Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Atman

(31,464 posts)
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:31 PM Jan 2013

Take a Xanax or pour a cocktail, relax, and get ready for some jaw-dropping stupidity...



AMERICAN PATRIOT
Do you agree or disagree with Linn County Sheriff Tim Mueller's stance in his letter to Vice President Joe Biden -- that neither he nor his deputies will help federal agents take firearms away from law-abiding citizens? "It is the position of this sheriff," he said in the letter," that I refuse to participate, or stand idly by, while my citizens are turned into criminals due to the unconstitutional actions of misguided politicians." http://bit.ly/VlN4m4


10,151 likes and 2,937 shares on FB so far. Of course, the nutters think the Sheriff would be upholding the law by breaking a law which no one is proposing anyway.
82 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Take a Xanax or pour a cocktail, relax, and get ready for some jaw-dropping stupidity... (Original Post) Atman Jan 2013 OP
"My citizens"...twice....in one letter. Douchebag, with other hand on his "precious" nt pkdu Jan 2013 #1
Instead, I'll go 'pour' myself a gatoraide madokie Jan 2013 #2
would have been classier to have left out the (')s leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #6
Oh well...typing fast without proofing. Atman Jan 2013 #13
happens to me too - that's why i dont correct people on their typing- and when people do, i think leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #30
the sheriff is not breaking any laws. the feds cannot order the states to enforce fed laws leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #3
VP Biden letter to Sheriff southernyankeebelle Jan 2013 #8
If His Deputies, Sir, Do Not 'Stand Idly By' While Federal Agents Enforce Federal Law The Magistrate Jan 2013 #11
yea i misread that as "they WILL stand idly by" yea if they interfer then off to the pokey he'll go leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #24
They Neither Need Nor Want To, Sir: No Local Authority Enforces Federal Law The Magistrate Jan 2013 #32
er, ok. galileoreloaded Jan 2013 #81
Brother, the Confederacy is about as dead as your Shift key. nt wtmusic Jan 2013 #16
when ee cummings died he will'd his computer to me leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #26
I have noticed that DUers with names that include kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #34
I've noticed that too womanofthehills Jan 2013 #39
That one has 2 terms for good measure. FSogol Jan 2013 #42
For the love of all that is decent genxlib Jan 2013 #47
I hope I'm not included. LeftofObama Jan 2013 #48
"LeftY" is the giveaway. It's namecalling by RWers against liberals. kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #56
Always? I don't think tht's true. It's just that we notice it more because of the irony. Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2013 #51
Ok. Not precisely 100% of the time. But often enough for many of us to notice it. kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #57
I know what you meant, but you didn't respond to my suggestion that it seems like it happens a lot Dark n Stormy Knight Jan 2013 #60
and sometimes a cigar is just a cigar - no shame in being wrong though. leftyohiolib Jan 2013 #82
sounds familiar to patriot talking points. hopemountain Jan 2013 #54
Um....no. They can write a law that requires states to implement it jeff47 Jan 2013 #69
Bet that Sheriff loves busting pot smokers though! Duer 157099 Jan 2013 #4
a poor mis-guided sheriff Angry Dragon Jan 2013 #5
the sad part: he is not alone hopemountain Jan 2013 #52
What is HIS legal definition of "law-abiding"? Rather a loose contract, isn't it? Who defines its patrice Jan 2013 #7
Yep, if you park illegally are you no longer law abiding? SWTORFanatic Jan 2013 #59
I mean, I can understand these concerns, but if it were me, I'd want to spell it out LEGALLY very patrice Jan 2013 #61
It's essentially a code word. Law abiding = mostly law abiding white male SWTORFanatic Jan 2013 #65
Oh yes! I hadn't thought of that, but it fits profiling very tightly doesn't it. nt patrice Jan 2013 #76
Would this Sheriff or others like him feel the same way if R. Daneel Olivaw Jan 2013 #9
Yes, and many police organizations support gun limitations. Of course sheriffs are elected so okaawhatever Jan 2013 #19
I've had poor cocktails rusty fender Jan 2013 #10
LOL! I deserved that one! Atman Jan 2013 #15
This message was self-deleted by its author quinnox Jan 2013 #12
The Ugly, Unhinged Spirit Of Bull Connor Lives On. (nt) Paladin Jan 2013 #14
Pure strawman bullshit Still Sensible Jan 2013 #17
Strawman of what? wtmusic Jan 2013 #20
The sheriff puts out a straw man letter Still Sensible Jan 2013 #44
Sheriff Gun Nutter isn't a straw man. He's a real flesh and blood man. kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #35
This message was self-deleted by its author Warren DeMontague Jan 2013 #66
I wonder the assholes position if he is confronted by a perp with an bushmaster still_one Jan 2013 #18
or better yet, not confronted but shot from far away. The Barrett 50 cal sniper rifle has a 1 mile okaawhatever Jan 2013 #21
If you have $2,000-$10,000 to spare, you too can purchase a .50 cal rifle!.... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #27
and if you order now we'll throw in this set of ginsu knives......lolz nt okaawhatever Jan 2013 #58
Wow. Taking a stand against a law that doesn't even exist? What an idiot.... OldDem2012 Jan 2013 #22
At this time Old Codger Jan 2013 #23
Linn County Oregon, future NON recipient of federal funding in any form........ wandy Jan 2013 #25
Hey you gave me a great idea. Stop all USPS activity kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #37
Not only USPS employees ...... wandy Jan 2013 #46
Guys like Lyndon Johnson... bless (and damn) his hide... Bigmack Jan 2013 #50
Correct me if I am wrong bluestateguy Jan 2013 #28
there's probably not going to be much taking of guns anyway 2pooped2pop Jan 2013 #29
What do you think about sheriffs where pot is legal who refuse to help the DEA? (nt) Recursion Jan 2013 #31
Nobody commits mass murders with pot. kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #38
Yes but on the surface it seems like a fair point. Warren Stupidity Jan 2013 #41
So sheriffs should enforce laws you agree with Recursion Jan 2013 #49
So no drug dealers... bobclark86 Jan 2013 #63
Orville Faubus decided the hell with the Feds too. lpbk2713 Jan 2013 #33
Unfit for office. n/t RKP5637 Jan 2013 #36
His letter is based on a false reality Marrah_G Jan 2013 #40
I live in Torrance Country, NM - same wording womanofthehills Jan 2013 #43
And, we know that "law abiding" citizens don't kill other citizens...except when they do. Tierra_y_Libertad Jan 2013 #45
I wonder who typed it up for him? Rex Jan 2013 #53
ridiculous samsingh Jan 2013 #55
Check out the responses in the link. As far as I can tell, many are positive about Squinch Jan 2013 #62
Almost all positive responses Atman Jan 2013 #64
And he's such a weasel! All he's saying in the letter is that he won't enforce unconstitutional Squinch Jan 2013 #68
Uhhhhhmerica is a BIG place datasuspect Jan 2013 #78
And watch these same guys fall all over themselves to enforce federal law if OR legalizes pot. Warren DeMontague Jan 2013 #67
from the comments farminator3000 Jan 2013 #70
Oh, drat! I have to drive through Linn County on my way to Western Oregon. classof56 Jan 2013 #71
I agree... nor however, can he stop federal agents form coming to do his job for him. nt. OneTenthofOnePercent Jan 2013 #72
I didn't realize the sheriff was a constitutional scholar. n/t BeeBee Jan 2013 #73
Well, let's see how that works out for him n/t Shankapotomus Jan 2013 #74
I'm not too worried about it jmowreader Jan 2013 #75
Lets do the same thing with pot! Don't enforce the federal law mister police person. Lint Head Jan 2013 #77
looks like a whole lot of words just to say fuck you. bubbayugga Jan 2013 #79
He looks a bit like Gary Busey. Snarkoleptic Jan 2013 #80
 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
30. happens to me too - that's why i dont correct people on their typing- and when people do, i think
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:17 PM
Jan 2013

it's classier to not point it out - like the poster did with the apostrophes. that post was to THAT poster not you

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
3. the sheriff is not breaking any laws. the feds cannot order the states to enforce fed laws
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:41 PM
Jan 2013

the feds will need to use feds to enforce federal law they cant tell the states to do it

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
8. VP Biden letter to Sheriff
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:45 PM
Jan 2013

Forgetaboutit. When the time comes we will bring our Army with the big guns to take care of the situation. Thank you for informing us.

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
11. If His Deputies, Sir, Do Not 'Stand Idly By' While Federal Agents Enforce Federal Law
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:48 PM
Jan 2013

They will spend long terms in Federal custody.

 

leftyohiolib

(5,917 posts)
24. yea i misread that as "they WILL stand idly by" yea if they interfer then off to the pokey he'll go
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jan 2013

but my point which is that the feds cant make him enforce federal law is still valid.

The Magistrate

(95,244 posts)
32. They Neither Need Nor Want To, Sir: No Local Authority Enforces Federal Law
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:20 PM
Jan 2013

If a thing is against both state and Federal law, a local authority may arrest someone, and later turn them over to the Federals, but that is a different thing than a local officer enforcing a Federal law.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
34. I have noticed that DUers with names that include
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:26 PM
Jan 2013

"lefty" or "lib" always seem to turn out to be supporters of the RW, and in your case gun nutters.

Curious, that.

FSogol

(45,465 posts)
42. That one has 2 terms for good measure.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:51 PM
Jan 2013

I look forward to seeing the troll that has 3 terms in his name. It'll be something like:

LeftySouthpawLib or DemLiberalUtahLefty

genxlib

(5,524 posts)
47. For the love of all that is decent
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 06:24 PM
Jan 2013

Please don't include me in that broad brush. The gun nutters (and RW as a whole) can bite me.

Dark n Stormy Knight

(9,760 posts)
60. I know what you meant, but you didn't respond to my suggestion that it seems like it happens a lot
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:17 PM
Jan 2013

because we notice the name more when it strikes us a ironic. I bet more DUers with lib, lefty, etc in thier screen names do not post RW crap.

I do think, however, that there are too many RW-crap-schilling posts on DU, regardless of the screen names.

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
69. Um....no. They can write a law that requires states to implement it
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 09:08 PM
Jan 2013

For examples, you might wanna take a gander at the interstate highway system. Or consider Medicaid.

Do you think the state DoTs or Health Departments aren't the ones implementing those Federal programs?

hopemountain

(3,919 posts)
52. the sad part: he is not alone
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 07:06 PM
Jan 2013

some of the oregon sheriffs are organized and part of a patriot militia. the one northern oregon county sheriff who has refused to send a similar letter is being heavily attacked. katu.com

patrice

(47,992 posts)
7. What is HIS legal definition of "law-abiding"? Rather a loose contract, isn't it? Who defines its
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:45 PM
Jan 2013

terms? Was he elected to do that?

Prediction: Mueller is politically ambitious and will run for higher office next.

patrice

(47,992 posts)
61. I mean, I can understand these concerns, but if it were me, I'd want to spell it out LEGALLY very
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:35 PM
Jan 2013

precisely, so that I would not find myself in the position of defending, or at least not fulfilling one's duty toward, someone(s) whom I ought not be assuming that relationship to them in that particular situation in that particular manner.

It's a little like being a classroom teacher, if you're too ambiguous you're going to get used and the essential reason may be that you are trying to be buddies with people that don't need you for their buddy and in regards to whom others in your classroom/community have needs that you are violating in favor of those you have chosen, for whatever reason, to mitigate the rules for.

If someone does this, they should consider spelling it out very precisely legally, so as not to create false expectations on any side in the issue, but, then, I suppose that IS the point, so, if something bad happens, one can always say "That's not what I meant, so it's not my fault that they misunderstood my intentions." That's the classic RepubliKlan tool known as Plausible Deniability.

This guy is playing his county for a sucker. Whatever happens is what he says it is & that's bulllshit, because it's not what he was hired to do. He is not judge and jury. My bet is that he's an ambitious manipulative demagogue who will pull the rug out from under whomever serves his objectives.

 

R. Daneel Olivaw

(12,606 posts)
9. Would this Sheriff or others like him feel the same way if
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:47 PM
Jan 2013

Last edited Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:33 PM - Edit history (1)

instead of crazed gunmen killing theater goers and young school children they were gunning down scores of police, republicans and their supporters?

It is seemingly only the innocent which have to die at the hands of bastards with assault rifles (weapons of mass destruction) and the right wing continue to duck their moral (yeah, I know...they don't have any) responsibility by admitting that they have created this problem: the proliferation of weapons never imagined by the writers of the second amendment.

BTW: I am in now way advocating for the injury or deaths of any sheriff, police officer, republicans or their followers, and it was only to illustrate a point.

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
19. Yes, and many police organizations support gun limitations. Of course sheriffs are elected so
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:57 PM
Jan 2013

they're acting more like politicians with this. When they changed laws in Florida to allow guns on college campuses and other public places, all the police chiefs opposed it. All in the entire state. This moron is giving the impression leo's oppose gun control measures, which isn't true.

Response to Atman (Original post)

Still Sensible

(2,870 posts)
17. Pure strawman bullshit
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:52 PM
Jan 2013

frankly law enforcement in general seems rather in favor of some common sense gun regulations.

Unfortunately, there are squeaky wheel exceptions--seems like these tend to be sheriffs that typically must stand for reelection ergo the RW claptrap--and they're getting plenty of coverage.

wtmusic

(39,166 posts)
20. Strawman of what?
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:57 PM
Jan 2013

OP hasn't made any point this is supposed to support, and the article speaks for itself.

You're perfect entitled to post some counter-examples.

Still Sensible

(2,870 posts)
44. The sheriff puts out a straw man letter
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 05:00 PM
Jan 2013

refusing to enforce laws that dont even exist! Typical right wing--make up shit and be righteously outraged about the untrue shit they make up.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
35. Sheriff Gun Nutter isn't a straw man. He's a real flesh and blood man.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:28 PM
Jan 2013

With lunacy in his soul and blackness in his heart, just like all gun nutters.

Response to Still Sensible (Reply #17)

still_one

(92,110 posts)
18. I wonder the assholes position if he is confronted by a perp with an bushmaster
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 03:56 PM
Jan 2013

Based on the msm one would believe Americans love their guns more than anything else, good "Christian" americans

okaawhatever

(9,461 posts)
21. or better yet, not confronted but shot from far away. The Barrett 50 cal sniper rifle has a 1 mile
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:00 PM
Jan 2013

range and is legal for private purchase in 49 states. WTG NRA

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
22. Wow. Taking a stand against a law that doesn't even exist? What an idiot....
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:02 PM
Jan 2013

...His letter is pure political grandstanding....throwing raw meat to the True Believers.

 

Old Codger

(4,205 posts)
23. At this time
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:02 PM
Jan 2013

There have been no ideas set forth by anyone other than some here to take existing guns away from law abiding people anywhere. Our sheriff here in Douglas county Oregon made that same statement....Even with the Assault Weapons Ban they never made any attempts to take anyones guns away any existing guns and magazines were "grandfathered" in.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
25. Linn County Oregon, future NON recipient of federal funding in any form........
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:08 PM
Jan 2013

They don't need no stinken inter state highways. They don't need no stinken post office. They gots their freedumb.
Good to see the right wing is doing something creative about the deficit.

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
37. Hey you gave me a great idea. Stop all USPS activity
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:31 PM
Jan 2013

in any county that refuses to obey federal gun laws - for the safety of postal workers, obviously!

Close all their post offices, cease all deliveries and pickups at the county line. Make them all travel to the next county for mail pickup and delivery.

wandy

(3,539 posts)
46. Not only USPS employees ......
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 06:02 PM
Jan 2013

Interstate Highway workers, FAA workers, Agricultural assistance to local farms, anything that requires federal tax dollars.
Sane firearm regulations can be achieved in the same way speed limit regulations were achieved.
We just have to sit down and talk about it like adults.
I see no point in my tax dollars supporting some local "top dog's" temper tantrum.

 

Bigmack

(8,020 posts)
50. Guys like Lyndon Johnson... bless (and damn) his hide...
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 06:51 PM
Jan 2013

.. would have shown guys like this not to fuck with the "feddle gummint".

He knows he's safe... so he's just rousing the rabble.

Now, if Federal Marshalls showed up and clapped him in irons for threatening federal officials in the performance of their duties.... perpwalk, stripsearch, crossbar hotel, orange jumpsuit.....

Damn, aren't fantasies fun!

bluestateguy

(44,173 posts)
28. Correct me if I am wrong
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:14 PM
Jan 2013

But the assault weapon ban grandfathers in existing owners. And persons with felony convictions cannot have guns anyway (making them not-law abiding anyway). So his letter is just a lot of chest thumping and smoke blowing.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
29. there's probably not going to be much taking of guns anyway
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:16 PM
Jan 2013

So this guy will get to look like he's the man that stood up to Obama. When actually he will not be called on to take away any of his law abiding citizen's guns.

An obvious Fox news watcher which means an uninformed, misguided, and perhaps ignorant man. We should question his suitability for his job.

lpbk2713

(42,750 posts)
33. Orville Faubus decided the hell with the Feds too.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:24 PM
Jan 2013



Eisenhower and the 101st Airborne soon convinced him that was a really bad move.


Marrah_G

(28,581 posts)
40. His letter is based on a false reality
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 04:38 PM
Jan 2013

No one is coming after his citizens to take away their guns except in his paranoid, delusional mind.

 

Rex

(65,616 posts)
53. I wonder who typed it up for him?
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 07:08 PM
Jan 2013

Wow, he can hold a paper in front of a camera...well ain't he smart!!!!

Squinch

(50,934 posts)
62. Check out the responses in the link. As far as I can tell, many are positive about
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:46 PM
Jan 2013

the sheriff's actions, but it's hard to say. The spelling and composition mostly amount to "ug ug ug. My rites. ug ug ug. Ouch. My knuckles are bleeding."

There is a lot of discussion of rites. Maybe they are religious.

I am guessing a cannibalistic cult of previously undetected bigfoots living in the Catskills. With computers.

Atman

(31,464 posts)
64. Almost all positive responses
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 08:55 PM
Jan 2013

The Tea Baggers think he's a hero protecting us from the Communist Socialist Fascist Constitution-shredding America-hating gun grabber.

Squinch

(50,934 posts)
68. And he's such a weasel! All he's saying in the letter is that he won't enforce unconstitutional
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 09:01 PM
Jan 2013

regulations. Which no one is asking him to do.

I think I'll write to Joe Biden and tell him I'm not going to spray paint Air Force One. AND I'm not going to bring a horse to church in Massachusetts. Because, goddammit. My rites.

Warren DeMontague

(80,708 posts)
67. And watch these same guys fall all over themselves to enforce federal law if OR legalizes pot.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 09:01 PM
Jan 2013

"But we HAVE to!!!!!!!!!!"

farminator3000

(2,117 posts)
70. from the comments
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 09:13 PM
Jan 2013

Thank you Sheriff! I live in SC, and I am sure our entire state will take the same attitude and refuse an unconstitutional orders, no matter whom it comes from. My hate is off to you Sheriff, well stated and clear.

classof56

(5,376 posts)
71. Oh, drat! I have to drive through Linn County on my way to Western Oregon.
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 09:17 PM
Jan 2013

Also, Crook County north of me, where their sheriff has made the same idiotic declaration 'bout what he's gonna do to protect all the law-abidin' morans who are madly in love with their guns. Guess I'd better remove the "Obama/Biden" bumper stickers from my car. Sigh...times like this make me sad to be an Oregonian. Sheriff Mueller's kinda cute, though--wonder how he feels about arresting gray-haired grannies who don't pack. Maybe I'll test it out, next time I have a hankerin' to visit the Oregon coast. Would be fun, wiping that smirk off his face!



jmowreader

(50,546 posts)
75. I'm not too worried about it
Sun Jan 20, 2013, 09:44 PM
Jan 2013

When The Evil Unconstitutional Federal Gummint comes in to deprive Linn County of its constitutional rights, the first thing it's going to do is send platoons of soldiers in to arrest the sheriff and his minions for Obstructing Federal Officers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Take a Xanax or pour a co...