General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBill Kristol prefers Susan Rice over John Kerry because he thinks Rice is more interventionist.
Be careful what you wish for. You just may be supporting more military involvement.
Note that Lieberman sounds positive towards her also.
liberal N proud
(60,334 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)Please, see, http://www.democraticunderground.com/10021890629
After all, she seems the quickest ticket to another "humanitarian intervention" in Syria, and then war with Iran. Just what the neocons called for, and with limited opposition from the easily divided and confused Left. Just what the chef ordered.
dkf
(37,305 posts)Thanks.
Democrats need to think beyond Benghazi and circling the wagons and realize what Susan Rice would mean for foreign policy. How ironic would it be if we find ourselves in Neocon land with a Democratic President?
leveymg
(36,418 posts)Maybe not so accidental.
My impression of Rice, gained from reading about her, is that she's seen as being the WH advisor most closely aligned with Obama's own thinking on foreign policy. If that's true, we are in for one Hell of a Second Term.
ProSense
(116,464 posts)Patently absurd.
The RW is trying to mess with people's heads, and evidently it's working. The ridiculous theories being floated are pathetic.
karynnj
(59,500 posts)You know they are more intent on creating chaos when they do things like this.
dkf
(37,305 posts)leveymg
(36,418 posts)such as her old protege at Brookings, Robert Kagan. Please, see, http://www.blogforarizona.com/blog/2012/11/sen-john-mccain-should-listen-to-his-fellow-neocon-robert-kagan-stop-scapegoating-susan-rice.html and read the links.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)I would rather see Kerry than Rice.
Enrique
(27,461 posts)Is she really more interventionist than Kerry? The only person I've ever heard that from is from Bill Krsitol, who is not reliable as a sole source of information.