General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMan shops at Utah JCPenney while carrying assault rifle
A man in Riverdale, Utah walked into a local JCPenney department store this week armed to the teeth, carrying a holstered handgun, a semi-automatic assault rifle and extra clips on his belt.
The strange display of firepower was enough to draw a scene, with bystanders taking photos and making concerned comments to one another. Images of the man published to Facebook caused a stir in the community and got the attention of ABC 4 in Salt Lake City.
The woman who took the photo that got the most attention said it happened on Wednesday, just four hours after President Barack Obama announced a series of executive orders relating to firearms.
Utah state law, however, says the mans actions are legal, provided the weapons were unloaded. The man was not positively identified, and JCPenneys public relations team did not respond to a request for comment.
Raw Story (http://s.tt/1yDSE)
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)They get to make their statement and enjoy being at the center of a kerfluffle standing on a 2A molehill
But they also divert attention of security.
They care much less for society than they do for their desire to be the center of attention.
Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)probably ends up generating more gun sales with people who are uncomfortable/nervous with these displays of private firepower.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)reasons.
Lot's of people seek their narcissistic supply in marginally acceptable ways.
TxRider
(2,183 posts)He's just being an activist for the cause he believes in. I fail to see a problem.
I mean his actions aren't even up to the level of civil disobedience, as he is breaking no law.
One person's activist is another persons arsehole, moron, whatever the insult of the day is.
Paladin
(28,252 posts)A guy strolling into a store with an assault rifle plainly visible, and people are supposed to just accept it as something normal? As if the incidents in Newtown, CT and Aurora, CO (and dozens of other occurrences before them) never happened? Just because it's somehow legal, sure as hell doesn't make it right.
PatrynXX
(5,668 posts)Think somewhere someone finally banned public nudity.. in CA. zzzz oh but one can carry a full to the rack up his ass gun collection...
Personally I'd rather see like no dress code at the mall. that someone trying to give a few of us heart attacks. oh well the nudity might cause blindness but whoops.
MotherPetrie
(3,145 posts)taught_me_patience
(5,477 posts)sasha031
(6,700 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Being that is usually quite small when one overcompensates in this way.
sasha031
(6,700 posts)This is happening more frequently, how is it people are screaming about it.
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)RandiFan1290
(6,229 posts)galileoreloaded
(2,571 posts)they are getting away with murder!
Aldo Leopold
(685 posts)valerief
(53,235 posts)april
(1,148 posts)Ruby the Liberal
(26,219 posts)LuckyLib
(6,819 posts)bowens43
(16,064 posts)Old and In the Way
(37,540 posts)Sorry, but anyone who feels compelled to carry these weapons in public, is already a strange dude. At the very least, someone with paranoid and anti-social tendencies. What a joke - OK because the weapon was unloaded....like he couldn't snap the magazine in the rifle and start another massacre in seconds.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)not long ago.
It had the desired effect of getting her attention. Calls among leaders of local congregations revealed she's been trolling houses of worship.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)then they be the "Ye, of little faith" type. I mean, if one really believes in God, then bringing a gun is saying you don't trust in God.
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)It's not really possible to be inside her head, but she visited a variety of non-denominational other than funadamentalist assemblies in the area.
People have all manner of emotional needs that don't necessarily interfere with their daily function, to me she seemed to be enjoying the attention avalanches she tripped by skiing along a steep slope whose downside is trouble.
siligut
(12,272 posts)Being facetious, I don't want to read any gun craziness this morning.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)do they also have the "one left in the chamber" type problem that some handguns have when you take the clip out, but one bullet has already been locked in? People sometimes take the clip out and think it is now unloaded without realizing that one bullet is still in there ready to fire.
Do these things have that kind of possible oops shooting?
AtheistCrusader
(33,982 posts)Most semi-auto weapons would have that issue.
Full auto maybe not. Some fire from a position called an 'open bolt', in which case the chamber would be empty.
This is the reason for firearm handling rule #1: All firearms are always loaded, period.
I have friends that are no longer allowed to handle firearms in my home, or in my presence at the range or gravel pit, due to violations of this rule.
AAO
(3,300 posts)and he should forfeit his license until he is deemed fit to join the "normal" gun-toting society.
ElboRuum
(4,717 posts)Just some knucklehead trying to make a point and doing it in the most obnoxious way possible.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)proud2BlibKansan
(96,793 posts)Enrique
(27,461 posts)Utah state law, however, says the mans actions are legal, provided the weapons were unloaded.
hack89
(39,171 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)Cali_Democrat
(30,439 posts)hack89
(39,171 posts)if they don't like it they can always change their laws.
Judging from the picture, it looks like many people didn't care that much.
klyon
(1,697 posts)Is this to desensitize us so when they do plan on shooting no one will question them before they get a chance to get to where they want to shoot. Is this reasonable behavior in a mall?
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)If these guns can have a bullet in the chamber, then they absolutely can not have it in there. I mean logically, not legally, yet.
Too many idiot gun owners. Hell they accident ly shoot themselves this way. Why should be be subjected to it?
Did you see the video of idiot gun owners and their guns going off accidentally in just this way plus other stupid moves by the owners? It's really kind of funny. I have a link to it further down in one of my post. It is a must see video.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)arely staircase
(12,482 posts)just posted the same thought. yes, it there does appear to be one. of course it still may be legal to have an unloaded magazine in the weapon and it be considered unloaded. although the simplest way to assure that it isn't loaded w/more than one potential round in the chamber is to prohibit the insertion of the magazine, or hey, here is an idea, don't let people walk around the mall with loaded guns strapped all over them regardless.
secondvariety
(1,245 posts)to see the magazine in the BW photos of my local newspaper.
arely staircase
(12,482 posts)but if the mag is unloaded then so is the gun, right? i don't know how that state's law is written. but it does seem to me there is a magazine sticking out of that weapon.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Whisp
(24,096 posts)Last Stand
(472 posts)People who bark about 2nd Amendment rights relating are the lunatic fringe--even for the average gun owner. I don't think most people see hand guns and assault rifles in the same light.
Go ahead--put those assault rifles in everyone's face. You don't represent us. You don't represent the Constitution.
The backlash is already on the way.
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Hugabear
(10,340 posts)bunnies
(15,859 posts)Terrorists.
RC
(25,592 posts)The very act of being in public that heavily armed, is, or at least should be, an act of terrorism. It scares the populace unnecessarily. How is that not terrorism? It also has to be bad for business.
If he is that paranoid, that he thinks he needs his guns in public, that alone proves he should not be allowed to possess them.
How is anyone supposed to know that he doesn't have one in the chamber? Is he even sure, one way or the other?
Pity that guy if another armed someone, still shell shocked from another mass shooting shows up. Another public massacre waiting to happen.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)All these assholes wandering around with these kinds of weapons. How long before they make US look like the countries they despise so much? They "love" America alright. Yeah. Whats not to love about a country where you feel you need a frigging weapon (or TWO) to go shopping?!
RC
(25,592 posts)Got his weapons training from Hollywood shoot'em up action movies.
bunnies
(15,859 posts)that thing would be IMPOSSIBLE to grab right off his back.
cynzke
(1,254 posts)an amatuer to me. Weapon slung behind him and out of his immediate control. If loaded, someone could come up behind him, grab it and pull the trigger killing bystanders. This idiot is totally vulnerable to some nutcase who could walk up behind him in line and simply pull out a concealed weapon and pop a few rounds into this guy's head or torso despite the fact he is armed to the teeth. Stringing yourself with weapons like a Christmas tree isn't necessarily going to protect you if some nut is determined to get you.
jorno67
(1,986 posts)If I were ever going to rob a department store - I would shoot this guy on site and then proceed with the already scheduled crime...
nick of time
(651 posts)because by now, the police are on the way to check out this moron and you don't want to be in the middle of a robbery with the cops there.
jorno67
(1,986 posts)It's just that every time I see some jack ass like this I see it as them wearing a big ass target one their back if something really did go down.
nick of time
(651 posts)In fact, this NRA Terrorist is even worse for security than on first glance.
If you had a tiny gun, maybe even a high power slingshot, your first target would be the back of his head. Then grab his Precious and start mowing people down.
The Delicate Flowers' mega-paranoia is their type of mental illness.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)If these jokers keep this idiocy up, one of them is bound to find out this display could turn out to be a very bad idea, if they get surrounded by police and shot because they think he might be going for his gun.
How the hell are people supposed to know these freaks aren't the latest mass shooter, and about ready to start their killing spree?
nick of time
(651 posts)And if not, then he's doing nothing illegal to warrant a visit by SWAT.
He's an idiot, but under Utah law, he's doing nothing illegal, he might get a visit by a cop to see if the firearm is unloaded, but SWAT won't be sent.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)I don't live in Utah.
nick of time
(651 posts)global1
(25,241 posts)global1
(25,241 posts)Logical
(22,457 posts)Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)he thinks he is. The kind of stupid he possesses surely comes with some lack of self control.
Logical
(22,457 posts)TheBlackAdder
(28,183 posts)I'm sure customers were wondering if this guy will snap.
Could it be that the guy suffers from steroid induced impotence and this forces him to overcompensate?
HereSince1628
(36,063 posts)and he got it.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)or refused to give him a refund. Will he use that weapon?
msongs
(67,395 posts)nick of time
(651 posts)Not in Utah. He's an attention seeking moron, but he's not breaking any law.
Supply Side Jesus
(2,528 posts)lapfog_1
(29,199 posts)utterly stupid. But almost any day that I was grocery shopping at Safeway, there would be people strolling in as if they were on their way to a gun show or a active war zone.
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)Mutatis Mutandis
(90 posts)Man carries assault rifle to Obama protest -- and it's legal
http://articles.cnn.com/2009-08-17/politics/obama.protest.rifle_1_protesters-weapons-assault-rifle?_s=PM
uponit7771
(90,335 posts)...lol...that was a pretty good attempt though
humbled_opinion
(4,423 posts)if you really reflect on it you may see just how stereotypical your comment sounds....
Hoyt
(54,770 posts)99Forever
(14,524 posts)... NEED to be "protected" at all times.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)It may not be illegal but if I can't get in without shirt or shoes, then he definitely should not get in with that.
No Shirt, No Shoes, No sense, No Service
If the stores lose business because whacko John is present with his weapons, then they will make it a rule. Make JC Penny's a gun free zone. (as well as starbucks, Pizza Hut and all stores catering to real customers)
You can take em on the street, but you can't bring em shopping.
Want to stop this? Have a black guy do it.
quinnox
(20,600 posts)got 250 feet into the store. That is, if he wasn't just shot on sight first. You know it and I know it. Same with a "Muslim" looking guy.
But a white guy can get away with this shit, no problemo, especially in white and ultra right wing Utah.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)But I will leave any store very loudly if I see anyone other than a security guard with a gun. They will know why I left. They will know why I won't be back. With any luck, others will follow.
Keep your God damned guns at home. This is not a militarized zone. Yet, anyway.
mike dub
(541 posts)And if they don't make it a gun free zone, I think they could, on case by case basis, tell the moron he is disturbing paying-customers and he needs to leave the store. A store is private property, state law to open-carry not withstanding (I believe a property lessee/owner could do this in stores here in the South, and I'd think they could even in wild west Utah). If he doesn't leave, then the store's management could call the law re; man refuses to leave store when asked/trespassing complaint.
Prog_gun_owner
(54 posts)Because that worked so well.
I don't think this guy needs an ar15 and what he is doing is stupid. But I don't support making every place a gun free zone, because the moment you do, then the nut jobs know where to go to kill the most people possible before they meet any resistance at all.
I think that you should be able to bring a reasonable self defense weapon with you most places, but such a display as this is not reasonable and only hurts the ideals of how a responsible gun owner should exorcize their right to bear arms.
note to jury:
Yes, I am a new poster, but I have lurked for many years, and I wish to join the discussion here on DU. Most of my views are progressive, except when it comes to fire arms. I don't ascribe to NRA talking points, but I don't support taking fire arms away from law abiding citizens either. The crooks will get them legal or not. Law abiding citizens should be able to get them as well, provided they pass a background check. I'm all for a "well regulated militia" in that I think that at the very least, all states should be "shall issue CCW" provided the license holder passes a background check, and possibly a psyc evaluation.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Last edited Sun Jan 20, 2013, 10:37 AM - Edit history (1)
largest part of the "gots ta carry my gun in public, coz I the man", crowd.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10022220602
This is why we don't want assholes with guns out where we are.
Keep em at home with mom. Or, at the very least, in your car.
We don't want your so called protection, and if you are afraid to shop at a store like Penny's without a gun, then the sign on the door might just say NO WIMPS instead of no guns.
Oops sorry that video is to the gun appreciation day shootings. This is the one you should see.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/17/gun-fails-second-amendment-rights-gone-wrong_n_2490579.html
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)This is one reason why we don't want assholes with guns where we shop, play, or work.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/01/17/gun-fails-second-amendment-rights-gone-wrong_n_2490579.html
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Swords, axes, flails, crossbows, polearms, and other weapons as well?
mwb970
(11,358 posts)I am so sick of this phrase already, and the argument has barely begun. It seems to be mostly Fox "News" viewers and Limbaugh listeners who use it, so I was assuming it was just the usual parroting and dittoheadery. Now here it is from Prog_gun_owner, who I guess is a progressive.
Could we possibly have a "gun free zone" free day? Just for a change.
Yavin4
(35,437 posts)If I saw him, I'd run in terror.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)I would have just stormed out, protesting loudly, throwing my items to purchase on the counter.
But if I ran screaming and freaked out, perhaps even needing medical attention to calm me, they would have to reconsider if they want to change store policy a bit.
(yeah, I would)
No shirt, no shoes, no sense, no service.
If I can't shop there without my shirt, he should not be allowed to shop there with that thing. I can't imagine any stores that would actually want this guy in there. Accidents happen and they would probably be sued. And so what is to stop the robber from just strolling in with his gun?
A Brand New World
(1,119 posts)telling the clerks my reason for leaving & never coming back. You've presented my thoughts & feelings exactly. Plus I would legitimately be screaming and freaked out.
bongbong
(5,436 posts)Shoot the NRA Terrorist first and say you felt threatened and wanted to stand your ground.
ecstatic
(32,685 posts)I imagine he'd be shot pretty quickly if he got into an aggressive confrontation with a concealed carry person. His ill timed display of firepower could force people to take the most aggressive action possible to protect themselves.
Do something mildly aggressive, like cut in line (making sure there aren't direct witnesses or surveillance cameras watching), let him start mouthing off, and them - BLAMMO!
On second thought, I realize you could really fuck with that (or any similar terrorist) Delicate Flower if you wanted. Find a cop with a gun (easy if you have a friend in that line of work), station him somewhere nearby, and create the aforementioned situation. Let the cop take him down.
I'm sure the DU Delicate Flowers will have their panties in an ESPECIAL twist if they read this post.
ecstatic
(32,685 posts)I think carrying should be outlawed. I shouldn't have to "trust" that an asshole like that will do the right thing. This guy is a terrorist; his sole intention was to intimidate everyone in the room. And if I saw someone like that, I wouldn't stick around taking pictures.
Gregorian
(23,867 posts)rightsideout
(978 posts)The black pants matches the gun sash. I would suggest a decorative bullet belt that has brass bullets to match the yellow shirt. He may want to consider a matching earring.
Rider3
(919 posts)pure and simple.
marmar
(77,073 posts)....... other than, 'I'm an insecure asshole.'
frylock
(34,825 posts)if ever I do.
wackadoo wabbit
(1,166 posts)I was at our local Office Max here in semi-rural Arizona a couple of months ago and saw that the idiot in front of me in line was carrying a gun. I turned to my husband and said in a normal tone of voice, "Did you know that men who carry guns have been shown to have small dicks?" The cashier looked up, startled; my poor husband cringed a bit (although he knows I'm a bit outspoken sometimes, so he wasn't too surprised); but the best response was from the guy with the gun. He sort of shrank into himself, stuttered a bit when he finished with the cashier, and quickly left. It was obvious that he had heard me and equally obvious that he was embarrassed.
I like to think that maybe he thought twice before strapping on that gun the next time he went to a store.
Boudica the Lyoness
(2,899 posts)But thank you for your concern.
sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)drive out of the town, out of the state, and fly out of the country.
Vietnameravet
(1,085 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)nt
LonePirate
(13,417 posts)Isn't this a visual equivalent of the old "yelling 'Fire!' in a crowded theatre" taunt?
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)russspeakeasy
(6,539 posts)Paladin
(28,252 posts)But as usual, all this open carry incident amounted to was the usual public intimidation and bullying. Assuming that the firearms were unloaded, and thus conformed with Utah law, doesn't make it any better. What the hell kind of situation are we in, when it's lawful to engage in this sort of terroristic act? This guy got away with it because he's white. If a dark-complected person had done the same thing, it would have been a lot different.
global1
(25,241 posts)Ian David
(69,059 posts)What if someone saw him and thought, "Oh my god, he's walking into J.C. Penney with an assault weapon because he's mad they're using Ellen as their spokesperson! I'd better drop him NOW!"
Duer 157099
(17,742 posts)OK maybe it is unloaded, but does he carry ammo with him? If so, how long does it take to lock and load? So, he's carrying immense "potential" fire power.
So he's legal until he loads. But it only takes seconds to go from legal unloaded to illegal loaded and deadly lethal.
If he doesn't carry ammo, then what is the point of having the gun?
Ergo, he must be carrying ammo. Which means he is only a few seconds away from being deadly lethal.
Do we need to have cops following these people around every where they go, waiting for them to load?
WTF?
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)it takes a fraction of a second to jack a fresh magazine in the gun. It's a standard counter argument for them. The cog dis is strong in these suckers.
NashuaDW
(90 posts)New Hampshire is also an Open Carry state and we frequently have people exercise that right.
It is kinda funny to see people from neighboring Massachusetts panic and call the police.
BTW, the No Shirt, No Shoes, No Service is a store policy ... not a law.
Robyn66
(1,675 posts)You dont see people waking around with AK47's walking around. THere was one guy in town who had a bunch of guns strapped to him, and when he blew his brains out everyone said they were wondering when it would happen not IF.
It is not normal to terrorize people in public places no matter where you are. ANd you can be smug and put it on the people who dont have guns all you want but most people in the wake of all of the shootings will justifyably be fearful if they see some jerk walk in with an AK 47 strapped on. Anyone who does that is knowingly terrorizing people and is doing it TO terrorize people. And in NH if you saw someone go in to a store with an AK47 strapped on and called 911 the police WOULD come and it wouldnt be "shame on the people for being frighted" it would be "why are you being such an asshole" get out now.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)and No Guns needs to be too. I mean like I said before, if one is too frightened to shop without a gun, then maybe one should stay home anyway.
The sign might need to say NO WIMPS and that should cover the guys who think they need one of these things in a fucking store.
This guy thinks he is helping the pro carry meme, but as you can see, he is progressing the anti carry meme much further than we could do without him.
I guess we should thank the fool
Or better yet, lets protest by thousands of people going to the store with no shoes. They want to kick us out but not him? THen, only one warning before we remove the shirts. Get that wimp ass bastard out of the store or my bra comes off. Only one warning. Oh, they will regret that. lol
kairos12
(12,852 posts)Robb
(39,665 posts)According to Kelley, the rifle was an unloaded AR-15 and the handgun was a loaded Glock 19C. He said he has a concealed-carry permit, is a former member of the military and contacted police dispatch before leaving his home to tell them about his plans. Kelley also said he was told that he was "well within his rights" and that bystanders reactions were positive.
"I felt no negative vibes from anyone," Kelley said. "I think it went rather surprisingly well."
Kelley added that he carries weapons to protect children and other people from "criminals, cartels, drug lords" and other "evil men."
sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)says the Glock was loaded. Is Utah one of the idiot states that makes it illegal for a private person, church, or store to prevent the gun crazies from carrying on their property? We have a state representative that is bound and determined to let anybody on my campus carry a loaded gun. When that passes, I retire.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)that you are a professor/lecturer at the U of A? I also assume you know the sad story of Professor John Locke? That incident is reason enough to permanently ban guns on campus.
sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)the church pews!
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)So I looked him up. I hope the rest of the legislature has enough sense to nip this crap in the bud. But now that it's controlled by Republicans...
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)But where is his badge?
"Jason Chapman, the firearms supervisor for the Utah Department of Public Safety, said a person with a concealed-carry permit may carry a loaded gun publicly. Permit holders are not required to conceal their guns. People without permits are only allowed to carry unloaded weapons in public, Chapman said."
--where I come from, "just cuz it's legal don't make it right"....
JoePhilly
(27,787 posts)he knows the average person will assume that a guy carrying an AR-15 might be nuts, and call the police.
Clearly he is IRONY deficient.
Ian David
(69,059 posts).... and ROBOTS!
Tierra_y_Libertad
(50,414 posts)Like someone, who isn't an idiot, is going up to someone who has the brain power of boiled turnips and an assault rifle to prove it, and tell him it's time to grow up.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)"...and YOU people be REAL nice to me, y'hear?....."
Lars39
(26,109 posts)in dealing with this kind of exhibition might not be correct. He received only *positive* feedback while out and about. What if people started heckling him?
Nothing too confrontatonal, just enough murmurings, snickering and sarcasm to make him feel uncomfortable.
MADem
(135,425 posts)He's "protecting children and other people?"
No--he's scaring the living shit out of them.
If he want to protect people, he needs to get off his ass and join the police department.
What a WEIRDO. A button-pushing, disturbed WEIRDO.
That "good reaction" he got was people smiling weakly and hoping like hell he wouldn't Go Rambo on them. Who, really, is going to "challenge" and give shit to someone packing that much heat?
What a fucking tool. Obtuse, moronic, and self-aggrandizing.
LAGC
(5,330 posts)mike dub
(541 posts)then he might actually have to work within the line of fire
MADem
(135,425 posts)My point wasn't that I wanted him to become a cop; my point was that anyone with altruistic feelings to protect children and other living things (with weapons involved) does so in a societally appropriate way by joining the police force....the old "to protect and serve" paradigm. One doesn't flounce around JC Penny wearing a large weapon like a fashion accessory and convince anyone of anything save "That clown with the gun has ISSUES." At a minimum, he demonstrated his poor judgment for the entire world to see.
Orrin doesn't hang out much at JC Penny
cartels and drug lords? Big Pharma?
This boy (why do they keep calling him a man?) is not a stable human being, and yet he carries...
ex military - at the most 3 years wow that's a lot of service time there not.
No negative vibes - yes, because anyone seeing someone with a couple of guns strapped to them is going to go up to them and say negative things.
This man is like a volunteer firefighter who is an arsonist in his spare time.
I've said it before there is no commonsense - whoever passed this absurd law is out in cuckoo land themselves.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)on one of these posts said they found his old website where he said he was going to go into the marines but it was 3 years old. (the site)
It would seem, they said, that he may be lying about military service or has been discharged early for some reason.
If the site had not been touched in 3 years and 3 years ago he had not yet joined, then if this is actually his site, he is lying or was kicked out. Even the military doesn't want gun nuts.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Then obviously he is an idiot. The original post said the people were concerned.
He needs to get back to mom's basement.
2pooped2pop
(5,420 posts)Did you see the posts about the gun appreciation day? 4, maybe more, people were shot by ignorant discharge, I think it's called, at different rally's.
At one they said the attendees ran and hid as soon as the gun went off.
They ran.
Protect us? I don't think so. Obviously they can't keep their guns from going off. We need protection from them.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,173 posts)"I'm going to walk into a crowded mall, carrying a loaded Glock, and a military style assualt semi-automatic with amunition clips at the ready.....is that ok?"
Seriously? I just don't get your country. That would simply never happen up here (in Canada) Here there would have been about 10 police cars, and a swat team to greet him when he arrived at the mall.
I'd be terrified, especially if I had kids with me. It IS terrorism. I'd be scared to death if I lived in that district. If this "normal" guy can go out buried in weapons like this, so can a deranged Beck-warped individual who also looks normal and the police would just yawn as he walked by. Yikes.
Ed Suspicious
(8,879 posts)such a way that it might point at other people. When this fucking nozzle turns, the business end of that daisy cutter is going to pointed directly at some innocent. What a first class tosser.
Aerows
(39,961 posts)to have served in the military. That's the first thing members of the military are taught.
SouthernDonkey
(256 posts)...and what if this douchebag had "accidentally" discharged his weapon and killed someone? Would he be charged with murder, which he should for doing something so amazingly stupid?? Nope...probably negligent homicide.
This should be against the law!
Robb
(39,665 posts)Let them know they have time to get in front of this story and condemn this idiot.
Edited: better link.
sinkingfeeling
(51,445 posts)mall can prevent fools with guns. I don't know and asked the question somewhere, but didn't get a reply.
PADemD
(4,482 posts)But I sent JC Penney a message anyway.
marions ghost
(19,841 posts)"You go right to the head of the line, yessir...."
"Did you find every all right sir?"
"Thank you for your service to God and JC Penney, SIR!"
"Mighty nice appendage, sir!"
"Yes SIR! Coming right up sir."
"Now you Have a Nice Day, Sir!"
LAGC
(5,330 posts)lpbk2713
(42,753 posts)Someone will see him as a challenge, walk up behind him, poke the barrel of a .22 in his ear and rob him clean.
Hopefully no one will be hurt. But I suspect we'll be reading about it in the news before too long.
rurallib
(62,406 posts)If I was working there I would be at the manager's door right now.
leveymg
(36,418 posts)This sets up all sorts of interesting legal questions. None of which should arise in a sane society, BTW.
watch the sky
(129 posts)can't be good for business, Rambo at JC Penney's <---- NO fan of open carry here.
Initech
(100,063 posts)williamc1967txlib
(25 posts)Honestly, what was that guy thinking? Or was he just out of his mind? Contrary to what some gun nuts think, many people in public places will not be comfortable with someone armed to the teeth like that dude.
u4ic
(17,101 posts)I'm in Canada, so no JC Penney here. If I lived in the US, however, I'd be sending HO a letter stating exactly why I would choose NOT to shop there, and this is it.
ellisonz
(27,711 posts)samsingh
(17,595 posts)cstanleytech
(26,283 posts)after all for almost any reason.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)and people start getting used to seeing it, how long before people get "comfortable" with it and ignoring an actual mass murderer until it is too late? What if it starts encouraging more and more people to do the same- in order to feel "safe" with a bunch of other people wandering around with guns and assault rifles? This could have some messy consequences but, hey, we're human and sometimes I guess it takes multiple needless tragedies before we get our heads screwed on right?
LAGC
(5,330 posts)Open-carry advocates hope to desensitize the public, so that people quit being afraid of guns.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)The problem is that I think that people SHOULD be *afraid* of guns and and even anybody whom owns one should "respect" them enough to recognize the need to be responsible with them as they have the power to snuff out life. In some sense, you could say that when you are carrying around a gun (or any weapon for that matter) you are literally carrying around with you the power of life and death. I don't think that people should be "desensitized" to seeing people anywhere and everywhere toting around guns, assault rifles, etc. I don't view everybody whom owns guns as potential criminals but seeing people openly carry weapons around anywhere and everywhere will make it harder to know when and where there might be an actual potential dangerous person. Just something to think about.............
LAGC
(5,330 posts)If something really did happen, like another gunman opening fire, the police would be confused as to who the shooter was.
Plus, as mentioned above, open-carrying like that only makes you more of a target. Much smarter to carry concealed if you feel you must.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)n/t
mmonk
(52,589 posts)MADem
(135,425 posts)I think that he has problems, too--a need to seek and be the center of attention, even negative attention, a desire to cause a stir for the thrill of upsetting others... and a brutally callous outlook towards his fellow humans.
What a schmuck.
You don't go packing in JC frickin' Penny. You just don't.
Proud Liberal Dem
(24,406 posts)Take your guns to a shooting range, a park (for hunting), or keep them at home IMHO.
BuelahWitch
(9,083 posts)almost 6 years ago.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trolley_Square_shooting
EC
(12,287 posts)and the one that means to use those weapons, just waltzes in and nobody gives any concern because they figure it's another attention freak...asshole.
Gore1FL
(21,127 posts)The people between them are fortunate as well.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)but it seems like they are growing at an exponential rate lately.
FailureToCommunicate
(14,012 posts)Last edited Sat Jan 19, 2013, 11:54 PM - Edit history (1)
(I'm guessing the beret caught the officer's attention...)
we can do it
(12,182 posts)He does not deserve any attention.
ErikJ
(6,335 posts)gulliver
(13,180 posts)"911, how can I help you?"
"Hello, police?"
"Yes, this is 911. Could you speak up, Sir? I can hardy hear you."
"This is Neighborhood Watch Unit Commander Jones. I have a suspect here in the J.C. Penney with an assault rifle."
"Yes, Mr. Jones. I'm the one you spoke with yesterday. Are you sure it isn't a picture of an assault rifle on a T-shirt? Is the man black?"
"Yes, I'm sure. It's a real gun. It's strapped over his shoulder. And he's not black. But it still worries me."
"Ok, Mr. Jones. Whatever you do, don't approach this man."
"Ok. I may ask him some questions."
"No. Don't do that."
"Jones out."
hughee99
(16,113 posts)FlaGranny
(8,361 posts)but how many were scared shitless?
Hubert Flottz
(37,726 posts)and he took his weapon to JC's because he didn't have a sales slip. You'd think his double bitted axe would have been enough though.
mike dub
(541 posts)good one, Hubert Flottz!
Beartracks
(12,809 posts)I wonder if Mr. Whitey McYellowshirt would have been suspicious, just like the regular shoppers were of him?
==================
kpominville
(330 posts)His whole point was he wants people to "relax" around people walking around with weapons.
If people do what he wants they will lower their guard so that when another psycho inevitably does go on another rampage, he can kill even more people.
another_liberal
(8,821 posts)I guess manhood enlargement treatments were not an option?
(sigh)
Tanelorn
(359 posts)The guns then become an accessory or decoration. Maybe it was a bit of performance art.
Smilo
(1,944 posts)just what is the point of carrying if the gun is empty? "Hey look at me, I have a small dick, but I can carry my large gun to compensate."
And what would happen if he was actually challenged - say someone called the cops and they came up on him and told him to put down his weapon and get down on the ground (may be legal, may be empty), but who in a crowded mall is going to take the chance?
snort
(2,334 posts)triplepoint
(431 posts).
.
.
.
.
.
.
lexw
(804 posts)If I were to walk into a JC Penney's store with my dog, security would be all over me; but the store is okay with a freak walking around strapped with deadly weapons?
AsahinaKimi
(20,776 posts)Sore wa orokana amerikahito kara de sunappu!!
harmonicon
(12,008 posts)private businesses don't have to put up with that shit.
blackspade
(10,056 posts)And let everyone around me know why.
"There is some crazy guy in the store with loaded guns and extra ammo!"
No one has any idea if this guy is about to shoot or not. Maybe he is about to rob the place.
There is absolutely no reason to do this unless you are batshit crazy. There is nothing to hunt in a JCP.
1Greensix
(111 posts)This guy told the police he was taking an assault rifle into a mall and no one did anything. Does that then set a precedent? So, the next mass murderer can call the police and say he is taking three unloaded assault rifles, a couple of shotguns and a couple of handguns into a mall and they won't do anything until he has loaded them (a couple of seconds) and opened fire. THEN the police will get to deal with another nut, armed to the teeth, in a mall, and killing innocent people. The NRA will Immediately begin a campaign for more guns in malls, to stop the shooter, they supported, up until he pulled the trigger. It goes on and on with these people. The true gun nut is a racist asshole, hoping to die a hero, while defending friends, family, or self from the Dark Hordes that exist in his imagination. Insanely racist and armed. What could go wrong?
smirkymonkey
(63,221 posts)I will never, ever date a gun owner.
Abbraxus
(18 posts)Thousands upon thousands of times every day our 4th amendment right is violated at airports by government agents. Where is the public outcry for this violation?
lonestarnot
(77,097 posts)april
(1,148 posts)ajk2821
(89 posts)1. Well we now know who has the smallest pecker in Utah.
2. Good thing this guy was not in Florida or someone could have shot him first and totally justified it under the stand your ground law. If Skittles and a drink get you shot, what does openly carrying weapons get you?
iamthebandfanman
(8,127 posts)who is crazy and who is just exercising their rights?
say you dismiss someone with a gun as the later,
only to find out moments later.. ope.. it was the first
thats my problem with open carry :p
it would have been hard for me not to have been like *cough pussy cough*
spedtr90
(719 posts)the next shooter can stroll in with his weapon and casually wait for the best moment for the highest body count, or a small number of terrorists could easily take their places and coordinate something horrible.
This is insane.
Dark n Stormy Knight
(9,760 posts)And, generally, what part of "Well regulated militia" don't people understand?
bowens43
(16,064 posts)stupid f*ckers.... what is wrong with gun lovers?
cherish44
(2,566 posts)If he needs that, then he obviously can't shoot worth a damn. This gun needs shooting lessons more than he needs an assault rifle. I could probably do more damage with a Red Ryder BB gun than these assault weapons "can't aim" wimps could to with their whole arsenal. Me: one bullet, one shot is all I need because I'm an expert marksman...etc
BearCorn
(3 posts)He must have received death threats. That is self defense.
bossy22
(3,547 posts)It's one thing to carry a pistol for self defense, but this is just frightening people for no good reason