General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSupreme Court asks Maryland officials to stop protests outside justices' houses
https://www.cnn.com/2022/07/02/politics/supreme-court-justices-homes-maryland/index.htmlMarshal of the Supreme Court asks Maryland officials to enforce anti-picketing laws
By Ariane de Vogue, CNN Supreme Court Reporter
(CNN) The marshal of the Supreme Court is asking Maryland officials to direct law enforcement to enforce the state's laws prohibiting picketing outside the homes of Supreme Court justices, according to letters sent to Gov. Larry Hogan and Mark Elrich, the county executive of Montgomery County.
"You recently stated that you were 'deeply concerned' that 'hundreds of demonstrators have recently chosen to picket Supreme Court Justices at their homes in...Maryland," the letter to Hogan by Col. Gail A Curley said. "Since then, protest activity at the Justices' homes, as well as threatening activity, has only increased."
The letters, dated Friday and released by a court spokesperson on Saturday to reporters, refer to protests that have taken place "for weeks on end."
They cite the arrest near Justice Brett Kavanaugh's home in June of a man who was later charged by the Justice Department with attempting or threatening to kidnap or murder a US judge. Several Supreme Court justices live in Maryland.
===================================================================================
NEXT: GOP senators propose $6B bill to relocate GOP justices to undisclosed location with moat and alligators
comradebillyboy
(10,134 posts)a precedent to overturn the 1st Amendment.
dalton99a
(81,426 posts)MerryHolidays
(7,715 posts)"Dear" "Justices":
You decided that allowing black money into US politics was a permissible expression of "free speech." Peaceful protest (which I guess six of you may not know too much about) on public grounds is the essence of free speech. Do you need to go back to law school to understand that?
You are reaping what you sowed.
Yours sincerely,
Every decent person in the USA
Brainfodder
(6,423 posts)Sienna86
(2,148 posts)Not that it means anything to certain SC justices.
Solly Mack
(90,761 posts)Samrob
(4,298 posts)"Right to petition the government."
Samrob
(4,298 posts)lpbk2713
(42,750 posts)maybe those demonstrators would not feel compelled to walk on hot asphalt on a 100° day.
DemocratSinceBirth
(99,710 posts)The Magistrate
(95,244 posts)I fail to see what makes these particular poltroons immune from hearing the voice of the people up close and personal, all night long and all the day through....
Hiawatha Pete
(1,796 posts)SWBTATTReg
(22,093 posts)supreme court history. They took away a right. The only time ever!
Thus, they lied, they took away an existing right, they put out an inept decision when they released their decision on overriding Roe, and basically, were 10 cent lawyers chasing after an ambulance.
What they did was cheap a&& lawyering, at its worst.
spanone
(135,802 posts)LetMyPeopleVote
(145,046 posts)In It to Win It
(8,228 posts)MichMan
(11,899 posts)kairos12
(12,849 posts)abortion clinics lived with for decades.
Novara
(5,835 posts)DFW
(54,325 posts)"Protesters Ask Supreme Court Justices to Restore the Rights They Just Took Away"
One will get you the other--in both cases.