General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUS Civil War question.....
How did the landed, wealthy slave-owning class in the South get poor subsistence farmers and the working class to fight their war for slavery?
cthulu2016
(10,960 posts)Regionalism. Nationalism.
It trumps class interest.
MNBrewer
(8,462 posts)and religion.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)newspapers of the time. The rest is propaganda - keep big gov't from our doors.
Ron Green
(9,822 posts)YellowRubberDuckie
(19,736 posts)MadHound
(34,179 posts)Namely spreading the myth that the war was not about slavery, but rather about "states' rights", a lie that persists, and is sadly effective, to this day.
unblock
(52,116 posts)they spent enough of their money on p.r. and media control to convince the masses that they were the good guys, they were looking out for the interests of their fellow countrymen, they were providing the jobs and good and services and so on.
they also spent enough of their money on anti-northern p.r. to convince the masses that the northerners were out to abolish the southern "way of life", that northerners were out to conquer and control them, take their resources, tell them how to live, etc.
throw in the usual romance about fighting for honor and for their beloved state and you've got an army eager to die for you.
keep in mind also that most soldiers were very young and impressionable. i mean, we may think today's recruits are young if they enlist straight out of high school, but that's old man status by historical standards.
Selatius
(20,441 posts)They already controlled the legislative process. It was a simple matter to author, vote upon, and pass into law a bill mandating a military draft.
To encourage support, of course they are going to play up identity politics and divide the people by promoting regional nationalism over the interests of the entire federation, but this aspect was one that took years. It takes an extended period of time to condition a population to largely accept certain propaganda.
By adopting this two-pronged approach, they ensured that there would be a fair amount of support both for secession and for a draft whenever one was declared.
The assets these wealthy landowners were protecting were the slaves, probably worth several hundred billion in today's dollars. They did not like the idea of the federal government taking that kind of wealth away and freeing what they felt was valuable "property."
brewens
(13,538 posts)that class barrier was critical. Kind of like middle class and upper middle class people are kept in line now. Make them believe that helping poor people is at their expense. They don't realize the people at the top are screwing everyone.
demosincebirth
(12,529 posts)an institution
Bruce Wayne
(692 posts)They were all held hostage to the slave system--rich and poor. And so they loved it even more, despite the economic inefficiency of slave-labor was one of the main things keeping the south in debt to northern bankers.
Did you know cotton made up 80% of US exports in the 1850s? And yet the cotton growers were not reaping the rewards. For reasons of supply and demand, the few Yankee bankers and shippers who dealt with the cotton trade were able to suck up all the profits. That sort of issue wouldn't divide the large planters from the poor cotton farmers--it would give them common cause. When the shooting started against the north, they were all willing to jump aboard the Bitter Express.
Major Nikon
(36,818 posts)It's basically the same spew the GOP uses on the ignorant rubes today. They convince them that being poor and ignorant are good things because change is bad, and that the rich people really are the only ones that have their best interests in mind.
AnOhioan
(2,894 posts)and every war thereafter.
Dan
(3,537 posts)girls like a guy in uniform,
adventure,
fun,
....no body thinks that they are going to die...