Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Fresh_Start

(11,330 posts)
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:28 PM Jan 2013

Anyone who receives public funds should be drug tested....

if poor people are required to be drug tested to receive the pittance called welfare, than public officials who receive more than a pittance and are able to direct public funds should be drug tested as an even higher priority: each pay period would be approrpriate commensurate with the amount of money they are receiving from the public.

Another state is looking to make drug testing a condition of welfare...which is what led to this rant

15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Anyone who receives public funds should be drug tested.... (Original Post) Fresh_Start Jan 2013 OP
The president of Exxon should be tested and... JoeBlowToo Jan 2013 #1
Surely that would not be adequate. surrealAmerican Jan 2013 #5
ALL flobee1 Jan 2013 #8
I would bet the employees are already tested BuelahWitch Jan 2013 #14
Good, then all of congress should be drug tested IMO. n/t RKP5637 Jan 2013 #2
That won't go over well in Congress. longship Jan 2013 #3
Contractors too! KT2000 Jan 2013 #4
Contractors are already piss tested Lesmoderesstupides Jan 2013 #12
what I mean is when the government KT2000 Jan 2013 #13
Doctors, lawyers, journalists, anyone who handles money or is a manager, anyone who makes any kind Brickbat Jan 2013 #6
How about, we don't test anybody? surrealAmerican Jan 2013 #7
They're working on that. They want all entitlement programs ended and kestrel91316 Jan 2013 #9
If they handle public funds, they should have to be tested for an IQ dixiegrrrrl Jan 2013 #10
Because we have so much money to fund that testing. nt LWolf Jan 2013 #11
These people had the right idea DogPawsBiscuitsNGrav Jan 2013 #15
 

JoeBlowToo

(253 posts)
1. The president of Exxon should be tested and...
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:36 PM
Jan 2013

Boening, Dyncorp. Lockheed Martin, Kellog Brown & Root, GE, Microsoft, Apple, and many more!

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
5. Surely that would not be adequate.
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:56 PM
Jan 2013

Would you also need to test the board of directors? ... the CEO? the CFO?
... all the executives?
... all the employees?
... all the stockholders?


What does it mean to "drug test" a corporation, anyway?

longship

(40,416 posts)
3. That won't go over well in Congress.
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:37 PM
Jan 2013

After all, they are paid with public funds.

If I have to piss in a cup to receive SocSec, which I paid into for decades, the can do it, too.

I'm all in on this hand.

 

Lesmoderesstupides

(156 posts)
12. Contractors are already piss tested
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 08:46 PM
Jan 2013

it is a condition of employment and you can be tested at any time.

KT2000

(20,572 posts)
13. what I mean is when the government
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 08:56 PM
Jan 2013

outsources jobs to private contractors. An example of this is that Federal employee records are now maintained by private companies - Northrup Grumman (sp?) for one.
All kinds of processes that were once done by government employees (state and federal) are now being done by private contractors. IT is a big one for that.

I know people who have done this and they have not been tested.

Brickbat

(19,339 posts)
6. Doctors, lawyers, journalists, anyone who handles money or is a manager, anyone who makes any kind
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:57 PM
Jan 2013

of decision, pastors, advertising representatives, anyone who deals with the public, anyone in a service or manufacturing job...it just makes sense!

surrealAmerican

(11,360 posts)
7. How about, we don't test anybody?
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 07:59 PM
Jan 2013

Why can't need alone define who gets welfare? Why do we have to just let people starve to death if they aren't "worthy"?

 

kestrel91316

(51,666 posts)
9. They're working on that. They want all entitlement programs ended and
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 08:36 PM
Jan 2013

the poor, elderly, and disabled completely dependent on private charity.

Private charity, of course, is completely free to pick and choose who they wish to help and who they don't. I'm sure you can see whare this is leading.

The unworthy will simply starve, just like back in the good old days.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
10. If they handle public funds, they should have to be tested for an IQ
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 08:44 PM
Jan 2013

higher than the thermometer in July.
Jus saying.......

 
15. These people had the right idea
Fri Jan 25, 2013, 09:25 PM
Jan 2013
This week, while Georgia ranks dead last in the nation for job growth, legislators ignored bills that would bring jobs to Georgia and instead, targeted people who’ve lost their jobs. Both chambers passed bills requiring parents seeking temporary public assistance to submit to urine drug screens. While lawmakers are busy creating a drug screen for Georgia’s poorest families, they have ignored two groups that receive and control a bigger share of government money: corporate executives and elected officials.

A recent survey by the nonpartisan, nonprofit Better Georgia shows that Georgians’ more heavily favor drug tests for elected officials and CEO’s of corporations that profit from tax dollars than for recipients of unemployment benefits and “welfare.” The survey of 806 registered Georgia voters has a 3.5% margin of error and showed:

* 79 % support drug testing elected officials and senior appointed officials
* 66% support drug testing CEO’s of corporations that get tax credits or government contracts
* 64% support drug testing welfare recipients and unemployment recipient


http://www.politicususa.com/georgia-drug-testing.html
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Anyone who receives publi...