Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

CaptainTruth

(6,588 posts)
Mon Oct 3, 2022, 01:20 PM Oct 2022

Fourteen-year-old girl denied life-saving prescription refill under Arizona abortion law

Fourteen-year-old girl denied life-saving prescription refill under Arizona abortion law

A teenager in Arizona’s Tucson city was refused a refill of a life-saving prescription drug within 48 hours of Arizona abolishing abortions under its new law, according to her doctor.

The 14-year-old girl, a patient with debilitating rheumatoid arthritis and osteoporosis, had been prescribed the immunosuppressant methotrexate to fight the pain and symptoms of her disease.

But she was refused a refill of the drug after Arizona rolled out its new law against abortions on 24 September, on the basis that the drug can also be used to end ectopic pregnancies.

[link:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/methotrexate-az-abortion-law-teenager-b2191354.html|]

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Fourteen-year-old girl denied life-saving prescription refill under Arizona abortion law (Original Post) CaptainTruth Oct 2022 OP
This has been resolved already. She received her prescription drug. secondwind Oct 2022 #1
Of course she did. And others. It'll continue to pop up, though. Hortensis Oct 2022 #2
exactly, many such things will pop up treestar Oct 2022 #6
Sounded like a good idea if doable. Medical conditions of course have Hortensis Oct 2022 #7
Beyond insane Picaro Oct 2022 #3
+100 mercuryblues Oct 2022 #4
in addition to being so gung ho treestar Oct 2022 #5

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
2. Of course she did. And others. It'll continue to pop up, though.
Mon Oct 3, 2022, 01:24 PM
Oct 2022

Every prescriber should foresee any potential problems and head them off.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
6. exactly, many such things will pop up
Mon Oct 3, 2022, 02:38 PM
Oct 2022

and have to be resolved, leaving people in stress in the meantime. This girl even having a day or two of thinking she cannot treat her condition because the drug can also be used to end pregnancies and ectopic ones at that! These morons do not even understand what ectopic pregnancy is. Someone said it should not be termed a pregnancy, but a medical emergency. Right wingers are all about labels, so get the label pregnancy away.

Hortensis

(58,785 posts)
7. Sounded like a good idea if doable. Medical conditions of course have
Mon Oct 3, 2022, 03:22 PM
Oct 2022

scientific names. I looked for an alternative but only found extrauterine pregnancy. Pregnancy seems to be part of all the legal definitions and laws, so there's no getting away from it. Not that pharmacy staff would be fooled by any term, and it's important that they not be, but still.... Too bad we don't have an alternative to such a politically loaded word.


Picaro

(1,517 posts)
3. Beyond insane
Mon Oct 3, 2022, 01:52 PM
Oct 2022

Last edited Mon Oct 3, 2022, 02:36 PM - Edit history (1)

I don't even know how to process this.

Because methotrexate could be used to end ectopic pregnancies the pharmacy refused to fill the prescription.

That's totally nuts.

An ectopic pregnancy is never viable. If the mother doesn't terminate the non-viable pregnancy she most likely will die.

Ectopic pregnancies won't ever result in a baby. Even the forced birthers should be able to acknowledge this.

But in many states laws making abortion a crime are being written by men that contain no exception for the life of the mother.

Now we have a pharmacist refusing to fill a prescription that could be used to terminate an ectopic pregnancy. What kind of ghoul would be in favor of an ectopic pregnancy?

This has come very far very fast and its only going to get worse unless we can keep both the House and the Senate.

GOTV



mercuryblues

(14,530 posts)
4. +100
Mon Oct 3, 2022, 02:34 PM
Oct 2022

This is why it was never about "saving a baby." This is about 100% control over women and their bodies. In their mind anyone who suffers and/or dies because of their insane laws and beliefs is collateral damage.

treestar

(82,383 posts)
5. in addition to being so gung ho
Mon Oct 3, 2022, 02:37 PM
Oct 2022

that they don't want people to use a drug that could be used for abortions for something else. Above, looks like it was resolved, but it had to be since the first approach was to deny it!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Fourteen-year-old girl de...