Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsAfter Hurricane Sandy, The Costs Of Doing Nothing To Protect New York Come Into Focus
from HuffPost:
NEW YORK -- For years, the city and the state of New York commissioned reports about the dangers of rising sea levels combined with a powerful hurricane. And for years, dissuaded by the costs of doing something, New York put in place few new preparations for a massive storm surge.
Now we have the first glimpse of the costs of doing nothing: at least 97 deaths in and around New York City, and $33 billion in damage from Hurricane Sandy in New York State alone, according to Gov. Andrew Cuomo.
Next time the damage done in dollars and in lives could be far worse. At its peak, Sandy was only a Category 1 storm. Its winds never went above 90 miles per hour near New York. Were something like a Category 4 storm, with winds of 131 to 155 miles per hour, to make landfall near the city, the devastation would be awful.
Many more would die. Houses would be toppled over by sheer windforce, subway tunnels could be flooded for months instead of a week, and the economic capital of the United States could be paralyzed. The city would incur $500 billion worth of damage, according to a 2006 analysis by the Department of Homeland Security. ...............(more)
The complete piece is at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/21/hurricane-sandy-new-york_n_2171199.html
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 869 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
After Hurricane Sandy, The Costs Of Doing Nothing To Protect New York Come Into Focus (Original Post)
marmar
Nov 2012
OP
no_hypocrisy
(46,026 posts)1. Lower Manhattan was under water.
The waters receded this time.
What if they don't next time? Is New York City ready to give up its real estate? Wall Street?
FarCenter
(19,429 posts)3. Manhattan is probably pretty easy to protect
The World Trade Center, for example, sits in a huge reinforced concrete bathtub that extends far below the water level of the Hudson River. It would seem possible to extend this structure upwards another 20 to 40 feet in order to keep out flood waters.
The same approach could be taken to protect the lower couple of floors of other buildings in the lower lying areas of Manhattan.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Bathtub
dkf
(37,305 posts)2. Can we do much to protect from a level 3 or 4 storm?
I can see barriers for storm surges, but I wonder what is the possibility of building houses that can withstand that.