Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

RB TexLa

(17,003 posts)
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:23 PM Dec 2012

Why doesn't anyone point out the "fiscal cliff," was the deal we agreed on


This didn't just happen, it was the result of a couple of "deals." I don't see why we couldn't uphold our words in that deal. It's not like it wasn't known to be coming at midnight tonight. People had plenty of time to prepare for it.

And compared to what has been agreed to with the senate and the president it does a lot more to reduce the deficit. A whole lot more. The deal just struck is a joke compared to it. A joke. It shows the world that we can nothing about the future, nothing at all.

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

unblock

(52,126 posts)
1. it was designed to be a deal neither side wanted to happen.
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:25 PM
Dec 2012

it was their twisted way of setting a deadline to get some sort of deal done.

unblock

(52,126 posts)
6. actually, it was a deal that shows we nearly replayed the mistakes of 1937.
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:34 PM
Dec 2012

in and of itself, i don't object to the tax side of the fiscal cliff, and i don't in principle object to hefty spending cuts coming mostly from defense. but i do object to the spending cuts on the non-defense discretionary side and i object to the hammer instead of scalpel approach. finally, i certainly object to the timing, as it's about a year too soon to seriously reduce the deficit.

personally, i think the best achievable deal would have been to DELAY pretty much the entire fiscal cliff for one year, at which point it would have not been too ridiculous to just let it happen. or better yet, democrats could drive a very favorable bargain.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
8. you - you - you historian!
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:51 PM
Dec 2012

Historians are as bad as liberals!
History has a liberal bias!
Oh wait, I meant science has a liberal bias!
Oh wait, science is based on historical analysis!
Oh wait, historical analysis is based on science!

 

TheProgressive

(1,656 posts)
3. We have a 'representative' democracy and 'we' said $250k
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:32 PM
Dec 2012

Our government isn't suppose to make 'deals' - it is supposed to carry out the will of the people.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
4. "We"??? Speak for yourself.
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:33 PM
Dec 2012

Obama just made history - as a moderate conservative running against a right-wing nut,
Obama won slightly more than half the vote.
wtf? that's supposed to be good news? ???

 

plethoro

(594 posts)
7. There is no good news in this deal. The difference in the tax cut puts
Mon Dec 31, 2012, 11:43 PM
Dec 2012

social programs on the table in six weeks, ready for another cave. And the putting off defense cuts for a "short" period is a huge loss.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Why doesn't anyone point ...