Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

babylonsister

(171,056 posts)
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 06:44 PM Jan 2013

The Crack-Up of the GOP: No Way Out

http://www.boomantribune.com/story/2013/1/6/105318/4727

The Crack-Up of the GOP: No Way Out

by BooMan
Sun Jan 6th, 2013 at 10:53:18 AM EST


The Washington Post reports that there are divisions within the Republican Party about whether or not they can effectively use a threat to destroy the country's credit rating and cause a global recession to extract spending cuts from the Democrats. If they did it before, why not do it again?

Meanwhile, the New York Times focuses more on the big picture divisions like immigration, women's rights, gay marriage, and letting the NRA dictate the GOP's policy on guns.

In both cases, it is really a divide between conservatives and Republicans. The near-total capture of the GOP by conservatives has created a situation which has now come to a head. They call it the Conservative Movement for a reason. They have places to go. The problem is, the American people do not want to go there. The conundrum presents itself in stark terms in the debate over the debt ceiling. Countless Rush Limbaugh fans and Fox News watchers have been seduced into an alternative reality where they are both the good and the aggrieved. But they don't want to see the party destroy the country's credit rating, millions of jobs, and the value of their nest eggs, all in the name of reducing the worth of their earned benefits and eroding their retirement security. The conservatives carried the ball so far down the field that people are in the shadow of the goalposts. And they don't want to score.

snip//

The disastrous culmination of a 28-year campaign to make the rich richer and the middle class poorer was interpreted as the perfect time to launch a tax revolt on the behalf of people who had never paid lower taxes. At the peak moment for government spending, they launched a war on the only available economic stimulus that might save them their job, their home, and their savings. It was no surprise that the whole venture was financed by plunderous plutocrats in their desperate (and successful) attempt to cause a distraction big enough for them to evade accountability for their actions.

The conservative movement is too stupid to live, but the Republican Party is too advantaged by law to die. It would like to remake itself into a party that reflects the values of enough Americans for them to win. But conservatives would rather wallow in their own impotence and rage than change their core beliefs. The GOP will remain bitterly divided for quite some time. The splits will grow when we debate guns and when we debate immigration and when we debate climate and energy. The coalition cannot hold. The most reactionary of the bunch have the advantage of being correct about one thing. Without race-hatred and religious tribalism and gay-bashing and attacks on women's rights, the GOP has no coalition at all. It would simply scatter to the winds. So, they will persist.
31 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The Crack-Up of the GOP: No Way Out (Original Post) babylonsister Jan 2013 OP
K&R ! patrice Jan 2013 #1
K & R Still Sensible Jan 2013 #2
Perhaps they should start BainsBane Jan 2013 #3
I hope they split up like a giant iceberg flamingdem Jan 2013 #4
Was just listening to Media Matters on XM 'Left' Populist_Prole Jan 2013 #5
And the answer to their failures to win in the last election Ikonoklast Jan 2013 #7
That's a powerful image. n/t daleo Jan 2013 #28
I'm an old man coldbeer Jan 2013 #6
The GOP is fucked. randome Jan 2013 #9
It's more Flatpicker Jan 2013 #15
They may shoot some hostages, but Cons won't come out alive. Afterward, there will no more bluestate10 Jan 2013 #18
K&R This describes things perfectly..... wandy Jan 2013 #8
The thing is, they really are inept, but they are too stupid to realize it. They ReformedGOPer Jan 2013 #10
Welcome to DU. Donor state republicans are going to soon have to make a decision. bluestate10 Jan 2013 #19
Yeah, no other way... ReRe Jan 2013 #11
If the GOP is history why are we bargaining anything with them? Why are SS and Medicare xtraxritical Jan 2013 #12
It will a long, drawn out process. The GOP corpse will be stinking up the place for some time. randome Jan 2013 #20
Don't be so certain about what the Obama administration is doing. I suspect that bluestate10 Jan 2013 #22
As Obama pointed out recently, it's the House that is supposed to propose the bills. randome Jan 2013 #31
I surly hope you're both right. xtraxritical Jan 2013 #24
These types of articles make me worried that we'll let down our guard, like we did after 2008. SunSeeker Jan 2013 #13
I think we learned from 2010. I watched Chris Hayes and Melissa Harris Perry bluestate10 Jan 2013 #23
You make a very good point. We should be making viable coalitions. MissMarple Jan 2013 #27
Nicely put! nt SCVDem Jan 2013 #14
Sounds wonderful but so have such proclamations every few years for a generation or more TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #16
McCain/Palin. Romney/Ryan. Rove's immense failures. randome Jan 2013 #21
Totally on point, THANKS! nt Raine Jan 2013 #17
Big Fat Idiots libodem Jan 2013 #25
This nails it. RDANGELO Jan 2013 #26
Excellent read malaise Jan 2013 #29
I think immigration will be the big one. Motown_Johnny Jan 2013 #30

Populist_Prole

(5,364 posts)
5. Was just listening to Media Matters on XM 'Left'
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 07:34 PM
Jan 2013

The guest brought up an interesting point: Long term, the GOP is in trouble. The control that Fox News has on the GOP, which caused it to move so far right, is known by the party leadership to be a major or even insurmountable problem in maintaining viability of the GOP. The problem is, that the Fox News machine itself is doing very very well; and so they have no interest whatsover of doing anything other than the same demogoguery that works so well for them. The GOP can't yet ditch them because many believe they were instrumental in their success of 2010 and are still afraid of them.

Ikonoklast

(23,973 posts)
7. And the answer to their failures to win in the last election
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 07:43 PM
Jan 2013

is being given to them by Teabaggers: "Move even further to the Right!"


The GOP has no clue as how to stop it.

They are going to be eaten alive from within by a parasite.

coldbeer

(306 posts)
6. I'm an old man
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 07:40 PM
Jan 2013

I try, but reading left to right I am good for about this far.
The sentences fall off the page. When I swing back left
I guess where to start.



Flatpicker

(894 posts)
15. It's more
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 09:41 PM
Jan 2013

We're fucked.

I can't see how the Cons go down without causing damage to the country.
They will shoot the hostage before they surrender. That's how sick they are.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
18. They may shoot some hostages, but Cons won't come out alive. Afterward, there will no more
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:36 PM
Jan 2013

hostage taking.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
8. K&R This describes things perfectly.....
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 08:00 PM
Jan 2013

Now what "GOP co". Do you give up ground and work toward a reasonable solution, even if it ticks off you're owners.
or
Do you bury you're head in you're ideology and continue to perform you're owners bidding.

Going to be a hard choice for a party that "is too stupid to live".

ReformedGOPer

(478 posts)
10. The thing is, they really are inept, but they are too stupid to realize it. They
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 08:20 PM
Jan 2013

are a dying party, and our POTUS is running circles around them. They have no central core. And its rich to think that Faux noise is aiding and abetting their downfall.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
19. Welcome to DU. Donor state republicans are going to soon have to make a decision.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:47 PM
Jan 2013

Peter King, Michael Grimm and Chris Christie are just the tip of the iceberg, things will get worst for that trio and other donor state republicans before they either get defeated for office or quit the party. The shenanigans over Sandy relief funding highlights the start of that fight, Chris Christie pointing out rather starkly several times that New Jersey is a donor state that wouldn't ask for help unless it needed that help further drives a wedge into the republican party's core. Republicans ask for funding for Alabama and Louisiana, but demand offsets for aid to Joplin and midwest flooding for a reason, their objective is to damage places that have a tendency to vote blue on occasion, but their hatred for places that conservative republicans consider impure will be the factor that destroys the republican party.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
11. Yeah, no other way...
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 08:53 PM
Jan 2013
K&R

...to look at it: The GOP is definitely cracking up. They have Foxed-up themselves, right into a basement corner.
 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
12. If the GOP is history why are we bargaining anything with them? Why are SS and Medicare
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 09:15 PM
Jan 2013

"reforms" bandied about? I'm saying the current administration does not seem to think they're "out for the count".

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
20. It will a long, drawn out process. The GOP corpse will be stinking up the place for some time.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:48 PM
Jan 2013

But they HAVE boxed themselves into a corner and are much weaker now.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
22. Don't be so certain about what the Obama administration is doing. I suspect that
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:53 PM
Jan 2013

republicans are being led into another trap. Republicans must be forced to state exactly what they want to cut and how deep they want to make cuts. There shouldn't be an easy path out for republicans.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
31. As Obama pointed out recently, it's the House that is supposed to propose the bills.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:31 PM
Jan 2013

If these fuckers want the Senate or someone else to do their jobs, then we can call them on that.

SunSeeker

(51,550 posts)
13. These types of articles make me worried that we'll let down our guard, like we did after 2008.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 09:28 PM
Jan 2013

The "conservatives" (regressives) have more money than God. The fact that they are on the wrong side of history and demographics has not stopped them from taking over a majority of governorships and state legislatures. That is how they have been able to implement their voter suppression. Yes, they have a lot of clowns representing them, but their Koch Bros. overloads and others of their ilk are busy figuring out how to subvert the people's will. We can't assume they will die of natural causes.

bluestate10

(10,942 posts)
23. I think we learned from 2010. I watched Chris Hayes and Melissa Harris Perry
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 11:16 PM
Jan 2013

this morning. Both them and most of the guest described how we can't repeat 2010 again. The issue that worried me was the most progressive member of MHP's panel, he didn't seem to get that we need to establish coalitions and train candidates in the interior West and South and that those people won't mirror a northeast or west coast candidates. Fortunately, most of the panel got it, in particular one sharp operative got it and clearly pointed out what needed to be done. Howard Dean showed up as a guest and he clearly understood what needs to be done.

My biggest concern is with people that call themselves steadfast progressives and can't brook any one that doesn't fall within their idea of an "acceptable" democrat. Will steadfast progressives abandon the party was they did in 2010 and allow republicans to catch a breath? The hatred that I see for blue dogs posted all over DU causes me to question whether the people making those statements are willing to accept in true democrats that aren't their perfect model of a what a democrat is. My position on blue dogs is that if those people weren't true democrats, they would have gone independent or registered as republicans long ago. There is little to nothing for them in the districts that they run in when they identify with democrats. What but a committed person would face ridicule and rejection to run under a banner whose core values they don't share deep in their hearts? As things are, they share our core values, even as some of us work hard to reject them.

MissMarple

(9,656 posts)
27. You make a very good point. We should be making viable coalitions.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 06:21 PM
Jan 2013

Demanding ideological purity in politics is naive. It has certainly gotten the gop into the fine mess they are in now. We certainly don't need a redo of that. I admire Howard Dean.

TheKentuckian

(25,023 posts)
16. Sounds wonderful but so have such proclamations every few years for a generation or more
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:00 PM
Jan 2013

I think they face some structural obstacles that make their electoral math increasingly difficult in the next twenty years or so and has been tough for more than a decade despite Bush stealing/slipping away with two but their power is not that diminished at all.

I think the two terms of Reagan followed by the Poppy Bush term has created an overcompensation that began to show its faults almost as soon as it began, the hold on Congress began to falter and has been dicey ever since the "centrist" wave came in. Nobody considered maybe those perceived as technocratic weenies might not be the sweet spot for Commander in Chief or that on the heels of the civil rights act that there was a realignment that had to play out that impacted national elections that wasn't an issue in local ones the DLC busted up the economic connection.

I think they have successfully cross pollinated their ideology to the point they control the frame even as a minority and have enough political and media heft to overly influence the national conversation.

They are going nowhere until their ideology is rejected.

 

randome

(34,845 posts)
21. McCain/Palin. Romney/Ryan. Rove's immense failures.
Sun Jan 6, 2013, 10:50 PM
Jan 2013

The signs are there. This time the GOP truly is down and getting weaker.

RDANGELO

(3,433 posts)
26. This nails it.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 04:14 PM
Jan 2013

"Without race-hatred and religious tribalism and gay-bashing and attacks on women's rights, the GOP has no coalition at all. It would simply scatter to the winds. So, they will persist."

This is what is really holding the Republican party together and why it is so cultist. They pretend that there is some wisdom and logic to their ideology, but what is really behind it all is tribalism.

 

Motown_Johnny

(22,308 posts)
30. I think immigration will be the big one.
Mon Jan 7, 2013, 11:23 PM
Jan 2013

Some of them understand that without changing the percentage of their votes in the Hispanic community that they have no hope of continuing as a national party.

Others simply can't grasp the math and will resist any form of truly comprehensive reform.

The beautiful thing here is that we have already been outflanked on our left twice on this issue. Once with Reagan's reform and again with Shrub's attempt at reform. I doubt very much if we will allow this to happen a third time.

If the entire (R) party came out en mass for an open boarders policy we can counter with the demand for an open boarders policy, and a pony. If they agree to give us a pony we can then demand a monkey in a cowboy hat riding the pony. They will counter with just the monkey and not the hat which will give us the opportunity to demand not only a cowboy hat but balloon animals, and then a parade.

The (R)s will either need to accept a deal that will enrage a large portion of their base or continue to wear the label of being anti-immigrant and the party of white male privilege.

With any luck we can get a good immigration reform deal done And piss off the (R) base at the same time.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»The Crack-Up of the GOP: ...