Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

GObamaGO

(665 posts)
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 10:46 PM Jan 2013

Someone explain this to me: RE: AIG

How can they on one hand, put out a "Thank You, America" ad campaign thanking US for bailing their sorry asses out, and on the other hand, simultaneously sue our government, read-we taxpayers, because they do not like the terms of the "already paid back" bailout?

16 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

GObamaGO

(665 posts)
3. I completely agree
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 10:52 PM
Jan 2013

The ads were enough to make my head explode. Hearing about the possible lawsuit brought that to an entirely new level of beyond the pale.

 

banned from Kos

(4,017 posts)
2. Its the shareholders suing the US government - not the company.
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 10:49 PM
Jan 2013

Although the company is considering it too.

But dealing with pissed off shareholders is not something they want to do either. In the end they won't join the lawsuit which is destined to fail anyway.

arthritisR_US

(7,286 posts)
7. I did not know that. The suing shareholders
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 10:59 PM
Jan 2013

names should be published so they can enjoy their time in the limelight.

customerserviceguy

(25,183 posts)
9. I figured that's why the company ran the commercials a few days ago
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 11:11 PM
Jan 2013

they had some advanced notice that this shareholder was going to do something extremely stupid. Otherwise, why would they spend money on advertising?

I figure this is going nowhere, otherwise the American public would retalitate big time. AIG cannot afford to look like PIG.

JDPriestly

(57,936 posts)
15. How can the shareholders prove they were damaged.
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 12:29 AM
Jan 2013

Any claim about losses would be strictly speculative since the entire company was on the brink of failure. That's my impression, but maybe I am missing something here.

geckosfeet

(9,644 posts)
14. What's to explain? It should be obvious. They are mercenary, backstabbing, black hearted psychopaths
Tue Jan 8, 2013, 11:36 PM
Jan 2013

who care only about sucking the life blood out of anything unfortunate enough to cross their path.

longship

(40,416 posts)
16. The same corporate malfeasance that gave rise to Joseph Cassano!
Wed Jan 9, 2013, 01:46 AM
Jan 2013

And here he is:


He is the single guy who crashed the world economy. BTW, he isn't in prison because what he did was all legal.

Read about it here: The Big Short: Inside the Doomsday Machine, by Michael Lewis.

We're screwed. The 2008-2009 bailouts were orchestrated by the very institutions that caused a near global economic meltdown.

Another read which will have you sick to your stomach: Too Big To Fail by Andrew Ross Sorkin. The story behind Treasury's 800 billion dollar bailout. Also, a good HBO movie: here. An all star cast. Scary shit went down; and Paulson did not have a clue of what was happening. They were more worried about politics.

And it hasn't changed since then.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Someone explain this to m...