HomeLatest ThreadsGreatest ThreadsForums & GroupsMy SubscriptionsMy Posts
DU Home » Latest Threads » Forums & Groups » Main » General Discussion (Forum) » I think the committee kno...

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:08 PM

I think the committee knows who tampered with witnesses. This is big.

Cheney is saying they may send criminal referrals to The DOJ. The traitors are committing more crimes trying to protect themselves. That never ends well.

25 replies, 5165 views

Reply to this thread

Back to top Alert abuse

Always highlight: 10 newest replies | Replies posted after I mark a forum
Replies to this discussion thread
Arrow 25 replies Author Time Post
Reply I think the committee knows who tampered with witnesses. This is big. (Original post)
fightforfreedom Jun 2022 OP
CentralMass Jun 2022 #1
getagrip_already Jun 2022 #14
LiberalFighter Jun 2022 #16
gratuitous Jun 2022 #2
triron Jun 2022 #5
calimary Jun 2022 #18
Novara Jun 2022 #3
Deep State Witch Jun 2022 #4
JCMach1 Jun 2022 #6
KarenS Jun 2022 #8
brush Jun 2022 #12
meadowlander Jun 2022 #7
usonian Jun 2022 #9
Emile Jun 2022 #10
H2O Man Jun 2022 #11
FakeNoose Jun 2022 #13
Pinback Jul 2022 #21
FakeNoose Jul 2022 #23
ashredux Jun 2022 #15
czarjak Jun 2022 #17
dflprincess Jun 2022 #19
Captain Zero Jun 2022 #20
scipan Jul 2022 #22
barbtries Jul 2022 #24
RocRizzo55 Jul 2022 #25

Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:11 PM

1. I appreciate your optimism.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to CentralMass (Reply #1)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:39 PM

14. This is the kind of thing the doj would pursue....

It's likely some outside third party, not an insider who sent the texts. Maybe even a lawyer, or possibly, a congressional staffer.

While the doj is struggling with a lack of spine when it comes to family and close insiders, they seem willing to charge outsiders and small players.

This may get picked up if the house refers it.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to getagrip_already (Reply #14)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:46 PM

16. I figure it is more higher up

And should be easy to break when they understand they won't get a pardon.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:27 PM

2. The committee has delivered on its previews

The committee has not overpromised its testimony and evidence and they've been very scrupulous about following through. This mention of witness tampering wouldn't have gone public if they didn't have the goods.

People who have yoked their defense counsel to the former guy's attorneys should take a hard look at Hutchinson's testimony this week and ask themselves if what's best for the former guy is what's best for them. Before they walk into the thresher blades, that is. Because once the former guy decides to sell you out (and he will), you'll find the advice you're getting from your bought-and-paid-for-by-the-former-guy attorney aligns with his interests rather than yours.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to gratuitous (Reply #2)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:32 PM

5. Yes you're so right

Don't like waiting until mid July for another hearing.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to triron (Reply #5)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 02:23 PM

18. Well, if it's any consolation, July starts tomorrow.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:30 PM

3. Oh, I am absolutely sure they have the receipts

It isn't a coincidence that they ended Tuesday's hearing with witness tampering. That's a preview of what's to come. Cheney specifically said she wasn't going to name the individuals when she read the messages Tuesday but be certain she knows exactly who they are.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:31 PM

4. Gotta Be

Roger Stone. This is just the kind of thing that he would do.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:36 PM

6. Liz wasn't playing... She was putting them on notice the end of the last hearing

She may not be my ideology, but she's a savage for democracy...

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JCMach1 (Reply #6)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:42 PM

8. I like that,,,, savage for democracy. n/t

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to JCMach1 (Reply #6)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:18 PM

12. She's a warrior all right, a throwback to old school repubs who Dems...

could cut deals with.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 12:37 PM

7. Of course they do. They were redacting their names from the statements they read.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:13 PM

9. The cover-up always exceeds the crime, is more transparent, and backfires. nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:17 PM

10. Many times the coverup is worse than the crime.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:18 PM

11. Recommended.

I agree.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:22 PM

13. Well if the texts were sent to Cassidy, and I believe they were

... all they needed to do was look on her phone or her emails.

If other witnesses have shared their phones and emails, probably (I'm sure) there's a pattern to the threats.

Liz Cheney is right to mention it, because now they know they've already been caught.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to FakeNoose (Reply #13)

Fri Jul 1, 2022, 10:12 AM

21. It's possible to spoof the sending #

but the intimidation is stronger if the recipient knows who itís coming from. So maybe they didnít try to obfuscate the senderís identity.

Also, of course, these doofuses are both over-confident and technologically inept, so thereís that.

Will be most interesting to see how this plays out. Great job of foreshadowing by the committee.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to Pinback (Reply #21)

Fri Jul 1, 2022, 11:14 AM

23. Yes but we already know that Mark Meadows (her former boss) sent them

When I posted this comment, it hadn't been announced yet.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:40 PM

15. OK ladies and gentlemen, it's time to play Let's Make A Deal!!!

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 01:52 PM

17. Fakers claiming fake news playing the long-game?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 02:56 PM

19. I think we all know who tampered with the witnesses. Nt

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Thu Jun 30, 2022, 03:10 PM

20. It's 20 YEARS IN PRISON IF convicted!

Even for the 'corrupt persuasion' type.

Next up. Jury Tampering. You know he will.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2022, 11:08 AM

22. Meadows and Trump aides: Politico

Meadows is the person whose name was redacted in that slide. Contents of that final deposition were described to POLITICO, which could not independently corroborate the identity of the intermediary or that Meadows directed any message be delivered to Hutchinson before her second deposition.

The other slide the Capitol riot committee unveiled at the end of its hearing with Hutchinson this week quoted an unnamed witness, now known to be the former Trump White House aide herself, describing multiple phone calls she received from allies of the former president.


https://www.politico.com/news/2022/06/30/jan-6-hutchinson-meadows-mystery-messages-00043638

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2022, 11:51 AM

24. they haven't done it yet?

"may"?

come on.

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink


Response to fightforfreedom (Original post)

Fri Jul 1, 2022, 12:07 PM

25. Didn't they grab Eastman's phone the day after?

Could Eastman be the one tampering with witnesses?

Reply to this post

Back to top Alert abuse Link here Permalink

Reply to this thread