Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:22 AM
hedda_foil (16,086 posts)
Supreme Court Rules that EPA can't regulate emissions.Supreme Court curbs EPA's ability to fight climate change Source: CNN The Supreme Court curbed the Environmental Protection Agency's ability to broadly regulate carbon emissions from existing power plants, a major defeat for the Biden administration's attempts to slash emissions at a moment when scientists are sounding alarms about the accelerating pace of global warming. In addition, the court cut back agency authority in general invoking the so-called "major questions" doctrine -- a ruling that will impact the federal government's authority to regulate in other areas of climate policy, as well as regulation of the internet and worker safety. The ruling was 6-3. Chief Justice John Roberts wrote the opinion for the conservative majority, with the three liberal justices dissenting. This story is breaking and will be updated. Read more: https://www.cnn.com
|
21 replies, 1443 views
![]() |
Author | Time | Post |
![]() |
hedda_foil | Jun 2022 | OP |
OrlandoDem2 | Jun 2022 | #1 | |
dchill | Jun 2022 | #2 | |
RKP5637 | Jun 2022 | #3 | |
Diamond_Dog | Jun 2022 | #4 | |
ProudMNDemocrat | Jun 2022 | #5 | |
Igel | Jun 2022 | #19 | |
Ocelot II | Jun 2022 | #6 | |
sop | Jun 2022 | #12 | |
Ocelot II | Jun 2022 | #15 | |
The Magistrate | Jun 2022 | #16 | |
emulatorloo | Jun 2022 | #7 | |
Kid Berwyn | Jun 2022 | #8 | |
dchill | Jun 2022 | #9 | |
c-rational | Jun 2022 | #10 | |
d_b | Jun 2022 | #11 | |
intheflow | Jun 2022 | #14 | |
Bayard | Jun 2022 | #13 | |
Deminpenn | Jun 2022 | #17 | |
Novara | Jun 2022 | #18 | |
Igel | Jun 2022 | #20 | |
RANDYWILDMAN | Jun 2022 | #21 |
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:23 AM
OrlandoDem2 (1,944 posts)
1. May the 6 Reich wing justices burn in hell...after we all burn on Earth!
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:24 AM
dchill (34,737 posts)
2. The Extreme Court strikes again!
Conservative=insane.
|
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:24 AM
RKP5637 (64,490 posts)
3. They want to speed ahead toward their rapture. Pollute earth beyond life. n/t
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:29 AM
Diamond_Dog (26,453 posts)
4. I hate being under the thumb of these idiots
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:31 AM
ProudMNDemocrat (13,130 posts)
5. What the fuck is the purposes of the EPA?
If it cannot regulate the amount of pollutants that go into the atmosphere? Or in the water we drink?
Expand the Court! |
Response to ProudMNDemocrat (Reply #5)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 02:02 PM
Igel (33,319 posts)
19. It can.
Just not carbon dioxide from pre-existing sources, using the text of the particular law that they claimed gave them authority.
|
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:32 AM
Ocelot II (105,738 posts)
6. It really has little to do with the environment. The court is trying to restrict
or even eliminate the delegation doctrine completely - how broad is the ability of federal agencies to enact rules.
|
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #6)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:10 AM
sop (8,927 posts)
12. This decision will also affect other government agencies.
"The Delegation doctrine is a principle limiting Congress's ability to transfer its legislative power to another governmental branch, especially the executive branch. This is based on the separation-of-powers concept. It says that the power to declare whether or not there shall be a law, to determine the general policy to be achieved by the law, and to fix the limits within the limits within which the law shall operate is vested by the constitution in the legislature and it shall not be delegated. Therefore any statute conferring excessive legislative power is invalid because it is unconstitutional to delegate powers. Delegation is permitted only if Congress prescribes clear and adequate standards to guide an executive agency in making the policy."
|
Response to sop (Reply #12)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:32 AM
Ocelot II (105,738 posts)
15. Exactly. Conservatives have always hated the delegation doctrine.
Response to Ocelot II (Reply #6)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:32 AM
The Magistrate (93,162 posts)
16. Exactly, Ma'am
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:36 AM
emulatorloo (40,736 posts)
7. They rule on whim, not the law.
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:37 AM
Kid Berwyn (11,078 posts)
8. An homage to Big Oil & Cars.
While responsible for making the planet inhospitable to life, now immune.
|
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:37 AM
dchill (34,737 posts)
9. Their ultimate position is that Federal Government is not...
...a thing. Only the States, in their ultimate wisdom, can make any law or regulation. And of course regulation is bad because it might be applied to a militia - or other religion-related activity.
The Supreme Court has today proved that they are bad for civilization. Congratulations. |
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 09:51 AM
c-rational (2,320 posts)
10. Another gut punch. These radicals need to be run out of town.
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:04 AM
d_b (7,434 posts)
11. SCOTUS making shit up as they go
The Republicans who made shit up to get them there. Denying precedent, lying under oath, and turning the court into a right-wing cookie jar.
And now pollution has more rights than women. It’s an illegitimate court — pack the motherfucker. Fight back, or hand the party over to those with the stomach for it. Enough is enough. |
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:21 AM
Bayard (17,717 posts)
13. I have a problem with portraying the sane justices,
As the, "liberal," judges. I have to worry about their blood pressure levels, with trying to maintain their sanity at this point.
|
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:40 AM
Deminpenn (14,757 posts)
17. SCOTUS is too late
Too much is environmental policy is already baked in. Only the dying WVa coal industry continues to want to pollute.
US industry discovered awhile ago that polluting the enviroment is bad for business. Capitalism at work as it were. |
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 10:42 AM
Novara (4,454 posts)
18. By all means, let's not let scientists do their jobs. Let's leave it up to people who know nothing..
.... about pollutants and what they do to people and the environment.
As an environmental scientist this infuriates me. Of course, everything the court does infuriates me. |
Response to Novara (Reply #18)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 02:04 PM
Igel (33,319 posts)
20. The court said that Biden can end the "remain in Mexico" policy.
That statute and Constitution were fairly clear, as written, giving the President that authority.
|
Response to hedda_foil (Original post)
Thu Jun 30, 2022, 02:06 PM
RANDYWILDMAN (2,354 posts)
21. Another decision for the rich and powerful
great job supreme court very consistent
![]() ![]() ![]() |