General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums<sigh> It's true, heroes really do have feet of clay, this WWII cartoon made me sad
Until just a few minutes ago I had no idea one of my favorite children's authors would do something so.. so.. I really don't want to use the words.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)And what was considered acceptable and funny is very different from how things are now.
Really sad to see who drew that
Hanzip
(11 posts)Put cartoon turbans on those chaps and give them beards and that cartoon could have been drawn yesterday.
Marrah_G
(28,581 posts)Sadly, you are right
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)....a cartoon like the one you mentioned would not get published in a major legitimate news publication. At least not one that wasn't a bit more subtle about it.
And there would at least be an outcry. Back then, these things got printed and no one said a thing in opposition. God forbid if you did. I think it's one area we've improved.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)Welcome to DU.
Cooley Hurd
(26,877 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Which is why I didn't want to use the words that came to mind.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)was simply a bigot, oh well.
Nonsense. People who actually study the 1930's and 40's know far better than that. This cartoon is indeed a disgrace, regardless of the "era." People weren't fucking stupid in the 1940's. They knew what they were doing when they made stuff like this.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)I remember hearing that word well into the 50s. I remember watching movies and cartoons depicting them as toothy and stupid.
that era too. You are right about the words that come to mind.
narnian60
(3,510 posts)It really bugs me when people hate on some old movies or cartoons because of what they consider racist material. I am just glad we now realize by today's standards it is very wrong.
Hanzip
(11 posts)It's actually worst today than "back then"
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)By now you'd hope we would know better.
Then I read about the woman who pushed the Hindu man under the train in NY.
Brickbat
(19,339 posts)He is much more than just the Cat in the Hat.
http://www.brainpickings.org/index.php/2012/08/10/dr-seusss-wartime-propaganda-cartoons/
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)I appreciate the link but I don't think I'm going to click on it.
handmade34
(22,756 posts)"...The UMass Magazine explains, As a scholar of modern Japan, Richard Minear notes Dr. Seusss greater harshness with Japanese, as compared with German, subjects. But taken as a whole and with the exceptions he remarks upon, he finds the characterizations remarkably gentle. And, by 1954, Geisel had a change of heart, writing Horton Hears a Who! as an allegory for the nuclear bombing of Hiroshima and the U.S. occupation of Japan after the war. He concludes that a persons a person, and even dedicated the book to a Japanese friend..."
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)And I know the purpose of them but seeing Dr Seuss' name on that one was still a bit shocking to me, I'd never seen his war art before, didn't realize he went that far back.
Walk away
(9,494 posts)Some people stay racists forever.
AverageJoe90
(10,745 posts)I can still remember the weeks & months immediately following 9/11. There was panic everywhere; in the minds of many, myself included, it was something along the lines of, "If terrorists living in caves were able to hijack a whole set of four airliners and successfully ploughed all but one of 'em into the WTCs and the Pentagon, then who knows what more sophisticated outfits could be capable of? And who knows how many secret cells are out there ready to strike at a moment's noticed?"
deutsey
(20,166 posts)of Bugs Bunny fame and remember some similar caricatures in their wartime cartoons.
It was the times, I guess.
sir pball
(4,737 posts)Warning: the more sensitive here may very well never want anything to do with Warner Brothers again if they watch this. If you're easily offended, or carry a grudge, you've been warned:
deutsey
(20,166 posts)Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)that was fostered in order to get us into that war. Prior to Pearl Harbor, even FDR couldn't garner enough popular support among the people to involve us in "Europe's war".
We were familiar with the endless wars in Europe and wanted nothing to do with them, and the atrocities in Asia were far away and of no consequence to us as we were still digging our way out of the Great Depression.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)My father was an immigrant from Europe after WWII and his hatred for Germans was remarkable so I know a bit about that too.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)got those stories from that first-person perspective as well. While it is certainly the closest contemporary comparison, I don't think 9/11 was all that similar. We had already been softened by a couple of decades worth of propaganda and, frankly, we were/are a much more cynical people. As ineffective as it was (or effectively ignored), there was quite a bit of pushback after that attack, whereas in 1941 the outrage was nearly universal.
*It all being from coming west as an infant in a covered wagon, electricity, flight, etc.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)Had FDR gotten behind even the fairly popular anti-lynching campaigns of his time, the civil rights era would have kicked off 20 years earlier. His policy of look away on Costigan-Wagner is the single monumental disgrace of his Presidency to this day, though long forgotten and covered up now. Ironically, I think of FDR on Costigan-Wagner whenever people accuse Obama of "caving." FDR's behavior was far more egregious and craven, and yet he gets a pass. There's no doubt that the good of his Presidency mitigates his cowardice vis-a-vis the Southern senators, but still. You want a cave? Look at that.
Egalitarian Thug
(12,448 posts)that turned out to be better than horrible that we all tend to ignore the copious warts.
Personally, I think his saving the capitalist system from itself was a terrible injustice.
alcibiades_mystery
(36,437 posts)There were plenty of strong alternatives with good support in the 1930's.
The stuff the Left said about FDR before the '36 election would make even our Sarcastic Third Wayers blush.
hootinholler
(26,449 posts)madfloridian
(88,117 posts)Find the music to a song by Tom Russell. Here's a link to a sample....
http://www.emusic.com/listen/#/album/tom-russell/veterans-day-the-tom-russell-anthology/11314213/
I feel sad about that cartoon also.
We took their homes and put them here.
surrealAmerican
(11,357 posts)... only doing great and admirable things. Once he learned better, he did some great work. Isn't that good enough for you?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)My reaction is one of sadness, not hatred.
alphafemale
(18,497 posts)Propaganda.
They didn't portray westerners positively, either. Or treat them justly. That would go for anyone who was NOT Japanese.
Chinese and Korean people old enough to remember can tell you that.
Some of the most racist people on the planet ever are Japanese.
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Grew up in a time and place where racism was the norm although my parents were relatively enlightened by the then and there standards.
lynne
(3,118 posts)- we weren't there and can't walk in their shoes. Life was very different then and their life experience and knowledge at that time very different from what we know today.
None of us would want our actions of today judged by the standards and morals of an unknown future time.
lunatica
(53,410 posts)When you can pretty much figure out that future generations are going to judge everything we do, it gets easier to figure out what to do. Think of the legacy you're leaving them.