General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe media must be tired of the GOP. Now they're on about the Democrats coming civil war
Just as Republicans were so divided over taxes from failing to pass their own Plan B bill last week, to their leaders splitting votes on last nights legislative package Democrats are about to endure an emotional debate about one of their own bedrock principles: the protection of programs like Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.
The biggest reform Republicans have vowed to push for in these upcoming standoffs is so-called entitlement reform, a.k.a. deficit reduction, a.k.a., cutting social insurance and benefits for those in need.The problem for Democrats: No one in the party agrees on how to address the issue.But coming on the heels of a campaign that explicitly litigated the twin issues of tax fairness and protecting benefits for those in need, Obama finds himself with a growing, emboldened liberal wing of his party. And its as dead set against balancing the deficit on the backs of the neediest Americans, as House conservatives are to raising taxes.
This sets up, of course, Democrats own version of intra-party chaos, and it goes far beyond the typical grumbling and chest-thumping about Obamas negotiating skills or scoring political points. This is about bedrock principles. Soul of the party kind of stuff.There are many ways to define and differentiate Democrats, but one critical way is on economic issues. On the one hand are the economic liberals, who believe in a government that protects those who need protecting and promises a social contract encouraging shared prosperity. This entails an ironclad commitment to earned benefits and social insurance programs, even if that might require increased tax revenues from the top income margins.
On the other side are what might be called the SPECs, or Socially Progressive Economic Conservatives. These are the party members and leaders focused more on issues like reproductive health or marriage equality, and less guided by economic fairness credos like protecting the poor, elderly, and sick. Some may even pride themselves on austerity, by capping property taxes while cutting public services, facing down unions representing working class Americans, and promoting what they call pro-business or pro-growth agendas.Just as Republicans are now undergoing their own noisy, awkwardly public process to figure out what they stand for, Democrats may soon find out which part of their party prevails on economic issues. The answer could have serious ramifications regarding the kind of support many Americans receive from their government during a historic recession. And who the Democratic party selects to lead it, a few years down the road.
http://www.buzzfeed.com/blakezeff/the-democrats-coming-civil-war
Not that this won't be an issue but it's like the media is trying to start something because they're bored.
Harmony Blue
(3,978 posts)meanwhile we are watching a full blown civil war with Republicans as we speak. Haha that is rich.
FSogol
(45,464 posts)Yawn.
CakeGrrl
(10,611 posts)Whatever it can find to distract from negative news for the GOP, it uses. The MSM isn't tired of the GOP; it's trying to cover for them.
el_bryanto
(11,804 posts)The truth of the matter is that progressives are pretty much cowed. For all the noise we make, we don't have the money or the votes to get the wall street guys on the top react to our issues.
It would be nice to believe we could; but barring a sea change (or real campaign finance reform) - it's unlikely to happen.
Bryant
Boomerproud
(7,949 posts)Money is power. Greed in good. That is human history and has always been so.
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)reformist2
(9,841 posts)I'm so sick of some pretty obvious solutions to the ever-growing cost of medical care being ignored, only because a handful of people on top like being able to engage in profiteering and price gouging. :/