General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWould this work? Another treat guns like cars argument.
Last edited Sat Dec 22, 2012, 03:29 AM - Edit history (1)
I support all gun bans, and stricter regulations and laws. In addition to banning assault rifles, and high velocity and frangible bullets, large clips, and all drums, I'd like to see registered guns be checked for rate of fire periodically, like all of us have to do when the DMV sends us a notice to have our car's emissions tested. If a gun's rate of fire doesn't pass spec, the gun must be permanently modified or turned in. Guns with smaller clips and lower rates of fire would be a big improvement.
What do y'all think?
CTyankee
(63,901 posts)why public safety is patriotic in its highest, most developed form...
Earth_First
(14,910 posts)So one who is hypothetically a sport shooter and fires his/her weapons more frequently is, what exactly?
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)NashvilleLefty
(811 posts)That being said, I think your suggestions have some merits.
As you said, "Guns with smaller clips and lower rates of fire would be a big improvement. " I'm all for that, whatever it takes to achieve it.
Riftaxe
(2,693 posts)Then stand around puzzled while no one follows the law....brilliant!
Agnosticsherbet
(11,619 posts)Rape is against the law. Does rape = marijuana?
The argument that people will ignore the law and break it has no merit. That is what criminals do.
WhaTHellsgoingonhere
(5,252 posts)Are dey comin' to get y'r gurns?