Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Adsos Letter

(19,459 posts)
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 01:37 PM Jan 2013

Blood of Louis XVI 'found in gourd container'

Source:
BBC
1 January 2013
LINK: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-20882305


The monarch was killed by guillotine by French revolutionaries more than 200 years ago, on 21 January 1793.

...

After Louis XVI's beheading many spectators were reported to have dipped their handkerchiefs in his blood.

The piece of fabric had been placed in a dried, hollowed-out gourd, leaving blood stains.

The squash was decorated with images of revolutionary heroes and the words: "On January 21, Maximilien Bourdaloue dipped his handkerchief in the blood of Louis XVI after his decapitation".


Gruesome piece of history to own.
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Blood of Louis XVI 'found in gourd container' (Original Post) Adsos Letter Jan 2013 OP
Ewwww frazzled Jan 2013 #1
DNA is not meaningless. aquart Jan 2013 #4
Looking for the genes of Jesus? HereSince1628 Jan 2013 #5
No. Unless you have a line of descendants we could match it to? aquart Jan 2013 #7
I thought the baseline markers were from Master Masons and 1st century graves HereSince1628 Jan 2013 #9
Master masons? aquart Jan 2013 #10
I'm talking about "relics" being meaningless. frazzled Jan 2013 #6
What we think we know and what we can confirm, not the same. aquart Jan 2013 #8
Cool. progressoid Jan 2013 #2
be interesting to file DNA on that and all old museum specimens of people/animals/plants. Sunlei Jan 2013 #3

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
1. Ewwww
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 01:42 PM
Jan 2013

Thanks for sharing

Actually, that's pretty fascinating. But it's grotesque and rather meaningless in the end, anyway.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
7. No. Unless you have a line of descendants we could match it to?
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 02:09 PM
Jan 2013

Perhaps those French kings? (Okay, now I'm giggling.)

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
9. I thought the baseline markers were from Master Masons and 1st century graves
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 02:18 PM
Jan 2013

near/in Bethlehem and Nazereth.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
6. I'm talking about "relics" being meaningless.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 01:57 PM
Jan 2013

Its only interest is the mildly historical one that people dipped their hankies in his blood. That kind of bloodlust during the Terror was interesting (severed heads of princesses marched around on top of pikes in the streets and all), but we kind of knew about that.

aquart

(69,014 posts)
8. What we think we know and what we can confirm, not the same.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 02:12 PM
Jan 2013

And considering how many bones saints had during the Middle Ages, I do wonder if that blood is Bourbon or just beer.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
3. be interesting to file DNA on that and all old museum specimens of people/animals/plants.
Tue Jan 1, 2013, 01:45 PM
Jan 2013

lot of extinct plants and animals rotting in museum drawers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Blood of Louis XVI 'found...