Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRight-wing terrorism is real - By David Sirota
Backlash to a new West Point study on domestic extremism exposes the depths of conservatives' denial
BY DAVID SIROTA
There are four revealing stories to be gleaned from the Aggrieved Conservative Backlash to an exhaustive and sober new West Point Combatting Terrorism Center report on Understanding Americas Violent Far-Right. (For a more grassroots-y look at how hysterical and viral that backlash is, see some choice tweets here: https://twitter.com/search/realtime?q=west+point+right+terrorist&src=typd).
First, there is the obvious lesson about double standards. When the government accuses a Muslim group of being a national security threat, conservatives are quick to applaud and demand immediate (often violent) action, without regard for the whole innocent until proven guilty stuff. By contrast, when the government accuses an ideologically right-wing group of being a similarly dangerous threat, many of the same conservatives suddenly play the victim card, insisting that the Big Bad Government is wrongly demonizing them.
Second, the backlash tells the story of how priorities abruptly change when the context shifts. Again, when the government accuses a Muslim group of posing a threat, the substance of the accusations (how much of a threat? what is the operational capacity of the threat? etc.) are typically received by conservatives as serious national security issues. But when far right groups are labeled a threat, many conservatives first reflex is to defend the accused and wholly ignore the substance of the accusations no matter how well documented those accusations are (and say what you will about the West Point reports conclusions, its supporting evidence is most certainly well-documented).
This spotlights the third storyline that of the double standard that governs what is, and is not, considered an acceptable rhetorical response to a purported national security threat. In the reaction to the West Point report, many conservatives seem to be arguing that that the government is unduly targeting the anti-government/allegedly pro-freedom agenda that they share with far-right extremist groups. This move to first and foremost defend the common ideology is apparently seen as A-OK. But ask yourself: how would liberals be received if, upon publication of a report about Islamic terrorism, their reaction was first and foremost to publicly defend, say, the anti-imperialist sentiment of the accused terrorists? Such a reaction probably would get those liberals accused of giving aid and comfort to said terrorists and therefore being traitors to country.
-snip-
http://www.salon.com/2013/01/22/right_wing_terrorism_is_real/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 824 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Right-wing terrorism is real - By David Sirota (Original Post)
DonViejo
Jan 2013
OP
patrice
(47,992 posts)1. K&R for how what calls itself "the Left" should evaluate its position in all of this. nt
patrice
(47,992 posts)2. This is how Plausible Deniability is created:
However, it is to argue that in light of all the aforementioned reasons why the school should look at right-wing terrorism, those who suggest that it nonetheless shouldnt are effectively asking Americas premiere military academy to succumb to a form of political correctness. Regularly championed by conservatives, this particularly pernicious strain of political correctness says we somehow cant talk about (or in this case, even study) anything that offends the political ideology of the conservative movement.