Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 03:09 PM Jan 2013

Krugman: WH tells him that it is absolutely, positively not going to cave

I get calls. The White House insists that it is absolutely, positively not going to cave or indeed even negotiate over the debt ceiling — that it rejected the coin option as a gesture of strength, as a way to put the onus for avoiding default entirely on the GOP.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/01/13/by-george/

19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: WH tells him that it is absolutely, positively not going to cave (Original Post) cthulu2016 Jan 2013 OP
it is up to the boner to come up with a bill Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #1
And he believes them? DJ13 Jan 2013 #2
He said that he believes they believe it but he will wait and see dsc Jan 2013 #5
Lets hope they do DJ13 Jan 2013 #6
Yes, why tip your hand in advance? truebluegreen Jan 2013 #10
Do you think the WH will cave?.. Stuart G Jan 2013 #3
No. Because caving means giving in. And we already know that forestpath Jan 2013 #7
+100 Myrina Jan 2013 #11
Ah, but Jackpine Radical Jan 2013 #16
This is what's wrong with DU now elias7 Jan 2013 #18
I think the WH will be resolute on the debt ceiling and cave on the budget itself cthulu2016 Jan 2013 #13
You may be right. dawg Jan 2013 #14
Krug has a pretty low definition of what constitutes caving bluestateguy Jan 2013 #4
I don't recall PK calling the final cliff deal a cave. dawg Jan 2013 #15
They don't cave, they do as they intend. TheKentuckian Jan 2013 #8
Cave?... NO. They will just call it something else. bvar22 Jan 2013 #9
I am glad that the President is taking a principled stand... humbled_opinion Jan 2013 #12
Do the idiots who claimed Obama was going to CAVE in the fiscal cliff deal JoePhilly Jan 2013 #17
I hope so but I've heard that many, many times before. Kablooie Jan 2013 #19

DJ13

(23,671 posts)
6. Lets hope they do
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 03:29 PM
Jan 2013

I still think they should not have given up on the coin idea, even if they had no plans of doing it.

The WH has a bad habit of giving up on any leverage they might have against the GOP ahead of negotiations.

They've done that far too often.

 

truebluegreen

(9,033 posts)
10. Yes, why tip your hand in advance?
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 04:52 PM
Jan 2013

It's more bargaining with yourself and they HAVE done it far too often.

 

forestpath

(3,102 posts)
7. No. Because caving means giving in. And we already know that
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 03:36 PM
Jan 2013

Obama wants to cut Social Security. So if he puts that on the table again, it isn't caving because it's something he already wants to do.

elias7

(3,997 posts)
18. This is what's wrong with DU now
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 11:32 PM
Jan 2013

This kind of snarky sarcastic comment is cyber bullying, whether you wish to admit it or not. Can't find many threads anymore without this kind of crap.

cthulu2016

(10,960 posts)
13. I think the WH will be resolute on the debt ceiling and cave on the budget itself
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:09 PM
Jan 2013

I believe that Obama thinks there is a real principle involved with debt ceiling terrorism.

dawg

(10,622 posts)
14. You may be right.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 08:25 PM
Jan 2013

The debt ceiling is not the real battle. The expiration of the continuing resolution is when everything will be decided.

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
4. Krug has a pretty low definition of what constitutes caving
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 03:22 PM
Jan 2013

As in, if you don't get 100% of what you asked for, then you "caved".

The so-called fiscal cliff deal was by all accounts a win for Obama and the progressives (most Progressive caucus members voted for it in the House, as well as Bernie Sanders). Our side got most of what we wanted, the other side only got a little. But Krug called it a "cave".

bvar22

(39,909 posts)
9. Cave?... NO. They will just call it something else.
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 04:43 PM
Jan 2013
"We couldn't let the Perfect be the Enemy of the Good."

"Sensible Americans will see this as a Step in the Right Direction."

"We saved our Children from the crushing burden of The Deficit."

"We protected Social Security."

"You don't understand how government works."

"Obama now looks like the sensible one."

"Nobody got what they wanted...so that makes it a Good Deal."

"Compromise is the foundation of democracy."

"This wasn't a "cave". It was a HUGE VICTORY. Add it to The List."

"It was ALL Joe Lieberman's fault."





humbled_opinion

(4,423 posts)
12. I am glad that the President is taking a principled stand...
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 05:55 PM
Jan 2013

but the way the teaheads where I work are framing this is that the continuing resolutions of the 2009 budget are unsustainable. They claim that the extraordinary spending levels put in the 2009 budget were only meant for that year to combat the recession and should have been rebalanced after 2009 but that the Sentate has not taken up a real budget since 2009.

I wonder where the truth really is on this because it does seem that popular opinion is of the position that there is a serious deficit and debt problem in the country and something must be done.

Don't people on our side think that this is really an opportunity to discuss real reforms that would bring in the revenue needed to combat the debt, in other words take the options of cutting federal programs directly off the table by fixing any real or perceived issues with the sustainability of spending levels and the sustainability of programs like S.S. by offerring real solutions like these:

VAT (could be as low as 3 percent, value added tax on everything except food)

Wealth Luxury tax with a 25 percent surcharge on top of VAT for all single item purchases over 50K property exemption to 250K.

Banking Transaction tax. (could be less than a penny per)

Wall Street trading transaction tax. (cold be less than a penny per)

Firearms ownership annual tax (doesn't need to be severe but needed to establish revenue for safeguards on schools)

Ammunition (surcharge tax on materials or ammo)

These options will eliminate the deficit immediatley on implementation and cause a massive surplus that will bring the national debt down massively over a very short period of time.

These options could be tried on a temporary basis with the President out front leading the charge with a JFK like call for ...."asking what we can do for our country.... "



JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
17. Do the idiots who claimed Obama was going to CAVE in the fiscal cliff deal
Sun Jan 13, 2013, 10:12 PM
Jan 2013

have short term memory issues?

I'm betting yes.

Kablooie

(18,623 posts)
19. I hope so but I've heard that many, many times before.
Mon Jan 14, 2013, 02:34 AM
Jan 2013

Sorry I don't have faith.

Fool me once, shame on you, fool me 33 times, shame on you, fool me 34 times, shame on me.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman: WH tells him tha...