Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Better Believe It

(18,630 posts)
Thu Jan 26, 2012, 10:47 PM Jan 2012

Mitt Romney Offers Three Distortions About His Taxes All Rolled Up Into One Big Lie

Mitt Romney Offers Three Distortions About His Taxes All Rolled Up Into One Big Lie
By Joshua Holland
January 26, 2012


Romney: One of the reasons why we have a lower tax rate on capital gains is because capital gains are also being taxed at the corporate level. So as businesses earn profits, that’s taxed at 35 percent, then as they distribute those profits as dividends, that’s taxed at 15 percent more. So, all total, the tax rate is really closer to 45 or 50 percent.


Mendacious talking point, the first: “double-taxation.” We don't tax “funds” in this country, we tax transactions. If a company turns a profit on its transactions, it pays taxes on that profit. When it pays money out to investors as dividends, or when investors sell stock at a profit, those transactions are also taxed. No transaction is taxed twice.

Mendacious talking point, the second: that 35 percent tax rate. As I've written before, that's the top corporate tax rate on the books, but because businesses take advantage of all manner of loopholes, the effective rate – what they actually pay -- is actually far lower. It's a classic conservative talking-point that we have the highest corporate tax rate in the world, but the reality is that we collect less in corporate taxes than most developed countries. Studies of some of the biggest companies have shown their effective tax rates to be, on average, less than half of what's on the books.

And the sleight-of-hand: Bain Capital is a Limited Liability Company. This is what's known as a “pass-through” structure, meaning that the company pays zero in corporate income taxes – the partners' shares are taxed as income or losses on their personal returns, and, in this case, most of the gains are investment income taxed at 15 percent.

http://www.alternet.org/newsandviews/article/767184/mitt_romney_offers_three_distortions_about_his_taxes_all_rolled_up_into_one_big_lie/#paragraph5
5 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Mitt Romney Offers Three Distortions About His Taxes All Rolled Up Into One Big Lie (Original Post) Better Believe It Jan 2012 OP
Interesting. I never knew/understood the LLC "pass-through" stuff. nt gateley Jan 2012 #1
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2012 #2
And how is a limited partnership different from LLC's or is it a form of LLC? Better Believe It Jan 2012 #3
This message was self-deleted by its author Mosby Jan 2012 #4
Disgusting ingenuous dissembling distortions equal one big lie which is at the heart of everything indepat Jan 2012 #5

Response to Better Believe It (Original post)

Response to Better Believe It (Reply #3)

indepat

(20,899 posts)
5. Disgusting ingenuous dissembling distortions equal one big lie which is at the heart of everything
Fri Jan 27, 2012, 02:58 PM
Jan 2012

espoused by RWers.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Mitt Romney Offers Three ...