Trumps crimes have become so severe, so dangerous, making Garlands political decision moot..

[fightforfreedom]

At this point, not indicting Trump would harm our country more than indicting him. Legally, Garland has more than enough evidence to charge Trump with multiple felonies. Our long history of never indicting a president may be coming to an end. Trump has given Garland no other choice. Trump at this moment is still trying to obstruct justice. He is still inciting violence. He must be removed from our society.

Hang on tight, it's going to be a hell of a ride.

[spooky3]

1. Claire McCaskill agrees with you.

So do I.

[empedocles]

13. McCskill does not agree. She has long clearly stated that

an unsuccessful prosecution does more harm than no prosecution.

The need is for a very clear conviction.

[spooky3]

16. She said tonight on MSNBC that she is now convinced

Last edited Wed Jun 29, 2022, 12:40 PM - Edit history (1)

That it would be better to prosecute than not to do so. Maybe you missed her saying that. She said it to Nicolle Wallace.

On edit: she tweeted this:

Link to tweet

?s=21&t=USGJ6Y7VQsvcO8AGHJd8pw

[rzemanfl]

2. Moot. n/t

[fightforfreedom]

8. Thank you.

[rzemanfl]

9. You're welcome. Sometimes technology is not our friend. n/t

[XanaDUer2]

3. Yup nt

[jcgoldie]

4. moot

...

[DBoon]

5. didn't you mean to write "moot" instead of "mute"?

moot - deprived of practical significance : made abstract or purely academic

mute: unable to speak : lacking the power of speech

[Rebl2]

6. Absolutely!

[tulipsandroses]

7. No one should be above the law. His crimes are worse than Nixon

How bad does it have to get for a president to be held accountable? Murder?
Well he did say he could kill somebody on Fifth Ave.

[FakeNoose]

10. Did I hear somebody mention our ol' buddy Nixon?

I think this clip is from "60 Minutes"

[yorkster]

14. It's the massive scope of it all. Global - no comparison to Watergate.

The whole 2016 Russian mess is just a small part of the big picture. Seditious conspiracy, obstruction of justice, unending financial grift, and on and on. It seems like a mega Rico case, among other things.

[iemanja]

11. Are you saying criminal prosecution doesn't matter?

Because that is what Garland controls.

[fightforfreedom]

12. What?????

[iemanja]

15. How can Garland's decision be moot?

if one cares about prosecution?

[usonian]

17. I *think* that the OP means

that Garland's decision is forced, making any political concerns ( "looks" ) moot/meaningless.

IMO, TFG is in Jefferson Davis territory,
AND MORE PEOPLE IN HIGH PLACES SHOULD SAY SO.


Not just the rubes who know it and are proud of it.