General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTo any that would kick Elizabeth now
I can admit, there were times I was angry with her, especially about Diana. However, from her work in the Second World war, to helping form charities, I can say that she was one woman that tried to do her best for her country, which is more than can be said of many. I see many who can buy and sell her in the UK, not trying half as hard to represent their nation.
Best wishes Queen Elizabeth.
PS: Yes I know there is a LOT to be dealt with, from the new PM, to Brexit, to Boris et al. Yes there is the question of who gets to sit on that throne, and all the sordidness involved. I can even be bold to say that neither Charles nor Andrew seem up to the task. But for now, let us mourn the end of an era.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Hell never be in that position.
Freddie
(9,256 posts)After Charles its William, little George, Charlotte and Louis.
ChazII
(6,202 posts)She is now with Phillip.
TheRealNorth
(9,470 posts)I thought we fought a war 240 years ago so that we wouldn't have to care about the King or Queen of England.
hlthe2b
(102,120 posts)It really isn't that difficult.
The debate over monarchy is not OURS to make. And even if we want to weigh in, it can wait. RESPECT...
BuddhaGirl
(3,599 posts)her family story is interesting.
But as an American and citizen of the world, I would like the monarchy to eventually fade away. It perpetuates entitlement and classism, and we don't need that in society.
RIP Elizabeth
hlthe2b
(102,120 posts)And heaven knows, the past few years in this country have not been a hallmark of democracy. So, I think it wise for all Americans to clam up and maybe show some respect for our British allies to determine their own form of government. There is enough for us to focus on here.
BuddhaGirl
(3,599 posts)That said, I am sad for her family. She did have an interesting life.
Happy Hoosier
(7,216 posts)... that there aren;t strong cultural ties with Britain.
And the last time the US and Britain were at odds with each is more than 150 years ago.
Many of us feel deep cultural rootst there. And for some, that includes some cultural affinity for the royals.
But you don;t have to "understand" it. Heck, I don't understand pro sports fans, but there ya go!
TheRealNorth
(9,470 posts)But if you want to talk about cultural roots or heritage, as an American of Irish ancestory, you are talking about celebrating a monarchy that brutally ruled over Ireland and oversaw a famine not unlike the Holomdor, in that British trade policies exacerbated the food shortage caused by the potato blight.
I am not angry or anything about it and don't have any ill will like some of the q-anon folks have. It's just that I find the news obsession a little annoying and I just don't get why. I feel like it's the MSM that pushes us to care.
GenXer47
(1,204 posts)I never understood why the American press covers the UK mascot family. A 96 year old woman died today. The same day we find out the FBI tracked another Queen, the Queen of Soul, as though she were a domestic terrorist:
https://www.theguardian.com/music/2022/sep/08/aretha-franklin-fbi-declassified-file-civil-rights-activism
elocs
(22,542 posts)which you clearly lack so I think I'll just put you on full ignore.
Aristus
(66,286 posts)I'm glad to see that, in this instance at least, the U.S. has made peace with its past.
I'm Southern-born and raised. When a well-regarded old lady dies, we show our respect.
BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)A truly good person.
Im a first generation American with all my relatives in the UK.
Many Americans respected her. With good reason.
2naSalit
(86,323 posts)Human decency. She was far more than the tabloid reputation.
Torchlight
(3,293 posts)as we ourselves determined on an individual level.
RobinA
(9,886 posts)for good and evil, has had a tremendous effect on the world as we know it. This lady was its longest reigning member. Many of us come from there, albeit, many moons ago. Some of us don't HAVE to care, we want to.
hlthe2b
(102,120 posts)about monarchy. It wasn't a choice. She was born to it--even two days before her death.
I feel saddened. I think most Brits will feel that way as well--even if they are staunch anti-royalists. So, I'm hopeful we can be respectful.
jimfields33
(15,692 posts)She was supposed to be fergies kids. Fun and play. But life gave her a hand that was unexpected. She took the hand that she was dealt and went full force with it. To me shes very gutsy and an inspiration for all women. Im surprise nobody has mentioned that she was one of the first female leaders in the world. Thats pretty damn good.
Happy Hoosier
(7,216 posts)Like any person, he has his flaws. But he knows his role, and he will do his duty adequately if not spectacularly.
William will become the Prince of Wales. All is well.
luvs2sing
(2,220 posts)but over 80% of my DNA goes back to the UK, and Im interested in it from a historical perspective. As far as Elizabeth goes, I was always interested in her as a person. As you have mentioned, there is much to admire about her, and she seemed to have her head on fairly straight and have a good sense of humor, not take herself too seriously. I will miss her and her colorful outfits and smile.
Johnny2X2X
(18,969 posts)Seemed like a decent person even as a royal. I just never understood the infatuation some have with monarchies, but it;'s not really the time or place to expand on that.
FakeNoose
(32,579 posts)... thrusting them all into the limelight when "Uncle David" abdicated.
The story was told very well in the movie "The King's Speech" about her father's speech impediment (a nervous stutter) and his reluctance to step into the role that his elder brother had been groomed for. Liz was still quite young and hardly knew what to think. She has lived an amazing life and did pretty well for herself.
Rest in Peace Queen Elizabeth II.
Freddie
(9,256 posts)Uncle David was supposed to find a suitable wife (not a twice-divorced American) and have children who would inherit the throne. She was in the position little Archie and Lilibet are now. I wonder if they will make Harry the Duke of York, normally the title for the monarchs second-born son.
nolabear
(41,932 posts)Many of us ( including me) have a British heritage. We were literally owned by them until the greatest thing we ever didfought for independence. But the link remains through language, custom, memory, relatives.
Of course its changed a great deal, and for the good, as others heritages and cultures have blended with the British one. But the royalty is what many, many fairy tales we grew up with and loved was predicated on. Good, evil, conqueror and conquered, the lens of the British royalty gives us stories to tell, and to identify with.
Retrograde
(10,129 posts)Large swaths of the West and Southwest were Spanish territories, as was Florida. The central part of the country was a French possession. Alaska was purchased from Russia. Hawai'i was its own country. And I'd bet a majority of the population stems from areas other than the British Isles, at least in part.
And yet we keep pushing the Anglo-centric, East Coast driven picture of the US in out history books.
nolabear
(41,932 posts)The fact that the East Coast was developed early on and the government of America began there, with all attendant educational institutes and historians creates the narrative. As I said, the fairy tales are Eurocentric, even those that are history.
jimfields33
(15,692 posts)Probably not a super power. The entire government would have been different and not British influence. We took the British government and made it better. Hence why we are 246 years into this where other governments have failed.
TheRealNorth
(9,470 posts)The creation of which was basically imposed on the Monarchy in 1215 and strengthened after the Glorious Revolution.
I don't want to discount the good things Queen E did, but I don't see how we somehow owe anythng to the British Monarchy. The House of Orange (and later Hanover/Windsor) was basically given the crown after the Stuarts were kicked out with the understanding that Parliament would have increased powers.
My point is, the Monarchy was not some benevolent force. But after the English Civil War and the Glorious Revolution, the supremacy of Parliament over the Monarchy was confirmed, and the Monarchy decided it was in their best interest to compromise instead of fighting another bloody civil war where they would most likely lose.
iemanja
(53,012 posts)There is no question.
InAbLuEsTaTe
(24,121 posts)BlackSkimmer
(51,308 posts)Omg.
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)jimfields33
(15,692 posts)She was a hard fisted leader in a velvet glove. Probably the most powerful woman in human history.
Pathwalker
(6,598 posts)Not a world leader, not the most powerful woman in human history. Queen Victoria? was his Great Grandmother. Is that who you mean?
jimfields33
(15,692 posts)I meant Elizabeth. I guess I should say modern history. Shes a world leader just not in the traditional sense.
Earth-shine
(3,949 posts)I'm generally down on royalty. The queen was the only one I really liked.
And then, there were none.