Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sasha031

(6,700 posts)
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 03:01 AM Jan 2013

How Texas Inflicts Bad Textbooks on Us

“What happens in Texas doesn't stay in Texas when it comes to textbooks”

No matter where you live, if your children go to public schools, the textbooks they use were very possibly written under Texas influence. If they graduated with a reflexive suspicion of the concept of separation of church and state and an unexpected interest in the contributions of the National Rifle Association to American history, you know who to blame.

When it comes to meddling with school textbooks, Texas is both similar to other states and totally different. It’s hardly the only one that likes to fiddle around with the material its kids study in class. The difference is due to size—4.8 million textbook-reading schoolchildren as of 2011—and the peculiarities of its system of government, in which the State Board of Education is selected in elections that are practically devoid of voters, and wealthy donors can chip in unlimited amounts of money to help their favorites win.

Those favorites are not shrinking violets. In 2009, the nation watched in awe as the state board worked on approving a new science curriculum under the leadership of a chair who believed that “evolution is hooey.” In 2010, the subject was social studies and the teachers tasked with drawing up course guidelines were supposed to work in consultation with “experts” added on by the board, one of whom believed that the income tax was contrary to the word of God in the scriptures.
http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2012/jun/21/how-texas-inflicts-bad-textbooks-on-us/?pagination=false

14 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

longship

(40,416 posts)
1. And it is worse than that.
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 03:38 AM
Jan 2013

In the history standards, under McElroy, Texas expunged Thomas Jefferson from the enlightenment influence standards. He added that well known enlightenment figure, Thomas Aquinas (13th century!).

These people are fucking nuts.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
2. The largest reason isn't in the OP
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 03:45 AM
Jan 2013

Texas is the only state that approves textbooks at the state level. The other 49 states give local school boards a modicum of control...but in Texas, if the state school board doesn't approve a book schools can't buy it.

Add to that the economics of printing, which state that it makes no fiscal sense to print a Texas Edition and a Rest of America Edition of a book (because there ain't a hell of a lot of money in the textbook business, and they're huge), and you wind up with one book--the one Texas likes.

Now, there may be salvation ahead: since a PDF version of a textbook incurs no expense after the designer is done with it, it is very possible that a non-Texas e-book version of a text could be created, if they can come up with a good DRM that keeps teachers from passing PDFs around online.

sasha031

(6,700 posts)
4. I was reading the comments of a woman who seems to know what she talking about
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 03:51 AM
Jan 2013

She says that Texas makes writes & publishes the textbooks for the country.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
9. Not quite, but almost
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 02:02 PM
Jan 2013

They rely on private companies for those things, but they prescribe what will be in the books.

This is not all that far off topic, but you know how the RWNJs like to scream about national standards in education? There are national standards, and almost all of them are set by fifteen people in Texas who are really pissed the feds won't let them put Bible passages in English books.

Tunkamerica

(4,444 posts)
8. Kind of off-topic, but it's why NC
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 06:10 AM
Jan 2013

couldn't have any beer over 6% alcohol till a few years ago. It wasn't illegal, but it had to be labelled malt liquor if it had over 6% alcohol. No beer companies would print separate labels for NC so we couldn't get it.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
10. NC's liquor regulations have always been a joke
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 02:18 PM
Jan 2013

At least as late as 2009 - it's probably still there but that's the last time I was down this road - there was a non-self-service ABC store in Robeson County. You went to a counter and told the clerk what you wanted.

And in case you ever wondered why all ABC stores looked alike for so long...there used to be a wall blocking view of the walkway into the store. It was called a preacher wall because it was supposed to keep your preacher from seeing you buying liquor.

Now to the other side of the country: Idaho has state liquor stores. They are self supporting and turn their profits over to the state, but every time we run an article about the liquor control board we get six letters demanding privatization because they don't want their money spent buying liquor. If Carrie Nation were alive today she'd live in Idaho...she and Billy Sunday and the rest of the Women's Christian Temperance Union.

jmowreader

(50,553 posts)
11. Oh boy
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 02:35 PM
Jan 2013

It's not a contract thing.

In most states schoolbooks are chosen by school districts, and the state just provides some money.

In Texas, the state board of education makes a list of approved texts. If the religious fanatics on the board, who are there because almost no one votes that line on the ballot and Pat Robertson decided seizing control of school boards was critical in his goal of Christianizing America, decide to put this line:

Condoms are not effective in the prevention of disease nor do they stop unintended pregnancy.

in health books, because you can't print a Texas edition and a non-Texas edition of a textbook every kid in America will be taught rubbers don't work. Within a year's time we'd have maternity cheerleading uniforms because no young man in his right mind would endure the embarrassment of buying rubbers, the logistics of hiding them from his parents or the loss of spontaniety and sensation that comes from wearing them during sex if they don't even work.

modrepub

(3,494 posts)
7. My school district
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 05:52 AM
Jan 2013

can't afford to update their books all that often so not sure how much influence this will have. Going to e-books may give us more solutions to this predicament. It's really up to my kids teachers and local school board what my kids are taught and that will always change once they get out of school.

ck4829

(35,045 posts)
13. I remember some professors and teachers who never used books, used PowerPoint instead
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 02:46 PM
Jan 2013

That could work, along with printing out the presentation for everyone.

It just seems so surreal, yes you can change it once they get out of school, but having to say "You're right lil' Timmy, people DIDN'T ride dinosaurs to work even though your Texas made schoolbook includes it" seems so wrong on so many levels.

PoliticalBiker

(328 posts)
14. Now that we have identified the problem...
Tue Jan 22, 2013, 05:04 PM
Jan 2013

... how do we, as a nation, fix it?

If I'm reading this information correctly, Texass somehow manages to influence/determine/print textbooks for the rest of the country.
How does this happen? How does the Dept. of Education, in Washington DC, approve distribution of Texass textbooks on a national level?
My experience is that different schools have different books for the same or similar classes. I would be unreasonable for every teacher to be told to use the same book all over the country for 6th grade history or 8th grade economics.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»How Texas Inflicts Bad Te...