I will not watch a minute of that show when he's on it.

I'll watch CNN, or something on the DVR.

When Joe Scab is away, I might watch, but that depends on who's hosting and who they plan to have on.

But I will never watch while he's on. If I wanted to listen to an endless stream of right wing talking points, I'd watch Fox News, they do a much better job that the dimwit Scarborough.

I also usually turn away from MSNBC when Andrea Mitchell is on. Her ham handed approach to repeating right wing talking points causes my hand to change the channel all by itself.

FinsUpTechGuy

(16 posts)

4. eh

Reply to spanone (Original post)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 11:10 AM

Jan 2012

I don't want MSNBC to be our Fox. I think overall they have found people that at least can knock the GOP candidates once in a while, not saying I don't want to throw things when they talk sometimes.......but we are not Fox and we can listen to others. Then we can tell them why they are wrong. Schmidt has been a good addition to the election night coverage as someone who at least can break down the game of politics.

BlueCaliDem

(15,438 posts)

5. I agree. I really do like Steele, Schmidt, and Joe

Reply to FinsUpTechGuy (Reply #4)

Mon Jan 23, 2012, 11:24 AM

Jan 2012

on MSNBC because they bring their own, reasoned opinions and insights without their former bloviating, and there's a sane, sound discussion.

Also, it's nice to see MSNBC give a former Republican congressman a three hour show every morning, a Libertarian (Dylan Ratigan) and hour show, and an Air America liberal like Rachel also her own hour show. They keep the daily line-up very balanced from liberal to conservative and everything in between.

MSNBC actually does what Fox Propaganda Channel claimed but has yet to do.

Reply to this discussion