Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTransfer pricing is one of the most important issues in international tax
Transfer pricing happens whenever two related companies that is, a parent company and a subsidiary, or two subsidiaries controlled by a common parent trade with each other. This happens when, for instance, a US-based subidiary of Coca-Cola buys something from a French-based subsidiary of Coca-Cola. When the parties establish a price for the transaction, they are engaging in transfer pricing.
Transfer pricing is not, in itself, illegal or abusive. What is illegal or abusive is transfer mispricing, also known as transfer pricing manipulation or abusive transfer pricing. (Transfer mispricing is a form of a more general phenomenon known as trade mispricing, which includes trade between unrelated or apparently unrelated parties - an example is reinvoicing.)
It is estimated that about 60 percent of international trade happens within, rather than between, multinationals: that is, across national boundaries but within the same corporate group. Suggestions have been made that this figure may be closer to 70 percent.
Estimates vary as to how much tax revenue is lost by governments due to transfer mispricing. Global Financial Integrity in Washington estimates the amount at several hundred billion dollars annually. A March 2009 Christian Aid report estimated $1.1 trillion in bilateral trade mispricing into the EU and the US alone from non-EU countries from 2005 to 2007. The Magnitudes section of our website contains a range of estimates and data.
http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/front_content.php?idcat=139
Transfer pricing is not, in itself, illegal or abusive. What is illegal or abusive is transfer mispricing, also known as transfer pricing manipulation or abusive transfer pricing. (Transfer mispricing is a form of a more general phenomenon known as trade mispricing, which includes trade between unrelated or apparently unrelated parties - an example is reinvoicing.)
It is estimated that about 60 percent of international trade happens within, rather than between, multinationals: that is, across national boundaries but within the same corporate group. Suggestions have been made that this figure may be closer to 70 percent.
Estimates vary as to how much tax revenue is lost by governments due to transfer mispricing. Global Financial Integrity in Washington estimates the amount at several hundred billion dollars annually. A March 2009 Christian Aid report estimated $1.1 trillion in bilateral trade mispricing into the EU and the US alone from non-EU countries from 2005 to 2007. The Magnitudes section of our website contains a range of estimates and data.
http://www.taxjustice.net/cms/front_content.php?idcat=139
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
5 replies, 1341 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (3)
ReplyReply to this post
5 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Transfer pricing is one of the most important issues in international tax (Original Post)
FreakinDJ
Jan 2012
OP
liberaltalkingpoints
(23 posts)1. good to know but
we need many more liberals in congress who are willing to take on the multinationals in these schemes.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)2. Thank you. I for one know little about the business world and appreciate any help.
PETRUS
(3,678 posts)3. Love knowing these kind of details.
Nice post!
joeglow3
(6,228 posts)4. Not a shock at all. What would you prefer? All activity overseas?
I work in the tax department of a Fortune 500 multinational. Over 90% of our production is done in the US. We produce our products in the US, but sell a lot in Canada and Mexico. We want a sales force and other activities done there and it makes sense to have separate legal entities in each country.
However, as a large company, we update our transfer pricing studies every 3 years and they are HEAVILY scritinized by all parties (IRS and all foreign governments).
FreakinDJ
(17,644 posts)5. The US should not be Taxing Foreign Profits at all IMO
nor giving Foreign Tax Credits