Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:14 PM Jan 2012

In less than 6 hours, Wikipedia goes dark for a day

To: English Wikipedia Readers and Community
From: Sue Gardner, Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director
Date: January 16, 2012

Today, the Wikipedia community announced its decision to black out the English-language Wikipedia for 24 hours, worldwide, beginning at 05:00 UTC on Wednesday, January 18 (you can read the statement from the Wikimedia Foundation here). The blackout is a protest against proposed legislation in the United States — the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) in the U.S. House of Representatives, and the PROTECT IP Act (PIPA) in the U.S. Senate — that, if passed, would seriously damage the free and open Internet, including Wikipedia.

This will be the first time the English Wikipedia has ever staged a public protest of this nature, and it’s a decision that wasn’t lightly made. Here’s how it’s been described by the three Wikipedia administrators who formally facilitated the community’s discussion. From the public statement, signed by User:NuclearWarfare, User:Risker and User:Billinghurst:
It is the opinion of the English Wikipedia community that both of these bills, if passed, would be devastating to the free and open web.

Over the course of the past 72 hours, over 1800 Wikipedians have joined together to discuss proposed actions that the community might wish to take against SOPA and PIPA. This is by far the largest level of participation in a community discussion ever seen on Wikipedia, which illustrates the level of concern that Wikipedians feel about this proposed legislation. The overwhelming majority of participants support community action to encourage greater public action in response to these two bills. Of the proposals considered by Wikipedians, those that would result in a “blackout” of the English Wikipedia, in concert with similar blackouts on other websites opposed to SOPA and PIPA, received the strongest support.

On careful review of this discussion, the closing administrators note the broad-based support for action from Wikipedians around the world, not just from within the United States. The primary objection to a global blackout came from those who preferred that the blackout be limited to readers from the United States, with the rest of the world seeing a simple banner notice instead. We also noted that roughly 55% of those supporting a blackout preferred that it be a global one, with many pointing to concerns about similar legislation in other nations.


<more>

http://wikimediafoundation.org/wiki/English_Wikipedia_anti-SOPA_blackout


Wow.
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
In less than 6 hours, Wikipedia goes dark for a day (Original Post) krispos42 Jan 2012 OP
yep. other websites also. what about DU? Liberal_in_LA Jan 2012 #1
I was wondering about that today graywarrior Jan 2012 #2
DU should bigwillq Jan 2012 #5
K and R (nt) bigwillq Jan 2012 #3
Whole lotta folks gonna seem a little dumber tomorrow. (nt) Robb Jan 2012 #4
This is good! Will give me a chance to concentrate on my song writing. Lint Head Jan 2012 #6
A shame it's not for good. MadHound Jan 2012 #7
If not Wiki, then Google would be doing it instead krispos42 Jan 2012 #9
My point exactly! You can also see the sources as well. nt AverageJoe90 Jan 2012 #10
Solamente en ingles KamaAina Jan 2012 #8
I thought you were riffing on "Solamente una vez" EFerrari Jan 2012 #12
I guess I'll have to use Conservapedia for a day ThoughtCriminal Jan 2012 #11
You mean you DON'T think that Jesus slaughtered the pagans while riding a dinosaur-drawn chariot? krispos42 Jan 2012 #15
Yeah, we've got to fight back! Cal33 Jan 2012 #13
Also archive.org flamingdem Jan 2012 #14
 

bigwillq

(72,790 posts)
5. DU should
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:19 PM
Jan 2012

but I am not sure of their stance on these issues.

They may support it. Not sure.


I believe I will give up Facebook for the day.

Lint Head

(15,064 posts)
6. This is good! Will give me a chance to concentrate on my song writing.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:27 PM
Jan 2012

Or maybe finish reading the Mark Twain biography. Googlers will be lost.

I bet people will complaining to their IP's.

 

MadHound

(34,179 posts)
7. A shame it's not for good.
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:39 PM
Jan 2012

While I appreciate the political protest that the Wiki folks are making, the fact of the matter is that the world would be better off without Wiki. It has directly contributed to intellectual laziness and dishonesty both in schools and out.

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
9. If not Wiki, then Google would be doing it instead
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 07:51 PM
Jan 2012


At least with Wikipedia, you can go back and see all the edits from the article's creation. Try doing that with Google!

krispos42

(49,445 posts)
15. You mean you DON'T think that Jesus slaughtered the pagans while riding a dinosaur-drawn chariot?
Tue Jan 17, 2012, 10:33 PM
Jan 2012

HEATHEN!!!!!

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»In less than 6 hours, Wik...