Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Botany

(70,490 posts)
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:25 AM Jan 2012

5 Questions about the Keystone Pipeline

Ask yourselves a few questions:

1.Why not refine the tar sands of Canada in Canada and distribute by truck , IF the intent is to provide oil to The United States?

2.Why must the refinery be in Houston?

3. Could it be because it easier to ship oil overseas from Houston?

4.Don’t Canadians need construction and refinery jobs?

5. Why is Canada so eager to provide the US with such an opportunity ?

http://worthingtonforobama2012.wordpress.com/2012/01/22/xl-pipeline/

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
5 Questions about the Keystone Pipeline (Original Post) Botany Jan 2012 OP
Short answers. TheWraith Jan 2012 #1

TheWraith

(24,331 posts)
1. Short answers.
Sun Jan 22, 2012, 11:47 AM
Jan 2012

The reasons for 1 and 2 are the same: refineries are huge, expensive, and difficult to build, taking a long time and often a lot of wrangling. Case in point, even in the rather oil-friendly environment in the US, there hasn't been a single refinery built within at least the last 20 years, maybe more. Houston is where the US refineries are, refineries which already have enough excess capacity to handle oil being imported, refined, then returned elsewhere. This is doubly true when you already have people in Canada raising hell about the ecological impact of tapping the tar sands in the first place, let alone then building a refinery there to further crack the hydrocarbons.

3. Possibly, but the fact is that the "It's all going overseas!" mantra is greatly overstated. Selling oil on a world market, it's not really that cost effective to take oil out of the US and ship it halfway around the world where they're going to be paying basically the same price. The net result is that some would end up going overseas, some would be used in the US.

4. Building a pipeline isn't really a lot of construction jobs. It's basically just a massive underground pipe. You get a short burst of construction work, then very little afterward. The real windfall to Canada is number 5, for which the answer is "Because they want to sell the tar sands oil and make money off of it." That's where the cash is from the Canadian perspective, and it's why now they're talking about trekking it to BC and shipping it to China (as I pointed out at the time of the Keystone discussions).

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»5 Questions about the Key...