dealbook/texas-banks-gun-law.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1081 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Recent legislation requires firms to declare that they don't "discriminate" against the firearm indu (Original Post)
Demovictory9
May 2022
OP
DFW
(54,341 posts)1. My bank in Dallas never discriminates againt guns
Any gun 18 years old or older who can answer a few simple questions, sign its name to a legally binding document, produce a legal place of residence, and produce at least one valid government-issued photo ID (driver's license or passport preferred, but student ID issued by any local university also accepted) is certainly welcome to open account there.
LeftInTX
(25,238 posts)2. Gosh! I hate this state!
Irish_Dem
(46,910 posts)3. Special protection to those who are destroying and terrorizing Americans.
The sociopaths on this planet are destroying the planet and its inhabitants.
Kid Berwyn
(14,876 posts)4. Discrimination
VRWC sure knows how to steal a term and turn it into a dog whistle.
dalton99a
(81,444 posts)5. Kick
These commercial relationships are important and valuable, JPMorgan added. Since the beginning of 2020, the bank has led the financing for deals that raised $708 million for companies in the gun industry, according to data from Dealogic.
Citigroup, which restricted certain types of sales of firearms and ammunition with its credit and debit card systems after Parkland, filed a similar letter with the Texas attorney general in October. In it, Citi stated that it did not have a practice, policy, guidance or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association.
The stakes are high for big banks. If a bank states that it is in compliance with the law and is found to be otherwise, it could face criminal prosecution. It could also be shut out of the states giant municipal bond market. Texas is one of the biggest bond issuers in the country, and Wall Street has long made lucrative and relatively risk-free fees underwriting municipal bonds. With $50 billion in annual borrowing, Texas generated $315 million in fees last year alone for financial firms, according to data from Bloomberg.
From 2015 to 2020, JPMorgan underwrote 138 Texas bond deals, raising $19 billion for the state and generating nearly $80 million in fees for the bank, according to Bloomberg data. But the bank has been shut out of working for the state since the law went into effect in September. This month, JPMorgan submitted a bid to underwrite a $3.4 billion bond issue for utilities, the largest in the states history. It would not be able to secure that contract until it is certified under the new law, known as S.B. 19.
Citigroup, which restricted certain types of sales of firearms and ammunition with its credit and debit card systems after Parkland, filed a similar letter with the Texas attorney general in October. In it, Citi stated that it did not have a practice, policy, guidance or directive that discriminates against a firearm entity or firearm trade association.
The stakes are high for big banks. If a bank states that it is in compliance with the law and is found to be otherwise, it could face criminal prosecution. It could also be shut out of the states giant municipal bond market. Texas is one of the biggest bond issuers in the country, and Wall Street has long made lucrative and relatively risk-free fees underwriting municipal bonds. With $50 billion in annual borrowing, Texas generated $315 million in fees last year alone for financial firms, according to data from Bloomberg.
From 2015 to 2020, JPMorgan underwrote 138 Texas bond deals, raising $19 billion for the state and generating nearly $80 million in fees for the bank, according to Bloomberg data. But the bank has been shut out of working for the state since the law went into effect in September. This month, JPMorgan submitted a bid to underwrite a $3.4 billion bond issue for utilities, the largest in the states history. It would not be able to secure that contract until it is certified under the new law, known as S.B. 19.
eppur_se_muova
(36,258 posts)6. If TX won't do business with these banks, time to call their loans due.
Make it clear that no further loans will be forthcoming, either.