General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLearning from Gandhi's mistakes
Mahatma Gandhi is often praised as the man who defeated British imperialism with non-violent agitation. It is still a delicate and unfashionable thing to discuss his mistakes and failures, a criticism hitherto mostly confined to Communist and Hindutva publications. But at this distance in time, we shouldn't be inhibited by a taboo on criticizing official India's patron saint.
read more..
http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/articles/fascism/gandhimistake.html
orpupilofnature57
(15,472 posts)Dr Koenraad EIst seems like a smart guy, but he didn't graduate Oxford at 17 and Gandhi didn't have an axe to grind with anyone ,just Peace and Equality. http://koenraadelst.bharatvani.org/ http://www.mkgandhi.org/
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)too bad his ideals weren't good enough for Koenraad Elst.
greytdemocrat
(3,299 posts)obliviously
(1,635 posts)Why don't they try to achieve more themselves rather than drag someone down to their level.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Interesting article but true believers will never acknowledge their particular saint has some troubled history.
Thanks for posting this.
cheapdate
(3,811 posts)That's not how I would put it at all. Koenraad calls them "political failures". He characterizes Gandhi's participation in mobilizing soldiers to fight alongside the Allies in WW1, without later "extract(ing) any tangible gains for India" as a "glaring failure of political skill". He criticizes Gandhi for "the mistake of hubris" for believing he could make peace with Ottoman Muslims. From the perspective of perfect hindsight, he criticizes Gandhi's "judgment" for negotiating in good faith with British Viceroy Lord Irwin.
I'm perfectly capable of looking at Gandhi's actions in a factual and unromantic way. Koenraad's tone and attitude are simply petty and shitty, in my opinion.