Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Time to invade Iran. (Original Post) Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 OP
That's what it sounds like. nt valerief Jan 2012 #1
No, it's not. Only if you're paranoid does it sound like that. nt TheWraith Jan 2012 #8
Well, I guess all Americans have been paranoid the past ten years. nt valerief Jan 2012 #11
I heard that too XemaSab Jan 2012 #2
No options off the table montanacowboy Jan 2012 #3
I heard that. It is EXACTLY the same thing that Bush said annabanana Jan 2012 #4
Indeed slay Jan 2012 #6
That got the whole fucking chamber off their asses to cheer and clap Autumn Jan 2012 #5
Wut? Cali_Democrat Jan 2012 #7
We'll do whatever it takes. AngryOldDem Jan 2012 #9
"Any bets on when the next conflict starts?" 10th Anniversary of the Liberation of Iraq? /nt Saving Hawaii Jan 2012 #10

annabanana

(52,791 posts)
4. I heard that. It is EXACTLY the same thing that Bush said
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:10 PM
Jan 2012

about Iraq. This even in the face of the following:

http://consortiumnews.com/2012/01/24/usisrael-iran-not-building-nukes/

Recent comments by U.S and Israeli military leaders indicate that the intelligence services of the two countries agree that Iran has not decided to build a nuclear bomb, a crack in the Western narrative that the U.S. press corps won’t accept, as ex-CIA analyst Ray McGovern explains.

By Ray McGovern

Has Iran decided to build a nuclear bomb? That would seem to be the central question in the current bellicose debate over whether the world should simply cripple Iran’s economy and inflict severe pain on its civilian population or launch a preemptive war to destroy its nuclear capability while possibly achieving “regime change.”

And if you’ve been reading the New York Times or following the rest of the Fawning Corporate Media, you’d likely assume that everyone who matters agrees that the answer to the question is yes, although the FCM adds the caveat that Iran insists its nuclear program is for peaceful purposes only. The line is included with an almost perceptible wink and an “oh, yeah.”

However, a consensus seems to be emerging among the intelligence and military agencies of the United States – and Israel – that Iran has NOT made a decision to build a nuclear weapon. In recent days, that judgment has been expressed by high-profile figures in the defense establishments of the two countries – U.S. Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Israel’s Defense Minister Ehud Barak.
 

slay

(7,670 posts)
6. Indeed
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:12 PM
Jan 2012

i don't know what to think of Obama anymore. he seems more to the right - although with a bit of a populist tone - than ever. ugh.

AngryOldDem

(14,061 posts)
9. We'll do whatever it takes.
Tue Jan 24, 2012, 11:14 PM
Jan 2012

Of course, we'll try diplomacy first.

I also noted how in almost the next breath he pledged continued support of Israel.

Any bets on when the next conflict starts?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Time to invade Iran.