Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

earthside

(6,960 posts)
1. What's Time Warner's problem?
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 10:31 AM
Jan 2013

It's not like they don't own and/or broadcast into other countries.

Or is this just another case of the corporate double standard?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_assets_owned_by_Time_Warner

Siwsan

(26,255 posts)
2. I don't know much about Time Warner
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 10:39 AM
Jan 2013

It's just kind of shocking that they dropped it so suddenly. I thought the transition wasn't going to take place for a couple of months, yet.

onenote

(42,660 posts)
3. Time Warner made clear it was going to drop underperforming networks some time ago
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 10:41 AM
Jan 2013

They dropped Ovation, an arts network, at the end of the year. It has been widely expected that Current would get the axe as soon as the opportunity presented itself. Other networks also probably will get cut in over the course of the coming year.

onenote

(42,660 posts)
10. They cut Current because the sale to Al Jazeera gave them the legal right and opportunity
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 11:28 AM
Jan 2013

As I said, its been widely known that Time Warner Cable had targeted Current, among other networks, to be dropped. Ovation went first. Current went now because under the terms of Current's contract with Time Warner Cable the sale of the network to anyone gave Time Warner Cable the right to drop the network. They could've sold it to just about anyone and unless there was some reason to think that the financial benefit to Time Warner Cable of keeping the network on its systems outweighed what it might get from some other use of the system's capacity, it was gone. http://www.tvpredictions.com/twc121912.htm

Siwsan

(26,255 posts)
8. I wonder what sort of ratings Al Jazeera usually gets
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 10:46 AM
Jan 2013

I really haven't heard anything bad about their news coverage. It would be great of they would keep a couple of the Current shows, like Stephanie Miller and TYT, even if they are tape delayed.

Well, at least I have Stephanie's podcast to listen to.

onenote

(42,660 posts)
5. By the way, your link is to a list of assets owned by Time Warner Inc. which is a different
Thu Jan 3, 2013, 10:43 AM
Jan 2013

company than Time Warner Cable. Time Warner Cable was spun off as a separate and independent company three years ago.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Unlike Time Warner, so fa...