Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo why were there red coats in the troops?
Weren't they on the other side?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 1000 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (0)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
So why were there red coats in the troops? (Original Post)
dsc
Jan 2013
OP
Squinch
(50,916 posts)1. Yes, but they felt bad about it.
WolverineDG
(22,298 posts)2. Colonial troups
My guess from Virginia.
Behind them marched the Minutemen in blue.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)3. Music wore reverse colors in the Revolutionary War..
so they could be identified.
ellie
(6,928 posts)4. According to NBC,
they were the president's personal guard. They wear the traditional uniform from when Washington was president. That Brian Williams, he is filled with information!
dsc
(52,152 posts)5. ah didn't know that
Have to say that could have been rather dangerous if the British were sneakier.
DavidDvorkin
(19,468 posts)6. The were there to represent Queen Elizabeth
to whom Obama reports.
I think I read that somewhere on the Web.