Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums"By beating them!" Of COURSE, the answer was SO SIMPLE and right under our noses ALL ALONG! USA!
Mitt Romney's Afghanistan Tautology
How do you win? Well, by beating your opponent, of course. And how do you beat your opponent? By winning.
That tautology was essentially former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney's answer when he was asked about how, as commander in chief, he would end the war in Afghanistan without talking to the Taliban.
"By beating them," Romney simply replied to moderator Brian Williams. "By standing behind our troops and making sure we have transitioned to the Afghan military a capacity for them to be successful in holding off the Taliban. Our mission there is to be able to turn Afghanistan and its sovereignty over to a military of Afghan descent, Afghan people that can defend their sovereignty. That's something we can accomplish in the next couple of years."
He criticized President Barack Obama for making it "difficult" for U.S. troops to be successful by: "Number one, announcing a withdrawal date for our troops. Number two, drawing down our surge troops faster than the time the commanders on the ground felt was necessary. You don't draw them down during the middle of the fighting season. And finally, by not overseeing elections in Afghanistan to assure the selection of the president was seen by the people as legitimate."
How do you win? Well, by beating your opponent, of course. And how do you beat your opponent? By winning.
That tautology was essentially former Massachusetts governor Mitt Romney's answer when he was asked about how, as commander in chief, he would end the war in Afghanistan without talking to the Taliban.
"By beating them," Romney simply replied to moderator Brian Williams. "By standing behind our troops and making sure we have transitioned to the Afghan military a capacity for them to be successful in holding off the Taliban. Our mission there is to be able to turn Afghanistan and its sovereignty over to a military of Afghan descent, Afghan people that can defend their sovereignty. That's something we can accomplish in the next couple of years."
He criticized President Barack Obama for making it "difficult" for U.S. troops to be successful by: "Number one, announcing a withdrawal date for our troops. Number two, drawing down our surge troops faster than the time the commanders on the ground felt was necessary. You don't draw them down during the middle of the fighting season. And finally, by not overseeing elections in Afghanistan to assure the selection of the president was seen by the people as legitimate."
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1905 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
"By beating them!" Of COURSE, the answer was SO SIMPLE and right under our noses ALL ALONG! USA! (Original Post)
Amerigo Vespucci
Jan 2012
OP
These GOP candidates are literally debating against an imaginary President, one they have created.
FarLeftFist
Jan 2012
#2
"to assure the SELECTION of the president was seen by the people as legitimate"
Amonester
Jan 2012
#5
notadmblnd
(23,720 posts)1. Fighting season. Is that like hunting season?
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)8. Wabbit Season!
Duck Season!
Wabbit Season!
FarLeftFist
(6,161 posts)2. These GOP candidates are literally debating against an imaginary President, one they have created.
I can't wait for these talking points to get vaporized when they actually have to debate Obama on this BS.
SomethingFishy
(4,876 posts)3. Now there is a guy who has studied the history of Afghanistan...
Michael Hastings has reported that some Afghani's think they are still fighting the Soviets. Maybe Romney plans on explaining it to them.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)4. Romney can't clear the Commander-In-Chief hurdle
In 2007 he said that catching Bin Laden wasn't worth the effort and back when he was 19 he protested in favor of the Vietnam era draft while exempt from the draft.
There is no freaking way he can stand up to Pres. Obama on this. This can come out sooner or it can come out later, it won't make any difference. He just can't clear that hurdle.
Amonester
(11,541 posts)5. "to assure the SELECTION of the president was seen by the people as legitimate"
ummm... fishy... isn't it?
K8-EEE
(15,667 posts)6. Mitt will make them take out a second mortgage on their caves. n/t
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)7. Romney is obviously interested in poppy growing