Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

The Straight Story

(48,121 posts)
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 12:32 PM Jan 2012

Judges Weigh HIV-Infected Man's Fight To Get Job

Judges Weigh HIV-Infected Man's Fight To Get Job
.

ATLANTA (AP) — A panel of federal judges appeared skeptical Wednesday of the Atlanta police department's decision to reject a job application from an HIV-infected man.

The 40-year-old man sued the city in 2010, claiming he was denied a police officer job solely because he has the virus. Atlanta attorneys argued there are other officers on the force with HIV and the police department that it has no blanket policy disqualifying candidates with the virus. Gay rights groups and police agencies are closely following the case.

One of the three judges signaled the lawsuit would likely be sent back to a lower judge to reconsider.
..
The man sued under the pseudonym Richard Roe and has requested anonymity because he believes his medical condition could prevent him from other job opportunities. He said in an interview he was a former criminal investigator with the city of Los Angeles who discovered he had HIV in 1997, but that it didn't hinder his ability to perform his duties.

http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=145839626

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judges Weigh HIV-Infected Man's Fight To Get Job (Original Post) The Straight Story Jan 2012 OP
du rec. nt xchrom Jan 2012 #1
It's sad that 30 years later, this discrimination is still happening. Avalux Jan 2012 #2
The doc's statement, if cited accurately, is outrageous - pinto Jan 2012 #3

pinto

(106,886 posts)
3. The doc's statement, if cited accurately, is outrageous -
Wed Jan 25, 2012, 01:04 PM
Jan 2012

"...the doctor advised the department to limit Roe's interaction with the public."

The case should be a no brainer under the ADA.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Judges Weigh HIV-Infected...