Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
19 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Here’s something for the tax-paying ‘Mericans to keep in mind when sequestration hits in 32 days (Original Post) kpete Jan 2013 OP
Send that to everyone you know who complains about welfare queens liberal N proud Jan 2013 #1
I'm confused bigapple1963 Jan 2013 #2
This article may help Ashy Larry Jan 2013 #3
I weep for poor, poor Exxon Wednesdays Jan 2013 #4
Not only do they not pay federal taxes, they get large subsidies. (nt) jeff47 Jan 2013 #7
wow bigapple1963 Jan 2013 #8
Never heard of oil subsidies, huh? (nt) jeff47 Jan 2013 #9
are these bigapple1963 Jan 2013 #14
They're both. jeff47 Jan 2013 #16
Here's one for starters Orrex Jan 2013 #17
your article bigapple1963 Jan 2013 #18
Your definition of subsidy is at odds with reality Orrex Jan 2013 #19
Hubby and I were talking about this last night Smilo Jan 2013 #5
They have them now. blackspade Jan 2013 #6
True enough there Smilo Jan 2013 #10
Companies are using the Court system to get people to pay debts. NutmegYankee Jan 2013 #11
I think we need to start calling oil subsidies oil stamps. Help neo cons get the picture. great pic okaawhatever Jan 2013 #12
32 days? hfojvt Jan 2013 #13
k/r Orrex Jan 2013 #15
 

bigapple1963

(111 posts)
2. I'm confused
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 02:07 PM
Jan 2013

Does this mean Exxon does not pay any federal taxes? I think the guy on food stamps pays little or no federal taxes.

Or is this something like mortgage interest deductions where companies can shield some revenue?

 

bigapple1963

(111 posts)
14. are these
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:30 PM
Jan 2013

"oil subsidies" direct cash subsidies or tax credits?

Cash subsidies: direct transfer of cash.

Tax credits: you still pay taxes, but just less.


I'm trying to figure out whether these subsidies are more like food stamps (as in the cartoon) or like mortgage interest deductions (tax shields).

jeff47

(26,549 posts)
16. They're both.
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 06:31 PM
Jan 2013

There's an awful lot of them, many with positive intentions (such as home heating oil assistance).

Net result is cash going from the feds to the oil companies.

 

bigapple1963

(111 posts)
18. your article
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 07:24 PM
Jan 2013

basically says that these are tax breaks (which only work if you have taxes to pay), which are not what the poster above claimed (direct cash subsidies, zero federal taxes).

Orrex

(63,203 posts)
19. Your definition of subsidy is at odds with reality
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 08:41 PM
Jan 2013

A break on taxes owed is a direct cash subsidy. A tax break for taxes paid by a select and small constituency is a direct cash subsidy.

You apparently want to define "subsidy" as a literal wheelbarrow of actual cash actually rolled up to the corporate headquarters and dumped on the CEO's desk. That's a foolishly narrow and culpably short-sighted definition.

Smilo

(1,944 posts)
5. Hubby and I were talking about this last night
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 03:50 PM
Jan 2013

We came to the conclusion that the rightwing would like nothing better than to re-introduce debtors' prisons and the poorhouses.

To them the Victorian era was one to admire. The old Scrooge and Marley are to be glorified.

hfojvt

(37,573 posts)
13. 32 days?
Mon Jan 28, 2013, 05:24 PM
Jan 2013

But I thought the fiscal cliff deal masterfully p3wned the Republicans on sequestration.

Aren't we gonna celebrate another huge victory in 32 days?

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Here’s something for the ...