General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumswtf, why does msnbc have on an anti-abortion person on rambling about how great today is????
this pisses me off so much., wtf msnbc
USALiberal
(10,877 posts)Voltaire2
(13,009 posts)maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)actually does practice objectivity. In fact they make a point of it, and that's not a bad thing.
Allowing a Gish Gallop of anti-choice talking points, though, is not.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)MiniMe
(21,714 posts)RANDYWILDMAN
(2,668 posts)she is so full of shit it's coming out her ears.
Jansing you are better then this are you not ?
Polly Hennessey
(6,793 posts)Always been to the right. Listen carefully to the questions she asks.
aeromanKC
(3,322 posts)OnDoutside
(19,953 posts)what it comes down to. RWNJs used the law to get to today, while liberals slept. Get out there and join one of the many pro choice groups that will be working on this.
Turbineguy
(37,319 posts)onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)HAB911
(8,880 posts)inthewind21
(4,616 posts)is why they are talking about the SC plans to come after marriage equality yet they don't mention why the SC left out Loving. To make clear, in no way, form or fashion do I want Loving overturned. What I do want is to have it pointed out repeatedly the utter hypocrisy of conveniently leaving that landmark case unmentioned. Basically the SC saying, if it protects me, it's sacred, you, not so much.
Midnight Writer
(21,745 posts)Corgigal
(9,291 posts)Just happy shell probably be unemployed now.
MOMFUDSKI
(5,500 posts)are they not talking about rudy tutti having been visited by the Feds this morning and they confiscated his electronics?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)I want any source to be like Fox. Good sources are HONEST, not biased.
My favorite ones are so impartial and committed to informing viewers that I have trouble identifying their ideology.