General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLemme see if I've got this straight---- a 42 year old white man whose social media is filled with
Last edited Sun Oct 30, 2022, 06:28 PM - Edit history (1)
extreme right-wing memes, conspiracy theories and anti-Democrat posts breaks into Speaker Pelosi's personal residence just after 2:00 a.m. carrying a hammer and a bag containing duct tape and zip ties. He confronts the Speaker's 82 year old husband demanding "WHERE'S NANCY? WHERE'S NANCY?" and attempts to tie up Paul Pelosi. Mr. Pelosi somehow called 911 without being noticed and when police arrived, the attacker told them they were "waiting for Nancy" and then savagely struck Mr. Pelosi numerous times with the hammer, fracturing his skull and doing "serious injury" to his right hand and arm. He was in brain surgery for 5 hours.
And, now, after all the above has been widely reported, WHY do I still have to be sickened by highly paid TV "journalists" wondering aloud about "what could have been this disturbed man's motive?"
Gee, ya don't think the stochastic terrorists spreading the Big Lie and profoundly stupid MAGA-Q conspiracy theories might be just a little bit responsible for "motivating" this violent thug, do ya?
This was an attempt to assassinate Speaker Nancy Pelosi who, fortunately, was in Washington D.C. at the time. Does anyone seriously doubt that the hammer-wielding punk who tried to kill her husband thought he was doing what "President Trump" wanted?
SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)They are setting up insanity plea...
G2theD
(593 posts)Bluethroughu
(5,153 posts)This is ridiculous, these people should be locked the f-#$ up!
They are emboldened by the lack of real prison time from the f-$%ing insurrection.
This will become redundant like mass shootings. There is zero accountability for the MASON minded directors of domestic terrorism. This is subversion, sedition and more than likely treason.
calimary
(81,220 posts)Sure looks, feels, sounds, and smells like one.
Any word on whether the attacker was a line wolf or part of a larger support group?
joshcryer
(62,269 posts)Just beyond tiring.
CentralMass
(15,265 posts)Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)can draw their own inferences until the point that law enforcement establishes the attackers motives conclusively.
That's good journalism.
Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)Demsrule86
(68,552 posts)And a big fat lie. personally, I think liars make bad journalists.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)is bad journalism.
That the difference between respected media sources that vet their stories and Twitter (or DU).
Atticus
(15,124 posts)2.) Journalists are surely capable of explaining what the "apparent" motive was while cautioning that no "official"determination has been announced.
3.) Finally, if it is "bad" or "irresponsible" journalism to report what I suppose you would term "speculation" about motive, why are so many talking heads asking what their guests "think" it might have been?
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Law enforcement investigates crimes and when they feel confident they've established the motives of crimes, they report such.
In the meantime, it is the job of the press to report the facts.
Talking heads are speculating as to motive because many people suck it up.
Based on the reporting, I have my own suppositions as to what happen. But I would not publish them as if they'd been confirmed by a through investigation.
There is a difference. Responsible news agencies understand the difference.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)GreenWave
(6,723 posts)How long did we have to wait until they proved JFK and Oswald did not know each other?
Cunctation in these matters favors the RWNJ as the fervor dies down.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Paul Pelosi was attacked two days ago.
When Elon Musk's conspiracy theory went viral, the SFPD squashed the lies the very same day.
I dunno man.
GreenWave
(6,723 posts)Here is how they solve the "mystery" if they know each other.
-Hello Nancy! ...did they by chance know each other?
No!
Disaffected
(4,554 posts)are what prosecutors need to establish b/f proceeding with criminal charges (Law 101).
2). So, now we have moved to "apparent" motive?
3). Because that's the way they roll the ratings??
BTW, he wasn't in "brain surgery" either.
Just A Box Of Rain
(5,104 posts)Atticus
(15,124 posts)5 hours. It is not difficult to imagine that surgery to repair a fractured skull would involve the brain. Should they have said it was "skull surgery"?
I am not aware that any prosecutor is required to prove motive. They may want to because it may make their case stronger, but they are not "required" to prove motive.
Disaffected
(4,554 posts)Brain surgery involves opening the lining around the brain (the meninges) followed by performing a procedure on the brain tissue itself (usually to remove destroyed tissue and/or stop hemorrhaging in cases of severe head trauma). AFAIK, this didn't happen and it was in fact more accurately described as fractured skull surgery.
Prosecutors aren't "required" i.e. compelled to prove anything in particular but, if they wish to win the case, having evidence of motive is highly beneficial in reaching a just verdict.
Atticus
(15,124 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)Possibly have been Depape's Motive when he shouted out .. "Where's Nancy" with a Hammer and Duct Tape and Zip ties in his bag?!!
Does J6 ring any Bells when the Domestic Terrorists Stormed the Capitol Building Looking for Speaker Nancy Pelosi so they could kill her?
GoCubsGo
(32,080 posts)They didn't play the "both sides do it" game, but they only danced along the line of pointing out who actually does it, without saying so. Progress, I guess. They did somewhat insinuate the motive, I'll give them that. Hopefully, they'll grow a spine, and come out and say it.
Cha
(297,154 posts)I don't have a tv and came up with it being the same only instead of a Mob incited by DT.. it was one Idiot incited by DT & the previous Terrorism at the Capitol Building.
Both of them were Stopped by Quck thinking people.. Nancy for one.. and Paul Pelosi!
spooky3
(34,439 posts)People can draw their own conclusions.
https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/2022/10/jon-stewart-grills-arizona-attorney-general-who-cant-let-go-of-trumps-fake-election-conspiracy/amp
Im not a lawyer but psychologists have studied motives extensively. And many would say we can often infer motives from peoples behavior. In this case certainly the behavior suggests strongly that at least one motive was what OP suggested.
Cha
(297,154 posts)think?
Please see my post #22..
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1002&pid=17302285
spooky3
(34,439 posts)Cha
(297,154 posts)malaise
(268,949 posts)spooky3
(34,439 posts)Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)You weren't kidding.
Maga carrying zip ties and a hammer breaks in, screams for Nancy then brains her husband with the hammer.
But we shouldn't jump to conclusions about the motive??
That is the most bat-shit thing I've seen in a bat-shit week of bat-shittery.
spooky3
(34,439 posts)Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)Walleye
(31,011 posts)GreenWave
(6,723 posts)The outside world is black and white with only one color dead.
viva la
(3,286 posts)to speculate that there's a slight chance that this was actually Mr. Pelosi's fault-- that he invited the man to come hit him with a hammer or something.
"Why was he in his underwear??"
Oh, maybe it was because it was 2 am and he had been sleeping?
TexasBushwhacker
(20,174 posts)What is Musk's thing with gay men. Remember when he said the man in Thailand that helped save the boys trapped in a cave was a "pedo guy"? WTF! Most people's minds don't "go there". It's odd. He says he has Asperger's though.
Mopar151
(9,980 posts)Being wired to industrial standards, is a poor excuse for being a wood chipper of a person.
sarcasmo
(23,968 posts)Jack the Greater
(601 posts)That has to be good for a few episodes of Fox and Friends.
egduj
(805 posts)There is absolutely no justification for what happened.
NewHendoLib
(60,014 posts)Hekate
(90,645 posts)
make the front page. Kevin McCarthy has a big spread today called McCarthys Trumpian bargain. It does not look flattering. When the assassination attempt on the Speaker almost mortally wounded her husband instead, it was all over several pages in 2 sections.
I keep recommending the Los Angeles Times to people they have pretty good national coverage and a slew of excellent columnists.
I dont need the continual aggravation from the TV-machine or the Intertubes.
OMGWTF
(3,951 posts)They have/had subscription special for $1 a week.
Boomerproud
(7,952 posts)Upthevibe
(8,038 posts)Captain Zero
(6,805 posts)Also, any chance the defense could mount an insanity defense based on he was doing what Donald Trump told him to do?
Lunabell
(6,078 posts)Corporate hacks.
malaise
(268,949 posts)Rec
Response to Atticus (Original post)
malaise This message was self-deleted by its author.
pansypoo53219
(20,973 posts)spooky3
(34,439 posts)BigmanPigman
(51,584 posts)Link to tweet
?s=20&t=Osm4OTIi4QVsTuTxuABZBw
Evolve Dammit
(16,723 posts)COL Mustard
(5,897 posts)She'd have had protection. The USCP provides it for her but not for her hubs.
I flew across the country next to her several years ago...DCA-SFO. We chatted a little and she seemed very nice. But I wouldn't want to be on the wrong side.
maxsolomon
(33,310 posts)ABC? NBC? MSNBC? CNN? PBS? BBC? CBS?
Who said it? What show?
republianmushroom
(13,581 posts)If David DePape is mentally ill, then that means that every Magat is mentally ill. They all believe the same unbelievable bullshit.
Kid Berwyn
(14,881 posts)The country is in seriously crooked cross stuff and needs to be straightened the hell out.
DFW
(54,358 posts)They are the tactics of all extremists, especially ones who manage to gain power. They get sadists with managerial skills to hire other sadists who love having official sanction for their perversions.
DemocraticPatriot
(4,345 posts)However, there are far too many elected Republicans who are fomenting hate and even advocating violence against Democrats to presume that it was only the fault of TFG.... they can all share the responsibility.
dalton99a
(81,455 posts)soldierant
(6,847 posts)"the streets know" what happened, you and I being "The Streets" and having two eyes and two brain cells to rub together.
I's a phrase used by Glenn Kirschner recently, though not original to him. The point was that "What the streets know" is not the same as court evidence.
And what journalists have to do is somewhere in between.
They should not tell any untruths. They should tell the truth if they can back it up. Like what the police say about the incestigation.
At this point enough has been published to establish
a. He broke in through a window, using a hammer which he brought.
b. He had a bag of Zip ties and sme duct tape.
c. He repeatedly asked where Nancy was and then when she was ecpected home.
d. This is deduction on my part, but it doesn'e appear he had attacked Paul when the police came in. They came in and saw them struggling for the hammer, they yelled at both to drop it, and THEN DePape hit Pelosi on the head with the hammer - the police saw him do it. It's not clear when his arm and hand were hit. Based on the description of the arm-hand injuries, he could not have struggled very effectively with that arm after being hit. However, he has two.
It's possible - far from certain, but possible - that he intended only to tie Paul up, since he was looking for Nancy. But when the police arrived, he decided Paul had somehow called them, and that pissed him off, so he attacked Paul.
I do think it's clear he was looking for Nancy.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,328 posts)Fridays brutal attack on House Speaker Nancy Pelosis husband, Paul Pelosi, at their San Francisco home was overtly political and a logical endpoint to the decades of deeply personal villainization House Speaker Nancy Pelosi has weathered from her political opponents.
Its now clear the speaker was the target of Fridays attack. The assailant broke into the home looking for her, reportedly shouting, Where is Nancy? echoing the chant insurrectionists called out when they breached the US Capitol on January 6 and saying that he would wait until Nancy got home as he tried to tie up Paul Pelosi. The speakers husband suffered a skull fracture and serious injuries to his right arm and hands that required surgery after the assailant bludgeoned him with a hammer. (A spokesperson for the speaker said in a statement that Paul Pelosi is expected to make a full recovery.)
Even before Pelosi became speaker, Republicans in the party and those adjacent to it have demonized her regularly, featuring her in attack ads and lambasting her on Fox News. At least one of her colleagues in the House, Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-GA), has directly indicated support for violence against her. And members of right wing militia groups such as the Oath Keepers and the Three Percenters have sought her assassination.
[ Links in the original have been omitted here ]
msfiddlestix
(7,278 posts)Or in the presence of the police?
After they arrive, the attacker explains the reasons why he is there, and then attacks Pelosi?
and when police arrived, the attacker told them they were "waiting for Nancy" and then savagely struck Mr. Pelosi numerous times with the hammer, fracturing his skull and doing "serious injury" to his right hand and arm.
Scrivener7
(50,949 posts)msfiddlestix
(7,278 posts)If true, I can easily see it as we have seen things happen so quickly, unable to prevent them from occurring.
Heather MC
(8,084 posts)And actually what's going to be murder of the human being..
Also please don't correct my spelling I called her that for a reason.
sop
(10,162 posts)insurrectionists did during their own trials, these fair and balanced journalists will report the real motive.
underpants
(182,774 posts)Paul looks like hes pretty tall and not frail by any means but still. This 42 year old was actually having a hard time with an 82 year old guy?
JustAnotherGen
(31,812 posts)Attempt.
Response to Atticus (Original post)
Post removed