General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsElizabeth Warren SHOULD NOT be on the Senate Banking Committee
Today we read that Professor Warren, despite her alleged status as one of the nation's top banking experts, may not be appointed to the Senate Banking Committee.
Thank goodness!
Professor Warren is a well-known agitator who only expertise is on the subject of how banks destroy economies and lives. She knows nothing of the manly business of making money. Sure, banks destroy economies and lives - but that's not their purpose. Their purpose is to make money, and any destruction that they leave in their wake is merely a necessary part of making a living. A really, really good living. Really enormous, bigger than you can possibly imagine. Huge. Ginormous.
And that's what government's here for, isn't it? So that bankers can make even more money, so eventually they'll make enough to create a job.
We need sensible Democrats on the Banking Committee, folks who know how the world really works. Not Krugman-firebagger types like Professor Warren. As Occupy-crushing NYC Mayor Bloomberg said, if Warren gets a lick of power, she'll "close the banks and get rid of corporate profits, and wed all bring socialism back, or the U.S.S.R..
Well, we don't want the U.S.S. of R. here in the US, no sir. We'll keep our precious bodily fluids to ourselves.
I hope you'll join me in putting pressure on our elected representatives to keep Professor Warren away from anything important. Our precious bodily fluids are just too precious to put at risk.
Sincerely,
Third-Way Manny
pa28
(6,145 posts)Telling. Not arguing or suggesting.
dragonlady
(3,577 posts)L0oniX
(31,493 posts)AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)joshcryer
(62,266 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)Good luck!
joshcryer
(62,266 posts)MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)you'd care to post my entire post, for context.
Regards,
First-Way Manny
argiel1234
(390 posts)are your confused
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)RomneyLies
(3,333 posts)You didn't even need the sarcasm thingie to make your point.
Well done, sir.
Bravo!
ProudProgressiveNow
(6,129 posts)Bonobo
(29,257 posts)Were you ever banned from Kos?
JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)Edit: OK I see some posters are saying its sarcasm. Still new around here. Funny stuff.
joshcryer
(62,266 posts)This is the second thread, by the usual suspects, on this matter today. They thrive on that shit.
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)the anti-Democrat crowd now has free reign once again.
Sid
joshcryer
(62,266 posts)Otherwise they're more a nuisance than anything (since the apparent false flag efforts to make Obama lose didn't work).
I mean, look at Warren. A while ago Obama was being thrown under the bus for "firing" her (when she had long stated that she didn't want the position permanently, and furthermore when those in her inner circle said she was moving on to greener pastures; the Senate).
Anyone could've done substantiative political analysis at the time (which I did do) and find that Warren was wanting to go on to the Senate (and may even have aspirations for the White House). But, nah, it had to be hyperbole, and bickering, pathetic bullshit. From the same people who credited the Republicans for ending DADT (really), to saying Bush got us out of Iraq (really), to saying Obama should be impeached (really!), to saying the end of ACA = single payer (really!!!). All the while adopting quotes from right wing sources (you Better Believe It) and driving the right wing narrative right down our throats.
It's a joke.
one_voice
(20,043 posts)JaneyVee
(19,877 posts)progressives to bash Obama from the Left in order to disenfranchise voters and score a RW victory? Anything is plausible, I've been subjected to similar scenarios in my activist life, some of it, at best, tore apart groups of friends, taking sides, at worst dismantling months/years of grassroots coalitions. I don't know the dynamics of this forum to even speculate, but many people have many different versions of utopia.
joshcryer
(62,266 posts)I don't trust one iota people who side with the right wing on issues like that. Driving the right wing narrative is exactly what the right wing wants. In fact, I would argue that if they drive it home enough, then the people become complacent and won't fight back against certain right wing policy changes. A case in point was how the teabaggers got out 9% more votes than the liberals in 2010. Talk down enough and people just become disillusioned.
I hope to hell and back Warren gets the gig on the banking committee just so I can show the blatant hypocrisy when she is thrown under the bus for potentially compromising or whatever. She won't even have to compromise, all that has to happens is that there are rumors of a compromise. Then pow, under the bus.
Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)nt
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)The Manufactured Outrage Machine was broken for a while. But it looks like its sputtered back into operation.
But its widget count has slipped considerably.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)The small but vocal contingent of people before profits Democrats are the most common players.
Autumn
(44,981 posts)cause no one cuts to the heart of third wayism better than Manny.
BouzoukiKing
(163 posts)...K & R for the Dr. Strangelove reference.
idwiyo
(5,113 posts)randome
(34,845 posts)Banks, like any corporations, only care about the bottom line. To paint them all as conspirators in some kind of destructive plot is ridiculous.
Banks also help people buy houses and start businesses, you know.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)Now that I've had my blinders lifted, I really don't even know what the hell those fools in Massachusetts thought they were doing, voting for this agitator.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)and a sacrifice we'll have to make.
bvar22
(39,909 posts)We need to keep Fringe Leftists like Warren completely away from ANY positions of power.
We need "moderates" who can compromise with Republicans to make all the decisions.
After All, Republicans still have a slim majority in The House, so they are in the Power Seat and we must respect that.
Like the last four years, there is really nothing else we can do except give them everything they want.
THAT is the only Sensible, Pragmatic approach.
woo me with science
(32,139 posts)What a day for articles on possible picks!
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021786390
It's a veritable Third Way EXTRAVAGANZA of possibilities!
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)We can only hope it's true; Lord knows we need to kneecap the Unionistas who want a "living wage".
Sincerely,
Third-Way Manny
Fuddnik
(8,846 posts)Just to keep an eye on her!
what you talking bout Willis? give it to Karl Rove he knows how to spend money.
progressoid
(49,947 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Bucky
(53,947 posts)gravity
(4,157 posts)I consider myself a Third Way Democrat and think that Elizabeth Warren should be perfect on the Senate Banking Committee.
Agony
(2,605 posts)Shining Jack
(1,559 posts)JI7
(89,240 posts)The chances are good, but not guaranteed, that Elizabeth Warren will secure a highly coveted seat on the Senate Banking Committee, a move that would dramatically elevate her campaign against Wall Street excess.
Senior Senate Democratic aides, speaking on condition of anonymity, said the Massachusetts senator-elect is a logical fit for the committee, even though it is rare for a freshman senator to get such a plum assignment.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid likely won't start considering committee assignments until the new year. Still, one Senate Democratic aide predicted that if Warren wants to be on the banking panel, the odds are good she'll get it.
"The leadership and committee chairmen usually work together to try to accommodate incoming senators' preferences, within reason," the aide told Reuters.
"If Senator-elect Warren indicates she'd like to serve on the banking committee, given her prominent work on those issues, she would certainly have a very good shot."
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/11/09/us-usa-senate-warren-banking-idUSBRE8A804R20121109
SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
Liberal_Dog
(11,075 posts)SidDithers
(44,228 posts)Sid
joshcryer
(62,266 posts)I'll be so amused as she's thrown under the bus here for not nationalizing the banks and turning the US into the USSR.
Autumn
(44,981 posts)she would annoy the shit out of those horses asses on the committee.
amborin
(16,631 posts)The Center for Responsive Politics notes that committee members, on both sides of the aisle, have benefitted from donations by Dimon personally and by bank's PACs. Dimon has personally contributed to committee members Bob Corker (R-TN) and Mark Warner (D-VA). Dimon has also contributed to the top Republican Richard Shelby (R-AL) and the top Democrat Chairman Tim Johnson (D-SD).
http://www.propublica.org/article/charting-the-cozy-connections-between-jp-morgan-and-the-senate-banking-comm
One current staffer on the Senate banking committee, Dwight Fettig, is a former lobbyist for JP Morgan [5]. In 2009, the bank hired him to work on financial services regulatory reform. Meanwhile, JP Morgan is stacked thick with former committee staff.
· Naomi Camper Currently a lobbyist for JP Morgan. Prior to that, from 2001-2004, she was an aide [6] to Senator Johnson.
· Kate Childress A JP Morgan lobbyist since 2008 [7], she is also a former aide [8] to Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y., who sits on both the Senate Banking and Finance committees.
· Steven Patterson A JP Morgan lobbyist [9] and formerly a staff director [10] for economic policy for the Banking committee.
· Nate Gatten A JP Morgan lobbyist based in London who was reportedly called back to Washington [11] recently to help with the companys damage control. He is a former lobbyist for Fannie Mae, and, in the 1990s, was a banking aide [12] to former Senator Robert Bennett, R-Utah, who also sat on the committee.
· P. Michael Nielsen A lobbyist with a firm run by former Senator Bennett, he has been retained by JP Morgan [13] for help with federal probes, according to Bloomberg. He was also a senior policy adviser [14] to the committee from 2007 to 2010.
American Banker also reported that three other [15] outside lobbyists currently working for JP Morgan were once affiliated with the committee:
· Jason Rosenberg A lobbyist at The Glover Park Group and formerly an aide [16] to Jon Tester, D-Mont., who sits on the committee.
· Jenn Fogel-Bublick A lobbyist at McBee Strategic Consulting and formerly a Democratic counsel [17] on the committee.
· Mike Chappell A lobbyist for Fierce, Isakowitz & Blalock and a former press assistant [18] to Senator Roger Wicker, R-Miss., another committee member.
A former senator on the committee, Mel Martinez, R-Fl., is also now the JP Morgan exec in charge of Florida, Central America, and the Caribbean. Martinez was elected to the Senate in 2004 [19] and went to the bank in 2010. Bloomberg reported that he was called to Washington [11] after the losses were reported.
Lobbyists for JP Morgan appear to be keeping busy. The bank spent $7.6 million on lobbying last year [20], according to the Center for Responsive Politics.
Oilwellian
(12,647 posts)I'm certain all of these aides slash banking lobbyists are giddy with excitement over the possibility of working with Senator Warner and cracking down on banking corruption!
amborin
(16,631 posts)UnrepentantLiberal
(11,700 posts)Raine
(30,540 posts)Gidney N Cloyd
(19,821 posts)fightthegoodfightnow
(7,042 posts)'Manly Business' of Making Money?
WTF does that mean.....and tell me how have the good old boys been doing making the rules for how men make (or don't make) money?
Maybe it's time to change the rules.
Maybe it's time to change who makes the rules.
Body fluid? Good grief.
Change has come
(2,372 posts)jsmirman
(4,507 posts)I want to believe that would be so dumb and self-defeating that it's not going to happen.
Wall Street was bent over a table and from that commanding position was allowed to dictate terms. And for that they told Obama to piss up a rope.
To bow to them again would be inexplicable.
Response to MannyGoldstein (Original post)
AlbertCat This message was self-deleted by its author.
99Forever
(14,524 posts)OnyxCollie
(9,958 posts)myrna minx
(22,772 posts)AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)argiel1234
(390 posts)Bozita
(26,955 posts)a2liberal
(1,524 posts)It's funny to see all the backlash from the 3rd way-ers on this thread who can't silence everyone with election scares anymore. I suppose saying this makes me a right-wing troll in their eyes though.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)MichaelSoE
(1,576 posts)druidity33
(6,445 posts)With that tongue firmly placed in your cheek?
Hutzpa
(11,461 posts)You had me there until I read that sentence, what the guacamole is that? If you were my son I'll slap the shit out of you if it helps to wake you up from your slumber or drunken stupor, how can you make such egregious argument, a statement such as that tells me you haven't learned a thing.
Basically the only reason why you don't want Warren as head of the banking committee is for the simple fact that she was born a WOMAN, not because she is the best person for the job, but because she is a woman and women cannot do manly jobs. So she needs to step aside and let men continue the demise of the country in these dimly lit rooms fill with cigar smoke and the smell of brandy in the air, how out of touch can you get.
What are the banks afraid of?
With all the blow back from the banks, I won't be surprise to see Harry Reid use some steel by showing the banks whose in charge. Instead of moving the country FORWARD we dress shit up with new clothes and pass it off as change. IMO this will be like throwing down the gauntlet by the Obama administration if they do decide to put her as head of the committee, it will send a message to the corporations of this country that the Obama administration means business.
The base is waiting in the wings to see what the Obama administration is going to do, they will be looking to see if the Obama administration is going to live up to its own expectations that they set during the campaign, are they going to stand by their campaign motto of FORWARD or are they going to let some jerkass blue dog democrat dictate or advocate their agenda.
Bohunk68
(1,364 posts)don't get that this is pure sarcasm without the sarcasm thingee. And, some have 1000's of posts!!! DUHHHHHHHHH
Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)You were too serious leading up to 11/06. Time for us far lefties to start applying pressure to the DINO's
MannyGoldstein
(34,589 posts)so I mostly stayed away from any criticism of Democrats for a while. But now that the time of the Grand Bargaining of Working America has come, it's time for me to restart my pathetic attempts to inform and provoke.
Best,
First-Way Manny
stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I think she should probably get it.
ornotna
(10,795 posts)Leaky fluids.